![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You may have seen some of my threads over the past 6-8 months, about an
unpredictable flakey radio problem I was having. It seemed to have been resolved by replacing a relay in the audio panel. I have flown the plane for a few months now, with no issues, until recently. I have encountered the same symptoms I was having in the past (no sidetone, when transmitting), but have been able to resolve it by moving the audio panel around (usually, pulling it halfway out, reseating it and tightening up the screw to secure it to the tray). I'm not sure if the relay was "ever" the problem, but all I know is that replacing it and putting the audio panel back in, bought me a few months of flying, which I was unable to get before, even after having removed and reseated the audio panel on several occaisions. My point??? I'm done! I want to jump into the IFR system and not constantly be worrying about how fresh my batteries are in my handheld, because it's only a matter of time before I'm lost comms! I currently have and old Cessna ARC audio panel, and a generic intercom with a volume knob, squelch knob and pilot isolation switch. I also have a Narco Mark 12D radio with VOR indicator, an INOP ADF, a standalone Narco NAV122 with LOC/GS, and an old standard Cessna transponder (altitude encoding). I don't have DME, which I would really like to have, and I don't have a second radio. This has directed my focus towards some day putting in a GNS 430, and getting both as a bonus, but that's just not in the budget at the moment! :-( What is probably most practical for me, is to do a few small things now and keep myself flying regularly, and make the big purchases down the road (hopefully). I don't, however, want to keep buying used/older equipment off of eBay or where-ever and get 3 more months of flying, only to be in the same boat 3 months later. My thought is a new audio panel with the intercom built in, and removing the old audio panel and intercom. I know there is some rewiring involved but don't know enough about it to appreciate what the extent of that would be? I would also like to have something installed that would be compatible with panel that would be a farily ideal end-state panel, after upgrades over the next few years. Is it reasonable to do what I am looking to do, in the $1500-$2000 range, or am I dreaming? (Just the audio panel/intercom upgrade, fully installed) I've solicited and received feedback on IFR certified GPS's in the past, but I'm not so sure an IFR certified GPS is a requirement for me? I've only considered the 430, to get DME and additional COM capabilities out of it. I would be completely happy with a handheld, but would need to consider an additional COM and DME with that in mind. I feel like a deer in the headlights here and have no idea which direction to go. Any and all feedback will be greatly appreciated. The one kicker for me is the budget. I'll probably have to go the upgrade vs. fix route and nibble away at it a little at a time, rather than drop it off for a major panel upgrade. I just want to make sure I'm nibbling toward an end goal, and not just hodgepodging a panel together, entirely out of budgetary constraints. My short term goal is to get back in the air and get some more IFR experience. I'm really not interested in getting some actual lost com experience... ;-) Thanks in advance for any recommendations! Todd |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
CAUTION. BLATANT COMMERCIAL HUCKSTERISM FOLLOWS.
www.rstengineering.com Have a gander at the RST-565. Jim Is it reasonable to do what I am looking to do, in the $1500-$2000 range, or am I dreaming? (Just the audio panel/intercom upgrade, fully installed) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() My thought is a new audio panel with the intercom built in, and removing the old audio panel and intercom. I know there is some rewiring involved but don't know enough about it to appreciate what the extent of that would be? I would also like to have something installed that would be compatible with panel that would be a farily ideal end-state panel, after upgrades over the next few years. Is it reasonable to do what I am looking to do, in the $1500-$2000 range, or am I dreaming? (Just the audio panel/intercom upgrade, fully installed) The one kicker for me is the budget. I'll probably have to go the upgrade vs. fix route and nibble away at it a little at a time, rather than drop it off for a major panel upgrade. I just want to make sure I'm nibbling toward an end goal, and not just hodgepodging a panel together, entirely out of budgetary constraints. Thanks in advance for any recommendations! Todd Hi Todd, The cost of install at a shop will likely be about equal to or a bit more than the cost of an audio panel/intercom. If you are trying to be cost conscious, look at install costs as well as the cost of the hardware. One thing to consider is that if you buy equipment used or from a discount seller, then take it in to a shop to install, the shop may not be too anxious to do the work. On the other hand, you may be able to do some of the work yourself, as long as it is supervised and approved by an IA. The simplest upgrade to your current panel might be to get a KMA20 or KMA24 from ebay and use it to replace your ARC unit. You have no guarantee on condition or serviceability of the unit. An IA would have to fill out a form 337 and submit it to OK City. This will list the airworthiness approval