![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .com,
"Steve - KDMW" wrote: Question... I have to do a lot of regional travel for my company and, due to the work we do, most of my work is actually at airports. I've asked my company if I can use my personal aircraft for a lot of this travel and they denied my request due to what the company percieves as their liability in the matter. Is my company misguided or do they really have some liability if I use my airplane instead of my car for regional travel? What's the difference between me crashing my airplane into a school (their example) or plowing my car into the same school's bus stop? fwiw, the MITRE corporation does allow the use of small aircraft. Prior permission is required (at some Officer level) and naming the company on your insurance (of at least $1,000,000). I've only been able to arrange to use an airplane 4 times for business travel (the first three before I owned my airplane). -- Bob Noel Looking for a sig the lawyers will hate |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steve - KDMW" wrote in message oups.com... : Question... : : I have to do a lot of regional travel for my company and, due to the : work we do, most of my work is actually at airports. I've asked my : company if I can use my personal aircraft for a lot of this travel and : they denied my request due to what the company percieves as their : liability in the matter. : : Is my company misguided or do they really have some liability if I use : my airplane instead of my car for regional travel? What's the : difference between me crashing my airplane into a school (their : example) or plowing my car into the same school's bus stop? : : Steve : CP - ASEL/IA : PA28-151 : N43291 : The company I work for will not allow use of a personal aircraft for company business. Also, they provide a life insurance policy for all employees, and you guessed it, it will not pay if you die in a private plane. You can die in a motorcycle crash, but not a light plane. Makes no sense.... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
..Blueskies. wrote:
"Steve - KDMW" wrote in message oups.com... : Question... : : I have to do a lot of regional travel for my company and, due to the : work we do, most of my work is actually at airports. I've asked my : company if I can use my personal aircraft for a lot of this travel and : they denied my request due to what the company percieves as their : liability in the matter. : : Is my company misguided or do they really have some liability if I use : my airplane instead of my car for regional travel? What's the : difference between me crashing my airplane into a school (their : example) or plowing my car into the same school's bus stop? : : Steve : CP - ASEL/IA : PA28-151 : N43291 : The company I work for will not allow use of a personal aircraft for company business. Also, they provide a life insurance policy for all employees, and you guessed it, it will not pay if you die in a private plane. You can die in a motorcycle crash, but not a light plane. Makes no sense.... Of course it does, airplanes are scary, but at least they are not as scary as my .22 target pistol... Common sense is not very common in this day and age. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
When I asked my company if I could use private planes for business travel,
they said no. Then I looked at our policy. There was no exclusion. So I asked a different question, "show me where it says that your not covered." The end result is that the company agreed that private plane travel is sanctioned for business and that our AD&D policy covers it for personal use. That was many years ago. Since then, they have changed carriers many times and each time they have received explicit inclusionary clauses. I don't take credit for it, half of the executives either use or own private aircraft. -- ------------------------------- Travis Lake N3094P PWK |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7 Nov 2006 05:34:37 -0800, "Steve - KDMW"
wrote: Is my company misguided or do they really have some liability if I use my airplane instead of my car for regional travel? What's the difference between me crashing my airplane into a school (their example) or plowing my car into the same school's bus stop? Thanks for the post, and everyone who responded. This came up for me a couple months ago and the company paid $1,000 for me to fly commercial when it would have cost only about $300 for me to fly myself. I was pretty frustrated and have been wondering why they would exclude use of personal aircraft ever since. This thread has given me some insight as to why. z |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Long ago in a Galaxy Far, Far Away...when I worked for Boeing (and it
really wasn't that long ago) we had to take 15 employees (2 managers and the rest engineers) on a trip to meet customers. Our in-house travel agency couldn't figure out what was going on, since we had to change the dates repeatedly over the 2 month period. I finally took over all the planning (logistics - no big deal, I ran it as if it was an engineering project!) On a lark, I called Seattle and asked about "borrowing" one of the jets that the Executives use. Turns out that yes, we could make arrangements and use it at the same billed cost as the execs. The overall cost would have been 50% *cheaper* than flying commercial. Why? Because due to the changing schedule, we had to pay full-fare in order to mitigate changing the flights. For some strange reason, my boss was *not* surprised I did this, but would not take it to our director (just under the VP level). Bummer. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Blanche" wrote in message ... : Long ago in a Galaxy Far, Far Away...when I worked for Boeing (and it : really wasn't that long ago) we had to take 15 employees (2 managers and : the rest engineers) on a trip to meet customers. Our in-house travel : agency couldn't figure out what was going on, since we had to change : the dates repeatedly over the 2 month period. I finally took over : all the planning (logistics - no big deal, I ran it as if it was an : engineering project!) : : On a lark, I called Seattle and asked about "borrowing" one of the : jets that the Executives use. Turns out that yes, we could make : arrangements and use it at the same billed cost as the execs. The : overall cost would have been 50% *cheaper* than flying commercial. : Why? Because due to the changing schedule, we had to pay full-fare in : order to mitigate changing the flights. : : For some strange reason, my boss was *not* surprised I did this, but : would not take it to our director (just under the VP level). : : Bummer. Any employee in our company can try to book a flight on the company jets. There is even a rudimentary reservation system. The catch is that there has to be enough demand locally and the planes need to be passing by. Sounds good until you actually try to use it. Imagine, the CEO is on board, but we are going to stop by Kalamazoo to pick up a design engineer that needs to go to Cleveland... |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
