what would you do?

wrote in message
...
On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 06:53:30 GMT, tony roberts
wrote:

I liked her, and we formed a good relationship, and she was relieved
when I- right then - booked her a 2 hour check flight. And she readily
agreed that she would follow whatever advice resulted from the
checkflight.

So - To those who told me I was intefereing and to stay out of it - I'm
sorry but you were dead wrong - she was desperately looking for someone
to save her from herself and that is what I did.

Glad it worked out.

Two points -

1) I don't think anyone said ignore her - they (including me) said contact
her privately, if at all, which is what you did.

2) I'm sorry, but 75 or 20 - if she is going up in the sky she needs to take
more responsibility. "desperately looking for someone to save her from
herself and that is what I did" is only acceptable if she was not planning
to fly again anyway until she worked with a CFI. The point is YOU should not
be "saving" her - if she can't "save" herself through her own proactive
efforts at remedial training, or whatever she needs, she should probably not
be flying.


Michael


Wow, good for you. Thanks for following through.

Corky Scott

On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 06:53:30 GMT, tony roberts
wrote:

I liked her, and we formed a good relationship, and she was relieved
when I- right then - booked her a 2 hour check flight. And she readily
agreed that she would follow whatever advice resulted from the
checkflight.

A much better way to handlr things. You did the right thing and
learned alot about this person too. You should feel good about
yourself in the fact you dealt with it one on one first. I doubt this
would have been the outcome if you'd have involved the feds right
away.

Thanks for the update, nice job, and I'm sorry about your friend.
z