![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As opposed to speed to fly the decision on when to leave a thermal is easy
'Climb only high enough in the current thermal to reach a better one or the finish line' Works in or out of the Mountains "Todd Pattist" wrote in message ... Andy Blackburn wrote: I looked at several flight traces from ASA contest days in Arizona this year and found that the pilots who flew farther between taking thermals (and used broader altitude bands as a result) had higher average climb rates and better achieved X-C speeds than those who stayed higher. That is, they kept pushing farther (and lower) to get the better thermals. Even if they weren't pushing on for a better thermal (and they probably were), there is often some time lost centering each thermal, and that's pure lost time. Working a narrower band means more thermals and more of those centering losses. I just wish I could convince myself to work the broader band more :-) Todd Pattist - "WH" Ventus C (Remove DONTSPAMME from address to email reply.) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Reno Air Races -- 2600 Miles in 2 Days! | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 88 | September 25th 04 03:48 PM |
Crossing the Rocky Mountains | RD | Piloting | 16 | January 9th 04 09:15 PM |
Across Nevada and Part Way Back (long) | Marry Daniel or David Grah | Soaring | 18 | July 30th 03 08:52 PM |