..Blueskies. wrote:
"Blanche" wrote in message ... : Long ago in a Galaxy Far, Far Away...when I worked for Boeing (and it : really wasn't that long ago) we had to take 15 employees (2 managers and : the rest engineers) on a trip to meet customers. Our in-house travel : agency couldn't figure out what was going on, since we had to change : the dates repeatedly over the 2 month period. I finally took over : all the planning (logistics - no big deal, I ran it as if it was an : engineering project!) : : On a lark, I called Seattle and asked about "borrowing" one of the : jets that the Executives use. Turns out that yes, we could make : arrangements and use it at the same billed cost as the execs. The : overall cost would have been 50% *cheaper* than flying commercial. : Why? Because due to the changing schedule, we had to pay full-fare in : order to mitigate changing the flights. : : For some strange reason, my boss was *not* surprised I did this, but : would not take it to our director (just under the VP level). : : Bummer. Any employee in our company can try to book a flight on the company jets. There is even a rudimentary reservation system. The catch is that there has to be enough demand locally and the planes need to be passing by. Sounds good until you actually try to use it. Imagine, the CEO is on board, but we are going to stop by Kalamazoo to pick up a design engineer that needs to go to Cleveland... I used to work for General Dynamics and when there was a group of 10 or so who had to go from San Diego to LA for a evening meeting of a Tech Society we were able to use a corporate aircraft for it. This was long before I started flying and I did not know the benefits of GA but it a no brainer for this flight as we all worked a full day, flew up for the meeting and returned that night. All we had to do was submit the request and have the various sign offs but it worked well for us. This was in the 80s so who knows what the process would be now. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Up until the Compaq merger, Hewlett-Packard used to have an "employee
pilot" program. Some of the requirements were pretty stiff (time, annual checkride with the company chief pilot, high insurance liability coverage) and were designed to discourage VFR weekend pilots from using their aircraft for business trips. Nevertheless, it was a reasonable program for semi-professional pilots. Since the influx of the Compaq management however, that program has been completely cancelled. Even though being lobbied to re-authorize the program, HP's current management has turned a deaf ear. -----Original Message----- From: .Blueskies. ] Posted At: Friday, November 17, 2006 7:28 PM Posted To: rec.aviation.owning Conversation: Companies Allowing Employees to Fly Subject: Companies Allowing Employees to Fly "Blanche" wrote in message ... : Long ago in a Galaxy Far, Far Away...when I worked for Boeing (and it : really wasn't that long ago) we had to take 15 employees (2 managers and : the rest engineers) on a trip to meet customers. Our in-house travel : agency couldn't figure out what was going on, since we had to change : the dates repeatedly over the 2 month period. I finally took over : all the planning (logistics - no big deal, I ran it as if it was an : engineering project!) : : On a lark, I called Seattle and asked about "borrowing" one of the : jets that the Executives use. Turns out that yes, we could make : arrangements and use it at the same billed cost as the execs. The : overall cost would have been 50% *cheaper* than flying commercial. : Why? Because due to the changing schedule, we had to pay full-fare in : order to mitigate changing the flights. : : For some strange reason, my boss was *not* surprised I did this, but : would not take it to our director (just under the VP level). : : Bummer. Any employee in our company can try to book a flight on the company jets. There is even a rudimentary reservation system. The catch is that there has to be enough demand locally and the planes need to be passing by. Sounds good until you actually try to use it. Imagine, the CEO is on board, but we are going to stop by Kalamazoo to pick up a design engineer that needs to go to Cleveland... |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7 Nov 2006 05:34:37 -0800, "Steve - KDMW"
wrote: Question... I have to do a lot of regional travel for my company and, due to the work we do, most of my work is actually at airports. I've asked my company if I can use my personal aircraft for a lot of this travel and they denied my request due to what the company percieves as their liability in the matter. Is my company misguided or do they really have some liability if I use my airplane instead of my car for regional travel? What's the I worked for a large multi national chemical corporation. We had Two jets and a turboprop. When it came to flying on a business for themselves even the pilots were not allowed to serve as crew in any capacity. difference between me crashing my airplane into a school (their example) or plowing my car into the same school's bus stop? Company lawyers and insurance companies is the difference. Plus airplanes are a much higher profile than cars. We accept multi-car pileups as just the cost of doing business. The public would be and usually is, up in arms when a small plane hits the free way if there is an altercation between the plane and someone's car. Steve CP - ASEL/IA PA28-151 N43291 Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
From the Jim Campbell, Captain Zoom archives (all of 6 years ago) | Mick | Home Built | 49 | February 3rd 06 03:27 PM |
Aviation Conspiracy: FAA Calls Controller Whistleblowers "Rogue Employees!!! | Bill Mulcahy | General Aviation | 0 | March 31st 05 04:29 AM |