![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
yup have one of those also and yes it cannot be beat...
but still for inflight use I like the smaller red or green that I have on a lanyard Newps wrote: I bought two of these. http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/LED-P...QQcmdZViewItem Morgans wrote: "napd" wrote I also carry a mini mag light for the preflight. I know you can't beat the mini-mag, for size and performance, but I have a hot tip for you. Get a replacement bulb for the big mag lights, or you can by one with the new bulb in it. Mine is a 3 cell, but they also make it in 4 cell; I don't remember about other sizes. The magical bulb I speak of is a 3 watt LED, and I'm telling you, you have to see it to believe it. Color, the brilliance of white - like daylight. Brightness, like you would not believe. Check it out. A little under 20 bucks, for just the bulb. Worth every penny, especially for something like a preflight, where it is "nice" to be able to see into every nook and cranny, with clarity. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "napd" wrote in message yup have one of those also and yes it cannot be beat... but still for inflight use I like the smaller red or green that I have on a lanyard In-flight, sure, no super-bright needed, or wanted! g With 9 lights, I'll bet it is decent. I still wonder how many watts it is, overall. I have some multi LED lights. (I'm a REAL flashlight junkie) I still could not believe the brilliance of the single 3 watt bulb. The brightness is one factor. The color of the light is the real eye-opener. See if you can find someone that has the 3 watt mag-light bulb in a 3 or more D cell flashlight. Compare your 9 light vs. the 1 light, side by side. My guess is that you will be as impressed as I was, still. You have to see it to believe it. Someone who has both, compare, and let us know what you think. I am curious, to be sure! -- Jim in NC |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
napd wrote:
I like the led style that I can hang around my neck red or green color. easy to find stay away from the one light multi colors... unless it has a foolproof switch system you spend more time fumbling for the right switch nothing worse than trying for red or green and getting white ... Those things are so good on batteries that I usually leave mine on. I also "dimmed" mine by adding layers of tape over the LED's. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't know whether many have seen these, but WalMart has finger lights for
less than $2 each. They are little LEDs with batteries. The case has two little velcro straps to hook around your finger. I have two clipped to the outside of my flight bag. I haven't used them in the airplane, as I don't fly at night that often, but they worked great during a power failure. The light is blue-white, and would need to be filtered if you want red light. "napd" wrote in message s.com... Hi, Well everyone has given great advice which I agree with. The only thing that I can add is this COCKPIT ORGANIZATION by this I mean know were everything is without having to go fishing for it. in a dark cockpit it can be difficult or impossible to have to go looking for things in your flight bag. The only other thing I can add is have at least two flashlights and spare batteries. I date mine when they are put in and they are replaced every year or sooner depending on usage.. I like the led style that I can hang around my neck red or green color. easy to find stay away from the one light multi colors... unless it has a foolproof switch system you spend more time fumbling for the right switch nothing worse than trying for red or green and getting white ... I also carry a mini mag light for the preflight. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Unless you are close enough to suitable landing terrain and know where
it is located there is little use in flying higher as you can't see where you are going to land any way, but that depends on the terrain, visibility, and availability of nearby airports. That depends on how low you fly during the day, doesn't it? ![]() the day it's generally safe to fly below the tops of nearby terrain since you can see it. At night this is somewhat less bright. Also, additional altitude gives more time to troubleshoot and solve a problem with the fan. It may take longer at night just because of the visibility issues. Jose -- "There are 3 secrets to the perfect landing. Unfortunately, nobody knows what they are." - (mike). for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 09:39:21 -0500, Jose
wrote: Unless you are close enough to suitable landing terrain and know where it is located there is little use in flying higher as you can't see where you are going to land any way, but that depends on the terrain, visibility, and availability of nearby airports. That depends on how low you fly during the day, doesn't it? ![]() the day it's generally safe to fly below the tops of nearby terrain since you can see it. At night this is somewhat less bright. Depends on where you are flying. Around here you'd need a fair amount of gas just to get where you could safely find a spot where you could fly below the tops of surrounding terrain. Even flying *very* low over sparsely populated areas I'd need to go about 60 miles to get that low without worrying about hitting telephone lines and cell phone towers. Also, additional altitude gives more time to troubleshoot and solve a problem with the fan. It may take longer at night just because of the visibility issues. The only complete engine failure I've had was close to the ground as in between 30 and 50 feet. I did the trouble shooting without ever looking at the switches and valves. It didn't restart any way. It had a blown diaphragm in the fuel distribution spider on top of the engine. Jose Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Air Force Aerial Refueling Methods: Flying Boom versus Hose-and-Drogue | Mike | Naval Aviation | 26 | July 11th 06 11:38 PM |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
Israeli Air Force to lose Middle East Air Superiority Capability to the Saudis in the near future | Jack White | Military Aviation | 71 | September 21st 03 02:58 PM |