for the parts as well as installation methods - FAA AC 43-13. The equipment list and W&B need will be updated to reflect the change. I have done this in the past and it has worked out. However, I've worked in the aviation industry for over 25 years, have some applicable experience, and a good relationship with a local IA. We did everything by the book and the FAA approved the changes. Once you see the paper trail and detail work that is needed for such a job, you'll understand the cost drivers that go into equipment installation. If you are like most folks, you will need to have a shop do the installation. It would be good to find out ahead of time whether they expect to sell and install, or if they are willing to install customer furnished equipment. Since you already have an intercom and audio panel, you don't have to tear out the interior to run wires to mic/phone jacks, provided you already have them at all stations. The wiring that goes to the new audio/intercom is already behind the panel, and just needs to be terminated on the new connector. As I recall, the ARC audio panels are taller than current solid state units, so a tray replacement would either involve sliding other radios up, or a spacer of some type. As far as equipment goes, I can highly recommend the audio panels and intercoms from PS Engineering. I installed one of their intercoms in a plane I owned and liked it. I have one of their intercoms in my current plane, although I have a KMA 24 audio panel that was in the plane when I bought it. If I were buying a new audio panel, intercom or combo unit for my plane, PS Engineering would be my choice, based on my personal experience. There are others that make good equipment. If you just want a new replacement for your existing audio panel and intercom, they have some combination units that would work well, such as the PM6000. If you want to upgrade and pinch pennies, you might do as well by replacing the ARC audio panel with another audio panel, say a used KMA 24. Units on ebay run from $300-$600, and some come with a yellow tag, which would be needed on the form 337 entry to prove airworthiness. You could replace the old intercom with a new unit from PS Engineering or Sigtronics, probably around $400 new. Good luck, Brian |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() On the other hand, you may be able to do some of the work yourself, as long as it is supervised and approved by an IA. That is not true. An A&P can logbook enter a minor modification. An IA would have to fill out a form 337 and submit it to OK City. Only if your A&P is not skilled enough to avoid a paperwork blizzard. We did everything by the book and the FAA approved the changes. Once you see the paper trail and detail work that is needed for such a job, you'll understand the cost drivers that go into equipment installation. Once you understand that being paid $$ an hour for a paperwork mill is a lot easier than being paid the same $$ for sweating greasy wrenches, you will understand why a lot of mechanics choose to do their "work" in an air conditioned office with a pen. Hey, it's only your money, right? Units on ebay run from $300-$600, and some come with a yellow tag, which would be needed on the form 337 entry to prove airworthiness. The yellow tag means nothing other than that the unit met its internal specifications at the time it was tested. It has absolutely nothing to do with being airworthy. Jim A&P, IA |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Jim,
Mea Culpa - not intending to start a flame war, just respond to the original poster's request. All of the persons I know with IA are also A&Ps. As you correctly state, many skilled A&Ps can replace an existing component with one of a different manufacture and record it as a minor change in the logbook. In my own experience, some A&Ps are more skilled or motivated than others in making logbook entries. I have indeed installed equipment in my plane, under the supervision of an IA A&P. This work was recorded in the logbook, and a form 337 was completed and sent to OK City. The 337 is hardly a paperwork blizzard. It is one page, with standard blocks for information on the front, and a space on the back to describe the change. In my own case, it was pretty straightforward. I'm sure others have run into problems of one sort or another with the 337. Of course you are correct and precise about the yellow tag meaning that it has been checked to specifications. Airworthy parts have either PMA or TSO. The equipment I installed had PMA and a yellow tag (since it was not new equipment), which I stapled into the logbook. Brian |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "FlyWithTwo" wrote in message oups.com... All of the persons I know with IA are also A&Ps. The A&P is a requirement to hold an IA. As you correctly state, many skilled A&Ps can replace an existing component with one of a different manufacture and record it as a minor change in the logbook. To quote directly from an FAA Advisory Circular, "Whether a modification is major or minor is determined in part by the person responsible for the modification..." The 337 is hardly a paperwork blizzard. It is one page, with standard blocks for information on the front, and a space on the back to describe the change. In my own case, it was pretty straightforward. I'm sure others have run into problems of one sort or another with the 337. Having done a few dozen dozen 337s, I'm fairly familiar with what they look like. Try telling your "straightforward" to somebody like Jay Honeck who got gigged by a local FAA weenie on a 337 lamp installation. Of course you are correct and precise about the yellow tag meaning that it has been checked to specifications. Airworthy parts have either PMA or TSO. Oy, here we go again. Airworthy parts do not require PMA or TSO. Not. No. Nada. Nein. I have here in my hand a small piece of aluminum that I have drilled, bent, and alodined that is going to be part of a required engine baffling. That piece of aluminum had nothing but the alloy stamped on it when I started. Are you telling me that it is unairworthy because it wasn't made to PMA or TSO? Bzzzzt. Are you also telling me that it is going to require a 337 to bolt it onto the engine? Bzzzzt. Jim |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
