![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Guillermo" wrote in message ... I was wondering what is exactly the function of the impulse-coupled magneto. I've read about them a little bit on the web, but I'd like somebody to explain it in simple terms. A regular non impulse magneto has the engine rotation directly attached to the rotating part of the magneto, so at low cranking speeds, it may not be going past the windings fast enough to generate a sufficient spark. An impulse magneto has the generating part of the magneto designed just the same as the regular magneto, but the trickery comes in, at how the magneto is coupled to the engine. In the impulse type, when the engine is being turned very slowly, there are little counterweights that do not allow the generating portion to turn, but instead, the rotation winds up a powerful spring. When it gets all the way wound up, and the time has come to make a spark, it releases, and spins the generating gizmo fast as the devil, creating a powerful spark, which sends your piston scurrying down it's travel. The next time around, the mag will be going fast enough to not wind up the spring, and it will behave just like a regular magneto. The winding up of the spring also serves to delay the spark until the piston has barely gone past top dead center, rather than well before top dead center. That is the reason you shut off the other regular mag; so it does not possibly fire early, and make the starter have to work against the attempted backwards combustion. The impulse magneto is why rotating a prop can be so dangerous. If it has the mags turned off, but the impulse mag has had it's ground path fail, it will still wind up the spring. No matter how slowly the prop turns, if it has a sufficient fuel air mix left in the cylinder and the impulse snaps over center, the windings will send the spark on the way, thus starting the engine. By the way, at OSH, in the HB show area, the young men and women (Aviation Explorers) helping you park your plane are NOT ALLOWED to touch your prop, due to safety rules, because of this characteristic. Clear enough? Ask if you need more clarification. -- Jim in NC |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]() RST Engineering wrote: I suppose we can go down the list of every aircraft that was ever made and start a table. I'm not going to waste my time doing that. My old straight tailed 172 had dual impulse mags. Made for very easy handpropping, which was often required because of the cheesy 20 amp generator. Most of the later model Lycoming powered Cessnas and Pipers that I've seen have the impulse mag on the left only. Piper started doing this in the Cherokee model right after they quit using shower of sparks. Standard start procedure was : key switch on the left mag and hit the starter button. John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180) |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Assuming lawyers drive every technical decision nowdays, I wonder why
they did that (recommend switching to single impulse mags)? |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Guillermo wrote:
what is a non-impulse coupled magneto? (also a question, not a quiz) As has been explained elsewhere, an impulse coupling is a feature of some magnetos which enhances the spark and retards the timing at low revolutions. A "non-impulse coupled magneto" does not have an impulse coupling. To give an example, the left magneto on the Lycoming O-320-B2D has an impulse coupling. The right one does not. When the ignition switch is placed in the "start" position, the left mag is hot and the right one is grounded out. If the left magneto fails for any reason, it is impossible to start the engine with either the starter or by hand-propping. With that engine, the right magneto is a non-impulse coupled magneto. George Patterson "Naked" means you ain't got no clothes on; "nekkid" means you ain't got no clothes on - and are up to somethin'. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My point was that if it gets past the point where it's going to keep
running, just leave it off. A quick flick of the switch to OFF and back ON it will certainly quit firing and lose a few rpm, but it won't die. I've been doing these as long as I've been flying (the 70s) and I think it's important to know the mags aren't hot. It's part of my shut down. You should simply use any method you feel comfortable with to check the P leads. wrote in message ups.com... It WILL start to shudder and die if you turn it off, unless there's a bad P-lead connection or mag switch. You want it back on so you can shut the engine off with mixture, not ignition. Dan |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Exactly. I learned to fly in the early '70s and they didn't
teach us to look for a hot mag. I learned that when upgrading some years ago. Doing this, I found that one of our 172's mag switches would allow the mags to keep firing if the key was forced against the "Off" stop, and upon investigation found an AD against any of those switches that did that (76-07-12). Bet there are still a lot of them out there. As far as the discussion about a single impulse mag rather than two: Lycoming may have recommended a change to one to get rid of the impulse coupling on one mag. The springs in these things have been known to fail, and with two mags one might fail and not be readily noticed if the pilot is a careless twit who doesn't do a decent runup; if the other spring then failed as well the timing on both would go to near zero BTDC. Power output would be low indeed. Corrosion has been a problem in engines seldom flown or flown on very short flights, and the springs, being a high-carbon steel, corrode quickly. The Bendix dual mag (one housing, one gear and impulse coupling, two mags) had an AD against it to replace that spring with a better one, since its failure could and did cause accidents. Dan |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
DT - Good explanation. I'd think a broken impulse spring would cause
the timing to lag so much that the runnup would make it obvious something is grossly wrong. Maybe not? |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ups.com... Exactly. I learned to fly in the early '70s and they didn't teach us to look for a hot mag. I learned that when upgrading some years ago. Doing this, I found that one of our 172's mag switches would allow the mags to keep firing if the key was forced against the "Off" stop, and upon investigation found an AD against any of those switches that did that (76-07-12). Bet there are still a lot of them out there. Well, I certainly had occasion to turn the key to "OFF" on a 172 and hand it to my instructor in the right seat while the prop kept spinning. We reported it (and it was returned "fixed") at least 3 times on that aircraft before somebody finally managed to isolate and *really* fix the problem. Otherwise the RPM drop for each mag was consistent, so both mags were "grounding", but not in the OFF position. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
OtisWinslow wrote:
snip That's a good thing to pay attention to. You can also check it at idle before shut down by briefly turning the switch to "OFF" and see if the engine starts to shut down. I've been taught this shtudown procedure, too. But, what is the magic about turning them BOTH off, simultaneously? If, at idle, you turned off the left mag, and noted an rpm drop, then turned off the right one, and also noted an rpm drop, then doesn't that confirm the same thing as turning both of and feeling for the engine to start to shut-down? Although, maybe it's just me remembering my student fubar of once turning off both mags during runup, then turning them back on, and KA-BLAM! |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wade" wrote I've been taught this shtudown procedure, too. But, what is the magic about turning them BOTH off, simultaneously? As someone else said, it catches a faulty "off" position, in the switch. -- Jim in NC |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
American nazi pond scum, version two | bushite kills bushite | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 21st 04 10:46 PM |
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |
Accidents happen... | Manuel | Piloting | 26 | November 28th 04 11:32 AM |
LEFT WINGERS IN FOR BIG SURPISE - STROKES TO FOLLOW ELECTION | Jarg | Military Aviation | 3 | April 20th 04 06:37 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |