![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I wouldn't really call it unfriendly, it just seems they contradict
themselves sometimes, then blame the pilot for the mistake One time I was with my instructor, we were in Buckeye 4 (N40SU) waiting at 9R. The governor's king air was taxiing out to 9R from the north side. I believe their tail # was N440H or something like that, it had a 4 and an OH on the end. Anyway, I call up the tower and tell them we are ready to go. tower : '40SU position and hold'. we roll out and stop, with the king air on the taxiway on the north side, waiting. so 30-45 seconds go by, no instructions to anybody, no radio comm. Then, tower: '40SU, exit rw 9R'. What the hell!? I was speechless. I just looked at my instructor, who was shaking his head. Later, when we were done with the lesson, he had talked to the controller, I don't know who initiated the call. But he told me that the controller had read him the riot act about 'holding up the governor' and all this crap. The idiot just read the wrong call sign and wouldn't admit it. If he would have just cleared us to go, we would have been gone and out of the way. By having us hold, then exit probably ate up a couple of minutes. "Bruce E Butts" wrote in message . .. I fly out of OSU as well and have found that since it is a Non Federal Control Tower the controllers there can have an unfriendly attitude depending on which controller is working at the time. I do not know them except having met the control tower manager a few times, he is concerned about the less than friendly treatment that students and others get at OSU so I encourage you to call. The management is aware that they have a reputation as being nonstudent friendly and have encouraged local pilots to respond to surveys regarding the service. It sounds like to me that the controller made a mistake. Bruce. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It sounds like you were right, if that means much except from the point of
education or personal gratification. If this is the worst thing that a controller has said you're doing pretty well- you didn't violate any FAR's, no one was hurt, and you didn't damage anything. The controllers are human too, and get tired, make mistakes, and have a hard time knowing all of the often ridiculous FAA regulations, just like pilots. If the particular controller has had a habit of snapping at people and berating them over the air, then it should be reported to the tower supe as well as the customer assurance controller at the nearest facility (Newps can provide the exact job titles). You can call them and report the time and date of the incident, and ask that they review the tapes. Also, you should take it up with the airport staff as well as the FBO, since such individuals have a negative impact on business (who wants to go to an airport with a bad reputation and the anticipation that you'll get yelled at, particularly if you're unfamiliar?) If enough pilots complain about their treatment over the air, you can bet that something will be done quickly. The worst thing would be to get into a ****ing contest on the air. Also, if you did make a major error like a runway incursion, etc remember that if you call the tower and admit you did something majorly wrong (like an obvious FAR violation) your comments could potentially be used against you in an FAA action. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Viperdoc wrote: then it should be reported to the tower supe as well as the customer assurance controller at the nearest facility (Newps can provide the exact job titles). You can call them and report the time and date of the incident, and ask that they review the tapes. If it's a nonfederal tower then a call to the nearest big city FAA tower is in order. The FAA oversees these towers and can have an impact on stuff like this. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've always just specifically requested a stop and go if that's what I
wanted to do so the controller could plan accordingly. All the other options imply that you're going to keep moving or exit the runway. "Mike W." wrote in message ... This afternoon I went out for a few laps at Ohio State. Weather was pretty marginal, so I did 2 landings there, departed to an uncontrolled field about 12mi away for a few, then came back. I wanted to do a few more, so I was doing t-n-g's on the north runway. Each time, the controller said 'clear for the option'. So on one lap, I decided I wanted to practice a short field landing. Stuck it, stopped and requested a back taxi. Nope, roll down to end and taxi back on taxiway, then reprimanded me for stopping on the runway. He wasn't nasty about it. 'I know you're the only one up there, but it's baaaaaad practice...' etc. I went through this several times when I was learning to fly there, as did other students. Even my flight instructors would get frustrated with this exact situation. The airport was not at all busy. I am not arguing this guys authority or anything, but we have to be able to practice these landings somewhere, I'm not going to an 1500' strip out in the boonies to practice for real. I was this close to asking the guy for the number up in the cab, but figured I would just go home even more puzzled. So, you controllers out there, what exactly am I cleared to do with 'cleared for the option' that differs from 'clear for touch and go' or 'clear to land'? Do I need to request, specifically, that I am wanting to practice a short field, with full braking and a complete stop on the runway? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Displaced AFSS "controllers" heading for BIL and GRB | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 12 | April 10th 05 09:22 PM |
Aviation Conspiracy: FAA Calls Controller Whistleblowers "Rogue Employees!!! | Bill Mulcahy | General Aviation | 0 | March 31st 05 04:29 AM |
Third Military-Civil MAC Jan. 18, 2005 | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 37 | February 14th 05 03:21 PM |
Flight Controllers | Howard Witzenburger | Simulators | 1 | September 24th 04 02:25 AM |
FS9 - force feedback & 2 controllers | JT | Simulators | 0 | October 22nd 03 02:24 PM |