A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

tail ballast antifreeze



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old June 30th 06, 02:18 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default tail ballast antifreeze

I have seen gliders with frozen tail tanks.

I always used to use plain old automotive anti-freeze in the tail tank
as it wont attack GRP or rubber and 1-2 gallons at 10-20% mix released
as an aerosol at 10,000ft is not going to harm anything!!

Also be aware that the wings with their foam cores are like thermos
flasks, just be sure to not have any dripping valves or dump water
above the freezing layer.
Tail tanks however are usually single skinned and can be frozen
relatively easily.

Regards

Al


wrote:
I've read the past posts on using ~20% methanol to prevent tail ballast
from freezing. I have these questions three:

1) Is methanol in any way corrosive to rubber parts/seals?

2) Is there a reason not to use ethanol if methanol can't be found?

3) Does a glider flying in the Great Basin area in July, between 15k
and 18k for 7+ hours, really need tail ballast anti-freeze?

~ted/2NO


  #32  
Old June 30th 06, 05:56 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default tail ballast antifreeze

At 23:48 28 June 2006, Denis wrote:

you're right, but I suspect that thermal inertia is
even more important
than radiation.


Technically there's no such thing as thermal inertia.
You probably mean thermal capacitence.

If thermal inertia existed the ground would keep getting
hotter even after the sun goes down - great for longer
soaring days!

9B



  #33  
Old June 30th 06, 02:16 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default tail ballast antifreeze


"Andy Blackburn" wrote in message
...
At 23:48 28 June 2006, Denis wrote:

you're right, but I suspect that thermal inertia is
even more important
than radiation.


Technically there's no such thing as thermal inertia.
You probably mean thermal capacitence.

If thermal inertia existed the ground would keep getting
hotter even after the sun goes down - great for longer
soaring days!

9B


Interesting discussion on Dr. Jack's site re a related topic to this.....why
do clouds keep developing after sunset? Best answer I saw there (from Dr.
Jack) was that the sun no longer is heating the upper areas of the cloud so
it cools rapidly providing a continuing temperature gradient inspite of the
lower air not heating any further.

Casey Lenox
KC
Phoenix


  #34  
Old June 30th 06, 02:37 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default tail ballast antifreeze

Andy Blackburn a écrit :
At 23:48 28 June 2006, Denis wrote:


Technically there's no such thing as thermal inertia.
You probably mean thermal capacitence.


right - so much for me ;-)

BTW I did not try it but I read calcium chloride is a good anti-freeze
for wings and tail ballasts, not too bad for pipes or environment. Down
to - 40°C depending mixing ratio. It is what is used in common
anti-moisture products. Be aware that mixing with water release a lot of
heat and has to be made outside the wings...

--
Denis

R. Parce que ça rompt le cours normal de la conversation !!!
Q. Pourquoi ne faut-il pas répondre au-dessus de la question ?
  #36  
Old April 27th 11, 05:22 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Rob Brown
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default tail ballast antifreeze


Just in case you are still wondering ...

On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 at 02:04 -0000, Gary Emerson wrote:

Francisco De Almeida wrote:
The German manufacturers would rather have their customers release
the = tail ballast at +2=BAC. I suspect solar radiation is the
reason why = people can keep their water at lower air temperatures
without = immediately being awarded a split tailplane. So if you
have both outside temperatures below 2=BAC and no sunlight ... =
beware!


What's +2=BAC and 2=BAC for the clueless?


=BA is the degree symbol, IE the superscript circle. So Francisco was
saying "+2 degrees C" and "2 degrees C"


--

Rob Brown b r o w n a t g m c l d o t c o m
G. Michaels Consulting Ltd. (780)438-9343 (voice)
Edmonton (780)437-3367 (FAX)
http://gmcl.com/

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I want to build the most EVIL plane EVER !!! Eliot Coweye Home Built 237 February 13th 06 03:55 AM
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? tom pettit Home Built 35 September 29th 05 02:24 PM
Mini-500 Accident Analysis Dennis Fetters Rotorcraft 16 September 3rd 05 11:35 AM
AH64 tail rotor CivetOne Rotorcraft 3 October 23rd 03 07:18 PM
The prone postion for tail gunners versus turrets. The Enlightenment Military Aviation 8 July 22nd 03 11:01 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.