FlyWithTwo wrote:
Hi Todd, Since you already have an intercom and audio panel, you don't have to tear out the interior to run wires to mic/phone jacks, provided you already have them at all stations. The wiring that goes to the new audio/intercom is already behind the panel, and just needs to be terminated on the new connector. I disagree. The wiring is no doubt incredibly old and the insulation, probably close to crumbling. What's the point of doing an upgrade of the electronics if the same 'transport medium' is used? Pull out the interior, and while you're at it, you have the opportunity to check the insulation against the airframe, make sure there's no corrosion, etc. As the owner, the interior comes under the category of owner-permitted maintenance. And, with the avionics A&P's supervision, you can also run new wiring at the same time. Take the time to do it right. I do agree wholeheartedly about the PSEngineering intercom. I put one in (rather, the avionics shop did) a few years ago and am very happy both with the unit and support from the company -- a number of the PSEng. people frequent this newsgroup, BTW. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks, so far, for the responses... I'm not ignoring them, just
digesting them... ;-) I'm not afraid of getting my hands dirty, but am thinking about the implications and the logistics of going down that road. Evening and weekends are really the only times I would be able to work on it, and I don't have any friends that are A&P's or IA's. My mechanic and another mechanic I know would not likely be excited to help me on evenings or weekends, just so I can save money. I would actually love to do something like this, and would love to know as much as possible about my airplane, and its systems, but I also recognize that my mechanic aquaintences have businesses to run and bills to pay, and helping me learn more about my airplane on their free time might not be a high priority for them. I haven't talked to any local avionics shops yet, as I was looking to get feedback here first, so I could have my ducks in a row. I don't know yet what a typical shops policy is on bringing in equipment and having them install it, as Brian pointed out. I would really like to have a long term plan, so that as components of the stack go belly up, I will already have some idea of what the plan was for that component anyway. Right now I just need an audio panel/intercom. I really need a second com too, but as Doug pointed out, I "could" plug a handheld into a music input of an intercom. My current intercom doesn't support that, but most new ones do seem to. I think my "long term" plan would include a second panel mounted com, with a handheld to be used in case of an electrical failure. ADF... Don't want it, don't need it. Would open up a lot of space in the stack if it weren't there. DME... I would like some kind of "legal" distance measuring display mechanism in the plane, as there are a lot of approaches that require DME, and many fixes that are not identifiable from a VOR(s). A handheld GPS will be a fantastic addition for situational awareness, but doesn't make for a legal option when DME is required I "am" willing to take the time and do it right, but certain financial limitations apply. If somone's interpretation of doing it right is installing a $30,000 Garmin stack, that just would not be possible. However if replacing the wire, while replacing the component is doing it right, then I'm in... It would just be a matter of working out the previous logistical issues and doing it myself or making that one of the requirements for any avionics shop that might be doing the work for me. Thanks for the responses! I'm still feeling a bit like a wide-eyed deer looking into the light, but this too shall pass. Best Regards, Todd |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is how I have done the 182, the 172 before that, and the 170 before
