![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In 1998, John and Ashley Sims created a two-way map of England. It had a standard view for people travelling north and an upside-down view for people travelling south. When men heard about it, they tended to laugh, thinking it was a joke. Women said: "What a great idea!"
A British newspaper offered 100 maps free. It received requests from 15,000 women - and a handful of men. Yes, we're different all right. ***************** found he http://www.associateprograms.com/sea...etter032.shtml Interesting. But driving is not the same as flying, inasmuch as situational awareness is not critical, nor need it be three-dimensional. There is no need to match up the ground with the map in the same way as in flying. But that's besides the point. The sex difference is interesting. Jose -- Nothing takes longer than a shortcut. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
According to the Peases', the sex difference is based on how men and women's
brains are configured and developed. They are very different because, in pre-feminist 20th century evolutionary terms, men and women fulfilled entirely different roles to ensure the survival of the species. Fascinating stuff and, as I said, should be mandatory reading. Ever wonder why, when you get home from work, your wife wants to talk your ear off when all you want is a half hour by yourself? Men typically speak about 10,000-15,000 words in a day, and a day at work usually achieves that; women use around 80,000. If she's only used 50,000 by the time you get home, guess who's going to get the other 30,000 before bedtime? Why? Women's linguistic centers in the brain are way more developed than mens' - they provided the social center of a tribe and the collective peacekeeping/relationship building to ensure the tribe stayed together for survival in numbers. Meanwhile men were out hunting and keeping quiet so they didn't spook the game, only speaking to communicate important information. Men use language to communicate information, women use it to build and sustain relationships. If you've ever had an argument with your wife in the car about reading the map, you ought to read the book. After you do, guarantee you'll never ask your wife to read the map again (standard exception disclaimer implied). Anyway, a fascinating and very funny look at how men and women are different. Worth a read. Shawn "Jose" wrote in message . .. In 1998, John and Ashley Sims created a two-way map of England. It had a standard view for people travelling north and an upside-down view for people travelling south. When men heard about it, they tended to laugh, thinking it was a joke. Women said: "What a great idea!" A British newspaper offered 100 maps free. It received requests from 15,000 women - and a handful of men. Yes, we're different all right. ***************** found he http://www.associateprograms.com/sea...etter032.shtml Interesting. But driving is not the same as flying, inasmuch as situational awareness is not critical, nor need it be three-dimensional. There is no need to match up the ground with the map in the same way as in flying. But that's besides the point. The sex difference is interesting. Jose -- Nothing takes longer than a shortcut. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Friedrich,
I hadn't thought about it until you mentioned it but I can now see that north-up for big picture and track-up for close navigation is very useful and pretty much what I end up doing. Good point. Shawn "Friedrich Ostertag" wrote in message ... Peter R. wrote: ShawnD2112 wrote: Male preference is for north-up while female preference is for track-up, generally (all who are going to add how they are an exception can save the typing - this is a gross generalization). Gross generalization or not, where did you get this theory? I suppose you don't have an Internet reference to educate those of us equipped with an apparent female preference, eh? from the book mentioned: ***************** In 1998, John and Ashley Sims created a two-way map of England. It had a standard view for people travelling north and an upside-down view for people travelling south. When men heard about it, they tended to laugh, thinking it was a joke. Women said: "What a great idea!" A British newspaper offered 100 maps free. It received requests from 15,000 women - and a handful of men. Yes, we're different all right. ***************** found he http://www.associateprograms.com/sea...etter032.shtml I will not be held responsible for the scientific value and correctness of the statement :-) Personally, I use north-up on my car navigation most of the time (I'm not a pilot). But when approaching junctions, the system switches to track-up (and zooms in) automatically, and I find that very useful. To me it seems that for the "big picture" north-up is more helpful, while for locating yourself in the close surroundings, track-up might even make it easier for men :-) regards, Friedrich -- für reply bitte die offensichtliche Änderung an der Adresse vornehmen |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ShawnD2112 wrote:
This argument is almost as insolvable as the "Newton or Bernoulli" or "high vs low wing" ones. This one basically comes down to how much testosterone you got in the womb. Male preference is for north-up while female preference is for track-up, generally (all who are going to add how they are an exception can save the typing - Oddly enough, I had everything set in Track up in the Navion and Margy made me switch the MX20 to Norht Up. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kai Glaesner wrote:
Reason was he wanted the screen helping him to build a "mental-picture" about what's ahead and around. Track up. I have both NEXRAD (actually WSI's NOWRAD) and traffic displayed on an MX20. Combine these two with projected GPS course line and predicted actual track while flying an IFR approach and IME track up provides a much more intuitive situational picture. I do not have to perform mental gymnastics of flipping the picture in my head when scanning the MX20 during the approach. -- Peter ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter R." wrote in message ... Kai Glaesner wrote: Reason was he wanted the screen helping him to build a "mental-picture" about what's ahead and around. Track up. I have both NEXRAD (actually WSI's NOWRAD) and traffic displayed on an MX20. Combine these two with projected GPS course line and predicted actual track while flying an IFR approach and IME track up provides a much more intuitive situational picture. Track up....Sandel EHSI. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Kai Glaesner" wrote: Hello, ran into a discussion with a pilot-friend-of-mine on sunday about how to set up our GNS430 on a short IFR Trip. I prefer a North-Up mode, because it makes it easier for me to corelate what's on the screen with the paper-charts I have on my kneeboard. He wanted it to be in either Track-Up or (me complaining about a too-frequent need for redraw) Desired-Track-Up mode. Reason was he wanted the screen helping him to build a "mental-picture" about what's ahead and around. No consens was found so I would like to hear from you: are your a "North-Up" or a "Track-Up" sort of pilot (explanation why you are would help)? USAF Navigators that I know and work with (former B-52, former KC-135, current E-8C navs) use North-up. They tend to just fly waypoint to waypoint. The two F-111 WSOs I worked with use Track-up. They spend a lot of time making sure they don't hit the ground and want to have a better mental picture of the ground features along the track. IOW - high flyers use North-up and the low-level guys use Track-up. (this has been discussed in rec.aviation in the past - but it's been a few years). -- Bob Noel no one likes an educated mule |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
IOW - high flyers use North-up and the low-level guys use Track-up.
Interesting. I like track up, and I also like to fly real low. Jose -- Nothing takes longer than a shortcut. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Jose wrote: IOW - high flyers use North-up and the low-level guys use Track-up. Interesting. I like track up, and I also like to fly real low. low and fast? ;-) -- Bob Noel no one likes an educated mule |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
low and fast? ;-)
As fast as a Dakota will take me. Jose -- Nothing takes longer than a shortcut. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Air Ops North Atlantic - Ron Knott | Greasy Rider© @invalid.com | Naval Aviation | 1 | June 4th 05 06:52 PM |
Pirep: Garmin GPSMAP 296 versus 295. (very long) | Jon Woellhaf | Piloting | 12 | September 4th 04 11:55 PM |
Moving to Alaska, anyone need glider transported north from NM | Jeff Landfield | Soaring | 0 | July 9th 04 04:46 AM |
The battle for Arlington Airport begins? | Paul Adriance | Home Built | 45 | March 30th 04 11:41 PM |
N. Korea Agrees to Nuke Talks | Dav1936531 | Military Aviation | 1 | August 2nd 03 06:53 AM |