A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Whew!



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 5th 04, 04:57 PM
Blanche
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I haven't read the various articles by the multitude of companies
that worked on the film, but I'd be most interested in both
the makeup and special effects (visual effects is the CGI, special
effects are the physical gags) to learn if they were using
chocolate syrup or karo syrup for the blood or the relatively
newer concoction that apparently looks fantastic but tastes
horrible, so the actors despise having the blood capsules in the
mouth.

My problem with going to a film with gore is that I'm more
interested in the technology making it happen, so there's
almost no impact for me.

Now, doesn't that just ruin the gore for you?

  #2  
Old March 5th 04, 09:36 PM
Jay Honeck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

My problem with going to a film with gore is that I'm more
interested in the technology making it happen, so there's
almost no impact for me.


I'm usually the same way.

Not this time.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"


  #3  
Old March 6th 04, 10:43 AM
Cub Driver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Ironically, what we got from Mel Gibson's film is this: I can now almost
guarantee that neither child will grow up practicing *that* particular
religion.


Jay, you can't possibly make sure a prediction. Several of my
daughters grade-school chums grew up to be intensely religious, one of
them after a detour through the Naval Academy and Pensacola.

all the best -- Dan Ford
email: (requires authentication)

see the Warbird's Forum at
www.warbirdforum.com
and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com
  #4  
Old March 6th 04, 02:22 PM
Jay Honeck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jay, you can't possibly make sure a prediction. Several of my
daughters grade-school chums grew up to be intensely religious, one of
them after a detour through the Naval Academy and Pensacola.


Well, that's true. At some point, they will reach their own spiritual
crossroads.

I just don't think this flick does anything to portray Christianity in a
positive light -- and I doubt that was Mel Gibson's intended outcome.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"


  #5  
Old March 5th 04, 07:14 PM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"John Gaquin" wrote in message
...

"Jay Honeck" wrote in message

......(after taking the kids to see
"The Passion of the Christ" this evening.


What on earth would have induced you to take kids to that movie? Have you
been unaware of the controversy?


Oddly, the controversy seems to have centered on whether the movie is
anti-Semitic, not its violence. Since the only people who consider the movie
to be anti-Semitic are a bunch of intransigent hotheads who think any
mention of the crucifixion of Jesus is anti-Semitic, many people felt that
it was reasonable to ignore such extremist views.

Seriously, the only way that the ADL would not have been offended is if Mel
Gibson had depicted Christ as dying of appendicitis despite the heroic
efforts of his rabbinical doctors.


  #6  
Old March 5th 04, 09:50 PM
Jay Honeck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Seriously, the only way that the ADL would not have been offended is if
Mel
Gibson had depicted Christ as dying of appendicitis despite the heroic
efforts of his rabbinical doctors.


ROTFL!

Actually, CJ, the movie is VERY anti-Semitic. Of course, how could it NOT
be?

The main antagonist of Jesus is a very, very bad Rabbi dude. His ability to
stir up the mob -- depicted as barbarians and idiots -- was ironically
reminiscent of Nazi newsreel footage.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"


  #7  
Old March 6th 04, 10:48 AM
Cub Driver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Since the only people who consider the movie
to be anti-Semitic are a bunch of intransigent hotheads


The Wall Street Journal reviewer did take time out from his
description of the torture to point out that the Romans were falsely
depicted as benign, procedure-oriented, dispassionate rulers who were
more or less forced into the crucifixion by rabid, Jesus-hating Jews.
I envision the American army in Iraq, trying to mediate between Sunni
and Shi'a. The WSJ reviewer (okay, okay, his name ends in "stern")
thought that this was an a-historical view of Pilate and the Romans
generally.

all the best -- Dan Ford
email: (requires authentication)

see the Warbird's Forum at
www.warbirdforum.com
and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com
  #8  
Old March 5th 04, 03:43 PM
Dan Luke
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Jay Honeck" wrote:
(after taking the kids to see "The Passion of the Christ"
this evening. Tip of the Day: Don't waste your money


From the start I've felt there was something unsavory about Gibson and
his movie. Yesterday I found this:

Actor-director Mel Gibson talks about his new film, "The
Passion of the Christ," during a nationwide satellite
interview seen Sunday, Feb. 8, 2004, at North Ridge
United Methodist Church in Millbrook, Ala.

February 12, 2004

Mel Gibson has come under fire for being hard on Jews in
his film The Passion of the Christ, but apparently, he
feels that Protestants are also doomed to damnation. In
fact, it looks as if Gibson, a conservative Catholic,
believes that his Episcopalian wife could be going to hell.

Gibson, interviewed by the Herald Sun in Australia, was
asked if Protestants are denied eternal salvation.
"There is no salvation for those outside the (Catholic)
church," Gibson replied. "I believe it."

He elaborated: "Put it this way. My wife is a saint.
She's a much better person than I am. Honestly. She's,
like, Episcopalian, Church of England. She prays, she
believes in God, she knows Jesus, she believes in that
stuff. And it's just not fair if she doesn't make it;
she's better than I am. But that is a pronouncement from
the chair. I go with it."

That's creepy.
--
Dan
C172RG at BFM
(remove pants to reply by email)


  #9  
Old March 5th 04, 07:16 PM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dan Luke" wrote in message
...

He elaborated: "Put it this way. My wife is a saint.
She's a much better person than I am. Honestly. She's,
like, Episcopalian, Church of England. She prays, she
believes in God, she knows Jesus, she believes in that
stuff. And it's just not fair if she doesn't make it;
she's better than I am. But that is a pronouncement from
the chair. I go with it."

That's creepy.


No. Mel Gibson does not feel like arguing with God. However, he has been
misinformed as to what God's opinion is. :-)


  #10  
Old March 5th 04, 10:40 PM
Dan Luke
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"C J Campbell" wrote:
That's creepy.


No. Mel Gibson does not feel like arguing with God. However,
he has been misinformed as to what God's opinion is. :-)


You could say the same of Osama Bin Laden. Zealots are creepy,
regardless.

I don't know what God's opinion is, and I deeply mistrust those who
claim they do.
--
Dan
C172RG at BFM
(remove pants to reply by email)


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.