If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Questions pondered at 6500 feet
I would hope the windsock is on the side or corner!
Which corner of the circle Nathan? :^) Bryan "The Monk" Chaisone |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Questions pondered at 6500 feet
"Nathan Young" wrote in message ... I would hope the windsock is on the side or corner! A circle with corners? |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Questions pondered at 6500 feet
"Jay Honeck" wrote in message Seems like a giant pain for the flight crew, to have to keep all the various approach plates, etc., at hand. My bag weighed 42 lbs. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Questions pondered at 6500 feet
On 2006-01-16, Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
Where's the pain? The approach in use will be on the ATIS, crews generally have that information before they ever talk to approach control. And it is a crew, it ain't one guy thumbing through a Jepp binder while trying to hand-fly the airplane. I also bet most of the crew know their regular approaches well, and probably only pull out the plate to satisfy the airline's procedure. -- Dylan Smith, Port St Mary, Isle of Man Flying: http://www.dylansmith.net Oolite-Linux: an Elite tribute: http://oolite-linux.berlios.de Frontier Elite Universe: http://www.alioth.net |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Questions pondered at 6500 feet
Jay Honeck wrote:
2. We often hear commercial airliners "cleared for the visual approach" into thus-and-such an airport. However, we *also* often hear commercial airliners "cleared for the ILS Rwy 14 approach" (for example) -- even though conditions in the area are perfectly CAVU. Jay, many times when flying back to my home airport I will request the visual and still be vectored for the ILS and told to intercept the localizer. I had always assumed that this was done by the controller for sequencing into the airport. Also, in my experience when flying into Teterboro, all aircraft are given a VOR-A approach (circling VOR approach) in visual conditions by the approach facility, but after getting closer and calling the airport in sight, are then cleared for a visual approach. Again, my understanding is that this is done to facilitate arrival sequencing. -- Peter |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Questions pondered at 6500 feet
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message k.net... wrote in message oups.com... Here in Jackson Hole Wy I thought the same thing. We have several majors that fly into here and on those 100 miles+ visibility days they could fly a visual. So I asked some captains the same question. There answer was all the same ... Their airlines require them not to pick us a visual and stay in the "system" for safety reasons. Seems kinda silly since we have a very competent tower here. What "system" is it that they leave by selecting a visual approach but remain in if they select a SIAP? They probably do it for liability reasons so they can't be sued in an accident for deviating from an FAA approved approach, lawyer BS, blah, blah. ----------------------------------------- DW |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Questions pondered at 6500 feet
You're confusing a visual approach with VFR. The airlines do fly visual
approaches into JAC, they just don't fly VFR. wrote: Here in Jackson Hole Wy I thought the same thing. We have several majors that fly into here and on those 100 miles+ visibility days they could fly a visual. So I asked some captains the same question. There answer was all the same ... Their airlines require them not to pick us a visual and stay in the "system" for safety reasons. Seems kinda silly since we have a very competent tower here. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Questions pondered at 6500 feet
"Darkwing" theducksmail"AT"yahoo.com wrote in message ... They probably do it for liability reasons so they can't be sued in an accident for deviating from an FAA approved approach, lawyer BS, blah, blah. That would seem to favor the visual approach. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Questions pondered at 6500 feet
Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
"Stubby" wrote in message . .. I believe Lakehurst, NJ still has the circular field where the Hindenburg disaster happened. I used to see it out the right side of scheduled airliners on the way from DCA to BOS just before going over NYC. The question I have about this installation is what are the converging sets of lines around it. IIRC there are 3 sets of 4 lines pointing into the center of the circle. Are you referring to the large circular area to the west of the current runways? I don't believe that's where the Hindenburg disaster happened. That part of the installation was constructed well after the Hindenburg disaster. The big dirigible hangar, the blimp mooring circles, and the old runways were all located further east. Maybe. It has been a few years since I last saw it. If it's not an airship landing field, what is the large circular area? |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Questions pondered at 6500 feet
Yep. A boxing ring.
Jim "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message nk.net... A circle with corners? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I want to build the most EVIL plane EVER !!! | Eliot Coweye | Home Built | 237 | February 13th 06 03:55 AM |
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? | tom pettit | Home Built | 35 | September 29th 05 02:24 PM |
Mini-500 Accident Analysis | Dennis Fetters | Rotorcraft | 16 | September 3rd 05 11:35 AM |
gps to measure feet? | brucrx | Piloting | 19 | November 13th 04 03:33 AM |
Looking for Cessna Caravan pilots | [email protected] | Owning | 9 | April 1st 04 02:54 AM |