![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The deal is this: I wanted to fly a loop in my M20J for a long time,
but it's hard to get around the 30 degree pitch limitation certifications and do a loop. isn't it? MSFS2004 offers an M20M Bravo! And Comp USA is selling that program for less than $20. So the four disks came in a couple of days ago, and got loaded into my laptop. Problem 1: no number pad for pitch and bank. I messed around with the C172 model and found the up down, left and right arrows did all of that, although I did not locate a key for return to neutral. OK, so I played student pilot and F3ed full throttle in a 172, figured out how to take off and land. TT maybe 15 minutes, and not an enriching experience. Loaded in the M20M Bravo. This beast gets yanked around the sky with a IO 540, my 201 does it with a IO 360. Lots more fuel usage, and a lot more airplane than I can afford in RL. Never the less, I called up KBED RR 29, and there I was, at the controls, position and hold! Neat. No checklist at hand, so I did the best I could with cowl flaps, wing flaps, trim, fuel pump, and the like, so it looked like this airplane just might fly. Hold down F3, RPMs came up nicely, and nothing happened! Message flashed -- parking brake is set, press . to release. What frigging pilot pulls onto the active and sets the parking brake? OK, I put a period to the program, and started to roll, feet twitching because with an IO 540 this thing should want to turn really badly -- in the M20J I used rudder mostly to keep it on centerline during the early part of the takeoff roll, figured my little left and right arrows would have to do the job here. The Bravo tracked straight down the centerline without any help from me! This is supposed to be an accurate simulation, with no P effects? Gimme a break. OK, I down arrowed at 70 kts -- this takes a lot more rotation (read that as down arrow) than did the 172, I don't think I broke free until about 90, way too fast! Set up a straight ahead climb right out the 11 localizer, my memory claimed the student practice area was a bit to the north of the 11 29 extended centerline. Is there anything more boring than watching a simulated climb to 7000 feet? Like watching grass grow. My plan was to reach altitude, dive the thing down at 45 degrees, let the speed climb to top of the green, then hold down the down arrow, and when I was at the top of the loop close the throttle, pray a little, and try to recover smoothly at the bottom. Guys who have flown aerobatics know the way you do them is look at the horizon to the side. I worried about that a little, since the side image was going to be in front of me, but it turned out to be a non issue. I couldn't figure out how to get that side view. The hell with it. I pushed over, and the speed went up really fast! Mooneys are aerodynamicly clean GA airplanes. I downarrowed (which means yoke in my lap, I think) and watched the windscreen view change from ground to sky, saw the AH tumble, saw the ground in the top half of the windscreen, closed the throttle, and somewhere near the bottom went forward stick. It was NOT pretty. I didn't have that side view I wanted. I still don't know how at one point I wound up in a 60 degree bank! Never the less, I got back to straight and level, and remember having started the dive from 7000 feet was more than a little suprised to find the airplane was at a simulated altitude of 5500. The guy who showed me some things in a 150 Aerobat would have been ashamed of me. Never the less, I did a loop. About then the phone rang, and a friend suggested I meet with him and a few others for lunch. That sounded good. The sim was paused 30 miles or so from BED, After I got back to my home office there were some other matters that needed attention and computer memory. Exit sim That's it. It was as fulfilling an experience for me as eating cotton candy -- there just wasn't much there. It simply didn't provide the kinds of feedback I'd want, and I'm not going to buy a yoke with force feedback and rudder peddles (sims who use a joystick instead of a yoke in airplanes that come with yokes are another step removed from at least what is my reality. For those of you who get pleasure from the MSFS, more power to you. It did not work for me. There is a possiblity my mind has been poisoned to the sim experience, but probably not, I hoped it might be fun ro do on late nights. Oh well, it was a $20 experiment. The good news is, that was cheap. Most of my 'experiments' cost a lot more than that. Want to know how to burn some VC's couple million in a startup venture? Talk to me! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
real life use of general aviation for this newsgroup | Tony | Piloting | 29 | February 9th 07 01:38 AM |
Real Life (in IMC) IFR training | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 36 | November 29th 06 02:03 PM |
REAL NAVY LIFE | B.C. Mallam | Naval Aviation | 2 | February 10th 05 01:20 AM |
Any real-life advice on inflight refueling? | tscottme | Naval Aviation | 5 | November 17th 04 03:56 PM |
Real-life flight planning | Paul Folbrecht | Piloting | 34 | February 10th 04 06:08 PM |