A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Questions pondered at 6500 feet



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old January 16th 06, 04:21 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Questions pondered at 6500 feet

I would hope the windsock is on the side or corner!

Which corner of the circle Nathan? :^)

Bryan "The Monk" Chaisone

  #32  
Old January 16th 06, 04:21 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Questions pondered at 6500 feet


"Nathan Young" wrote in message
...

I would hope the windsock is on the side or corner!


A circle with corners?


  #33  
Old January 16th 06, 04:36 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Questions pondered at 6500 feet


"Jay Honeck" wrote in message

Seems like a giant pain for the flight crew, to have to keep all the
various approach plates, etc., at hand.


My bag weighed 42 lbs.


  #34  
Old January 16th 06, 05:02 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Questions pondered at 6500 feet

On 2006-01-16, Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
Where's the pain? The approach in use will be on the ATIS, crews generally
have that information before they ever talk to approach control. And it is
a crew, it ain't one guy thumbing through a Jepp binder while trying to
hand-fly the airplane.


I also bet most of the crew know their regular approaches well, and
probably only pull out the plate to satisfy the airline's procedure.

--
Dylan Smith, Port St Mary, Isle of Man
Flying: http://www.dylansmith.net
Oolite-Linux: an Elite tribute: http://oolite-linux.berlios.de
Frontier Elite Universe: http://www.alioth.net
  #35  
Old January 16th 06, 05:06 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Questions pondered at 6500 feet

Jay Honeck wrote:

2. We often hear commercial airliners "cleared for the visual approach" into
thus-and-such an airport. However, we *also* often hear commercial
airliners "cleared for the ILS Rwy 14 approach" (for example) -- even though
conditions in the area are perfectly CAVU.


Jay, many times when flying back to my home airport I will request the
visual and still be vectored for the ILS and told to intercept the
localizer.

I had always assumed that this was done by the controller for sequencing
into the airport.

Also, in my experience when flying into Teterboro, all aircraft are given
a VOR-A approach (circling VOR approach) in visual conditions by the
approach facility, but after getting closer and calling the airport in
sight, are then cleared for a visual approach. Again, my understanding is
that this is done to facilitate arrival sequencing.

--
Peter
  #36  
Old January 16th 06, 05:11 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Questions pondered at 6500 feet


"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
k.net...

wrote in message
oups.com...

Here in Jackson Hole Wy I thought the same thing. We have several
majors that fly into here and on those 100 miles+ visibility days they
could fly a visual. So I asked some captains the same question. There
answer was all the same ... Their airlines require them not to pick us
a visual and stay in the "system" for safety reasons. Seems kinda silly
since we have a very competent tower here.


What "system" is it that they leave by selecting a visual approach but
remain in if they select a SIAP?


They probably do it for liability reasons so they can't be sued in an
accident for deviating from an FAA approved approach, lawyer BS, blah, blah.

-----------------------------------------
DW


  #37  
Old January 16th 06, 05:17 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Questions pondered at 6500 feet

You're confusing a visual approach with VFR. The airlines do fly visual
approaches into JAC, they just don't fly VFR.



wrote:

Here in Jackson Hole Wy I thought the same thing. We have several
majors that fly into here and on those 100 miles+ visibility days they
could fly a visual. So I asked some captains the same question. There
answer was all the same ... Their airlines require them not to pick us
a visual and stay in the "system" for safety reasons. Seems kinda silly
since we have a very competent tower here.

  #38  
Old January 16th 06, 05:18 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Questions pondered at 6500 feet


"Darkwing" theducksmail"AT"yahoo.com wrote in message
...

They probably do it for liability reasons so they can't be sued in an
accident for deviating from an FAA approved approach, lawyer BS, blah,
blah.


That would seem to favor the visual approach.


  #39  
Old January 16th 06, 05:35 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Questions pondered at 6500 feet

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
"Stubby" wrote in message
. ..

I believe Lakehurst, NJ still has the circular field where the Hindenburg
disaster happened. I used to see it out the right side of scheduled
airliners on the way from DCA to BOS just before going over NYC.

The question I have about this installation is what are the converging
sets of lines around it. IIRC there are 3 sets of 4 lines pointing into
the center of the circle.



Are you referring to the large circular area to the west of the current
runways? I don't believe that's where the Hindenburg disaster happened.
That part of the installation was constructed well after the Hindenburg
disaster. The big dirigible hangar, the blimp mooring circles, and the old
runways were all located further east.


Maybe. It has been a few years since I last saw it. If it's not an
airship landing field, what is the large circular area?
  #40  
Old January 16th 06, 05:42 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Questions pondered at 6500 feet

Yep. A boxing ring.

Jim




"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
nk.net...



A circle with corners?



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I want to build the most EVIL plane EVER !!! Eliot Coweye Home Built 237 February 13th 06 03:55 AM
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? tom pettit Home Built 35 September 29th 05 02:24 PM
Mini-500 Accident Analysis Dennis Fetters Rotorcraft 16 September 3rd 05 11:35 AM
gps to measure feet? brucrx Piloting 19 November 13th 04 03:33 AM
Looking for Cessna Caravan pilots [email protected] Owning 9 April 1st 04 02:54 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.