that. Radios will change. Audio panels will change. Intercoms will change. The 182 started out life with a 90 channel MK-12 and a Lear ADF. By my count, it has gone through 43 separate and individual avionics changes in its 50 year history. That's about one every year or so. None of the radios in the 182 are directly connected to the audio panel, and I have dual King 170Bs, an amateur (ham) 2 meter rig, and an XM satellite music radio all running through the audio panel. Here's the deal, and terminal strip is the mantra. Call up www.mouser.com and search for "Cinch series 140" (without the quotation marks). It will tell you that to see the device click on "page 1137". If you are on dialup, this page will take about a minute to load. Every radio has its own personal 8-pin terminal strip. Power, ground, speaker, phones, mic audio, mic key, lights, and a spare. But it doesn't stop there. Go back to the Mouser search page and search for "Molex .062" " (without the quotation marks but with the "inch mark after .062). This is a series of small nylon connectors that go for a couple of bucks each. Been using both terminal strips and nylon connectors for forty years without a single failure. Now, the radio comes with a horrendously expensive (and generally made out of unobtanium) connector. That connector gets wired to an "intermediate" nylon connector, and the nylon connector gets wired to the terminal strip. The terminal strip also gets wired to the audio panel. Thus, to change audio panels, I simply remove the wires from the terminal strips and run the new wires to the terminal strips. TO change a radio, I simply wire the new radio connector into one half of the intermediate connector and it is done. The terminal strips all reside on a sheet of thin aluminum that is bolted to the bottom of the radio rack. Why the bottom? Because if I'm having trouble with a radio, all the connections to the radio are right there in plain sight for troubleshooting. I do not claim inventor rights to the terminal strip idea. I got it from working on Baby Boeings. That is how Boeing makes connections. I do claim inventor rights to the intermediate "Karmic Connector" idea. (Karmic is what my editor at Kitplanes named it ... it stands for "Kitplanes Aircraft Radio Middle Intermediate Connector" or some other hogwash like that. As to your friendly local A&P, nobody ever said that they need to be looking over your shoulder every step of the way. So long as you go in with a plan that they can see, and that they can observe, and once you earn their trust, you go in with the plan and they inspect the final product weeks or months later. Some tips: Get yourself a Mouser print catalog by calling them up and asking for one. We dye the connectors to color code them for male and female pins -- nylon will dye red, black, green, yellow, blue ... in Rit fabric dye at room temperature in a couple of days, or in hot water in a couple of minutes. Use crimp terminals on all the wires at the terminal blocks. A plain old ten dollar crimp tool can make every bit as good a connection as the $150 ratchet crimp tool. When you put the male and female pins on the wires for the nylon connectors, crimp AND solder them. Get a shareware schematic drawing program for your wiring diagrams -- your mechanic will be impressed. Last ... you are wondering what second radio to put in. While you are wondering, I have a perfectly good Com-11 that is gathering dust on the shelf. You are welcome to borrow it until you decide, but a decent older Narking radio on ebay is not a bad deal. Finally, if you get REAL serious about this stuff and understand that I won't be available to answer questions right away, and as I understand it you live in Georgetown about 20 miles south of me, I'll take on the inspection job IF you report blow-by-blow progress to this newsgroup. I'll even loan you the schematic drawing program with a couple of samples from the 182 files. It would be nice if we could figure out how to ferry the airplane up to Grass Valley for the inspections, then you fly it home with the signoff (or a list of squawks to clean up). No matter WHOSE audio panel you use, or WHOSE radio you use, it will be absolutely mandatory for you to find a pinout of the connector. A good starting place is Bob Nuckoll's page at www.aeroelectric.com . Interested? Jim (Jav, ya wanna chime in here?) "three-eight-hotel" wrote in message oups.com... Thanks, so far, for the responses... I'm not ignoring them, just digesting them... ;-) I'm not afraid of getting my hands dirty, but am thinking about the implications and the logistics of going down that road. Evening and weekends are really the only times I would be able to work on it, and I don't have any friends that are A&P's or IA's. My mechanic and another mechanic I know would not likely be excited to help me on evenings or weekends, just so I can save money. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
("RST Engineering" wrote)
It would be nice if we could figure out how to ferry the airplane up to Grass Valley for the inspections, then you fly it home with the signoff (or a list of squawks to clean up). Nice write-up Jim. I've saved it to my FLYING folder. Some day I need to sub-divide that FLYING folder - it's getting full. This is where I'm a horrible, horrible person. I suggest - from 1,280.5 nm away... In the none too distant futu Mark things INOP. Fly plane 20 miles north, up to Grass Valley (GOO!!!) .... just a minute, I need to clear my eyes and catch my breath. GOO? Ok. I'm goo-d to go. Oops, no I'm not. Hehehehehe. Ahhhhh ...[sigh] ..."whew!" Anyway. Plane will be waiting for person who will be doing the inspection. Get inspected. Plane, too. [Review squawk list, if any] Get sign-off. Fly home. Do not make eye contact and do not speak to anyone at your local field. Return home. Shower. Am I bad? Montblack |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
time for avionics upgrade... | kontiki | Owning | 12 | December 11th 04 06:15 PM |
avionics shop - NJ, Eastern PA, IFR GPS | Ken | Owning | 11 | January 22nd 04 06:36 PM |
Used Avionics | O. Sami Saydjari | Instrument Flight Rules | 40 | December 2nd 03 02:53 PM |
F-8 avionics | Zajcevi | Military Aviation | 0 | August 20th 03 11:00 PM |