A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

FAA Eases ADS-B STC Requirement



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old May 17th 16, 07:47 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Vaughn Simon[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 67
Default FAA Eases ADS-B STC Requirement

This is from early March, so it's likely old news to some here, but in a
new policy letter the FAA has eased the requirement for a separate STC
for every model of aircraft. This should have happened years ago!

New FAA Policy: http://tinyurl.com/FAA-ADSB-Policy

News Article:
http://www.ainonline.com/aviation-ne...-installations


"The FAA released a policy memo on March 2 that updates guidance on
installation of ADS-B out systems, essentially allowing avionics shops
to install ADS-B equipment on aircraft not covered by a supplemental
type certificate (STC) without having to obtain a new STC. This new
policy, said Bill Stone, Garmin senior business development manager,
“significantly reduces cost, downtime and uncertainty about how long the
aircraft is going to be down.” The installer does have to obtain
permission from the original STC holder.

Earlier in the ADS-B upgrade process, the FAA was requiring that each
aircraft model have its own STC. “The agency was pretty concerned as new
equipment hit the market to ensure that it worked correctly,” Stone
explained. “The original policy was that it could be installed only via
STC. That would maintain a high level of involvement and ensure that
aircraft entering airspace [where ADS-B is required] are operating as
intended and not bringing the system to its knees.”

The FAA eased the requirements somewhat a few years ago, allowing
approved ADS-B transmitter and GPS position source pairings–once
STC’d–to be field approved in other aircraft models. “This is less of a
cost and time burden than an STC,” he said, “but it does require FAA
involvement, and that could inject FAA time and uncertainty and
additional cost.”

Now the FAA has issued the new policy, and basically if the installation
is a major alteration, it will still need field approval. This may be
the case where a new antenna needs to be installed on a pressurized
airplane, for example. A simple ADS-B out installation in a
non-pressurized airplane will be a minor alteration, and it can be
signed off by an A&P mechanic holding an Inspection Authorization or a
Part 145 repair station. “It doesn’t call for FAA involvement at all,”
Stone said. “Basically we’re talking a radio installation; it’s not
major surgery.”"
(Rest of article at the link)
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
91.205 compass requirement [email protected] Soaring 24 April 23rd 16 07:22 AM
Requirement of AW 139 pilot sanjay Rotorcraft 2 August 25th 08 10:06 AM
CFI logging requirement [email protected] Owning 9 October 19th 04 07:11 PM
Mode S to become requirement? Bob Chilcoat Owning 6 July 14th 04 11:25 PM
New Castle ELT Requirement Ed Byars Soaring 16 June 19th 04 06:15 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.