![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
"Doug" wrote in message oups.com... There was a fairly high profile case some years ago with a commercial aircraft in Maryland. ATC cleared him to descend prematurely. Sounds like you're referring to TWA514. ATC didn't issue a descent clearance, ATC issued an approach clearance. The pilot descended through an intermediate altitude. It wasn't MD either, was just over the ridge here in Virginia. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 16:42:44 -0700, "Jay Beckman"
wrote: "A.Coleman" wrote in message om... Please read this. This is what's killing GA and we ought to do something about it. I'm curious about something from the "4PA" incident... The article mentions that there were five aircraft ostensibly travelling together along the same route, right? What if the lead aircraft (if there was one...) had mentioned to the controller that they were a "flight of five" from the Pan Am Academy? Might that have made a lightbulb go off in the controllers head that "these five probably have similar call signs." ?? According to the article in the last paragraph and the NTSB report, the aircraft were on an IFR flight plan. So they would not be reporting to ATC as a flight of 5. They had a 5-10 min separation between each other. You would only use flight of X for formation flying. There was no tops reported but it was overcast at 2000 agl 18 miles away which would be around 3400 MSL and the wreckage was found at 5500 msl. It would be hard to fly formation while IMC and at night. So they would not have reported as such. Scott D To email remove spamcatcher |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Scott D. wrote in message ... According to the article in the last paragraph and the NTSB report, the aircraft were on an IFR flight plan. So they would not be reporting to ATC as a flight of 5. There's no restriction on formation flights for IFR operations or conditions. The military does it regularly, civil operators very rarely. The only regulatory restriction on formation flights is carrying passengers for hire. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron Natalie writes:
Sounds like you're referring to TWA514. ATC didn't issue a descent clearance, ATC issued an approach clearance. The pilot descended through an intermediate altitude. It wasn't MD either, was just over the ridge here in Virginia. Right into Mount Weather, the ""secret"" WWIII redoubt for POTUS. -- A host is a host from coast to & no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433 is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What kind of pod is it? | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 12 | February 23rd 05 08:53 AM |
can anyone tell me what kind of airplane this is? | Vigo Carpath | Owning | 5 | June 5th 04 08:09 AM |
This is why we train (kind of long) | SD | Piloting | 38 | January 20th 04 04:06 PM |
A different kind of flight school | John Harlow | Piloting | 3 | August 18th 03 08:35 PM |
New kind of helicopter? | John Ross | Piloting | 10 | August 15th 03 03:26 AM |