![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Actually it could work very well, and I have seen this proposal from
several different sources. The Idea is to install a low power cell phone tower into the airliner. As I understand it that signal bar you see on you Cell phone is dictates how much power the cell phone uses to transmit. So the closer you are to the tower the less power it uses to transmit. This is why you phone batteries probably last longer in town than the do out in the boondocks. By installing the tower in the aircraft you are only a few hundred feet from the tower (at the most). The Cell phones will get an excellent signal from it and will drop to the lowest transmit power setting, Thus the interference with towers on the ground should be minimal. I am not an expert on these, I am just repeating how it was explained to me. Brian "Morgans" wrote in message ... "Bob Chilcoat" wrote in message ... I noticed on the evening news the other night that someone is trying to get a modular mobile "cell tower" approved that would be installed in commercial aircraft so that passengers can use their own mobile phones. It will be interesting to see how the FCC and FAA handle this one. -- Bob (Chief Pilot, White Knuckle Airways) Still won't work. The frequency the cell in the air is on, will be hitting dozens of towers on the ground, making them unable to use that frequency for other users on the land. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brian Case wrote:
As I understand it that signal bar you see on you Cell phone is dictates how much power the cell phone uses to transmit. So the closer you are to the tower the less power it uses to transmit. This is why you phone batteries probably last longer in town than the do out in the boondocks. The cellular phone does use an adaptive power control (it's not tied to the signal strength bar). The problem is that even at mimimal power, if you're sitting close to the window, you can be heard equally well by a large number of cells over the system. There's nothing magic that they can do to stop this short of rf shielding the aircraft windows somehow. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brian Case wrote:
As I understand it that signal bar you see on you Cell phone is dictates how much power the cell phone uses to transmit. So the closer you are to the tower the less power it uses to transmit. This is why you phone batteries probably last longer in town than the do out in the boondocks. The cellular phone does use an adaptive power control (it's not tied to the signal strength bar). The problem is that even at mimimal power, if you're sitting close to the window, you can be heard equally well by a large number of cells over the system. There's nothing magic that they can do to stop this short of rf shielding the aircraft windows somehow. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Brian Case" wrote in message om... Actually it could work very well, and I have seen this proposal from several different sources. The Idea is to install a low power cell phone tower into the airliner. As I understand it that signal bar you see on you Cell phone is dictates how much power the cell phone uses to transmit. So the closer you are to the tower the less power it uses to transmit. This is why you phone batteries probably last longer in town than the do out in the boondocks. By installing the tower in the aircraft you are only a few hundred feet from the tower (at the most). The Cell phones will get an excellent signal from it and will drop to the lowest transmit power setting, Thus the interference with towers on the ground should be minimal. I am not an expert on these, I am just repeating how it was explained to me. Brian I could see the possibilities of strong enough signal not reaching the ground to cause problems, but...... Which company (Of the multitudes) will you have to belong to, to get your phone to work? How will the plane's system communicate with the ground? By cell tower? g -- Jim in NC --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.774 / Virus Database: 521 - Release Date: 10/7/2004 |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Brian Case" wrote in message om... Actually it could work very well, and I have seen this proposal from several different sources. The Idea is to install a low power cell phone tower into the airliner. As I understand it that signal bar you see on you Cell phone is dictates how much power the cell phone uses to transmit. So the closer you are to the tower the less power it uses to transmit. This is why you phone batteries probably last longer in town than the do out in the boondocks. By installing the tower in the aircraft you are only a few hundred feet from the tower (at the most). The Cell phones will get an excellent signal from it and will drop to the lowest transmit power setting, Thus the interference with towers on the ground should be minimal. I am not an expert on these, I am just repeating how it was explained to me. Brian I could see the possibilities of strong enough signal not reaching the ground to cause problems, but...... Which company (Of the multitudes) will you have to belong to, to get your phone to work? How will the plane's system communicate with the ground? By cell tower? g -- Jim in NC --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.774 / Virus Database: 521 - Release Date: 10/7/2004 |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The only thing that I see wrong with this is that the cell "tower" needs
to connect to the wired phone system. We know that it can't be hardwired, that would be one hell of a long cable! So, as the "tower" needs to transmit and receive (transceiver) from other transceivers on the ground that are hardwired to the phone system. You can put the ground transceivers on a different frequency pairs, but that's a whole new world wide system! Brian Case wrote: Actually it could work very well, and I have seen this proposal from several different sources. The Idea is to install a low power cell phone tower into the airliner. As I understand it that signal bar you see on you Cell phone is dictates how much power the cell phone uses to transmit. So the closer you are to the tower the less power it uses to transmit. This is why you phone batteries probably last longer in town than the do out in the boondocks. By installing the tower in the aircraft you are only a few hundred feet from the tower (at the most). The Cell phones will get an excellent signal from it and will drop to the lowest transmit power setting, Thus the interference with towers on the ground should be minimal. I am not an expert on these, I am just repeating how it was explained to me. Brian "Morgans" wrote in message ... "Bob Chilcoat" wrote in message ... I noticed on the evening news the other night that someone is trying to get a modular mobile "cell tower" approved that would be installed in commercial aircraft so that passengers can use their own mobile phones. It will be interesting to see how the FCC and FAA handle this one. -- Bob (Chief Pilot, White Knuckle Airways) Still won't work. The frequency the cell in the air is on, will be hitting dozens of towers on the ground, making them unable to use that frequency for other users on the land. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The only thing that I see wrong with this is that the cell "tower" needs
to connect to the wired phone system. We know that it can't be hardwired, that would be one hell of a long cable! So, as the "tower" needs to transmit and receive (transceiver) from other transceivers on the ground that are hardwired to the phone system. You can put the ground transceivers on a different frequency pairs, but that's a whole new world wide system! Brian Case wrote: Actually it could work very well, and I have seen this proposal from several different sources. The Idea is to install a low power cell phone tower into the airliner. As I understand it that signal bar you see on you Cell phone is dictates how much power the cell phone uses to transmit. So the closer you are to the tower the less power it uses to transmit. This is why you phone batteries probably last longer in town than the do out in the boondocks. By installing the tower in the aircraft you are only a few hundred feet from the tower (at the most). The Cell phones will get an excellent signal from it and will drop to the lowest transmit power setting, Thus the interference with towers on the ground should be minimal. I am not an expert on these, I am just repeating how it was explained to me. Brian "Morgans" wrote in message ... "Bob Chilcoat" wrote in message ... I noticed on the evening news the other night that someone is trying to get a modular mobile "cell tower" approved that would be installed in commercial aircraft so that passengers can use their own mobile phones. It will be interesting to see how the FCC and FAA handle this one. -- Bob (Chief Pilot, White Knuckle Airways) Still won't work. The frequency the cell in the air is on, will be hitting dozens of towers on the ground, making them unable to use that frequency for other users on the land. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
DaveC wrote:
Cell phone usage is restricted on all domestic commercial flights by the FAA, so the flight attendant keeps telling me. I seem to recall that this wasn't so, early in cellular history. Weren't we able to use cell phones on flights, long ago? Is cell phone usage also restricted on private jets, etc. for similar reasons? So my question... what is the technical reason for restriction of cell phone us on commercial flights? Is this reason valid, technically? Or is it simply an excuse to force anyone who needs to make a call to use the airline's on-board phones (and pay their outrageous rates)? The origin of the ban was due to concerns about cellphone transmissions interfering with onboard avionics. This is more likely to be a concern with older a/c. There is no hard data that I know of that substantiates the concern. There is some anecdotal evidence of interference though. As another poster has mentioned, cellphones don't work well at altitude. Both Boeing and Airbus are now working on systems to enable airborne use of cellphones. Graham |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
DaveC wrote:
Cell phone usage is restricted on all domestic commercial flights by the FAA, so the flight attendant keeps telling me. I seem to recall that this wasn't so, early in cellular history. Weren't we able to use cell phones on flights, long ago? Is cell phone usage also restricted on private jets, etc. for similar reasons? So my question... what is the technical reason for restriction of cell phone us on commercial flights? Is this reason valid, technically? Or is it simply an excuse to force anyone who needs to make a call to use the airline's on-board phones (and pay their outrageous rates)? The origin of the ban was due to concerns about cellphone transmissions interfering with onboard avionics. This is more likely to be a concern with older a/c. There is no hard data that I know of that substantiates the concern. There is some anecdotal evidence of interference though. As another poster has mentioned, cellphones don't work well at altitude. Both Boeing and Airbus are now working on systems to enable airborne use of cellphones. Graham |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Joseph wrote: On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 11:38:10 -0700, DaveC wrote: Cell phone usage is restricted on all domestic commercial flights by the FAA, so the flight attendant keeps telling me. I seem to recall that this wasn't so, early in cellular history. Weren't we able to use cell phones on flights, long ago? Is cell phone usage also restricted on private jets, etc. for similar reasons? Restriction of cell phones from planes is not due to the interference to avionics, but is more of concern that it will interfere with land-based communications. When you're up at a height and you attempt to use your phone you are hitting a whole lot of cell sites as once and if lots of people did this it would make a real mess of land-based cellular service. So it's more of an FCC mandate than it is of the FAA. I thought that the base station antenna patterns pretty much ignore any signal greater than a few ( maybe ~10 ) degrees above the horizon. Graham |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Watch them 12V Cell Phone Adapters TSA Panics Again | NW_PILOT | Piloting | 7 | October 13th 04 04:33 AM |
Cell Phone in small plane | Ron | Home Built | 1 | August 6th 04 02:10 PM |
Flying weather on your cell phone | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 6 | April 24th 04 01:59 AM |
Interesting use of cell phone to command a sharp roll to the right! | Peter Bondar | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | December 19th 03 02:27 PM |
Palm cell phone and aviation | Maule Driver | Piloting | 3 | November 24th 03 11:52 PM |