A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Air-dams/strakes on Stealth AC



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old November 13th 03, 05:24 PM
Scott Ferrin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Why do you post here, Ferrin? Your trolling is of poor quality, you have no
knowledge of the subject, and you never served. What about being a server
administrator qualifys you to post difinitively at ram?



A typically clueless Tarver post. What the hell makes you think I'm a
server admin.?
  #32  
Old November 13th 03, 05:25 PM
Scott Ferrin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 08:47:27 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"
wrote:


"Chad Irby" wrote in message
m...
In article ,
"Tarver Engineering" wrote:

Perhaps the wing dams were replaced with a titanium tail, but the only

place
I have seen that is at ram. What I am posting is public sector in the

news
type information.


You vaguely remember some photot of air dams from some test flight a few
years back, so *all* F-series aircraft have them...


But Chad, the 8-inch strakes were not added to the F-22 until last year.



SHOW US THE PICTURES **** HEAD. Oh wait, I forgot, they're all
secretly hidden in Hanger 18.
  #33  
Old November 13th 03, 05:30 PM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Scott Ferrin" wrote in message
...

Why do you post here, Ferrin? Your trolling is of poor quality, you have

no
knowledge of the subject, and you never served. What about being a

server
administrator qualifys you to post difinitively at ram?



A typically clueless Tarver post. What the hell makes you think I'm a
server admin.?


I still have your email from when I started posting on this board.

Now, back to the subject at hand, Ferrin. Why would you feel that you have
any business replying to me on an airplane technical matter? It is clear to
me after so much time that you are not much above willshaw as a participant
at ram. I see no basis upopn which you are participating in this thread,
outside your being a troll.


  #34  
Old November 13th 03, 05:30 PM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Scott Ferrin" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 08:47:27 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"
wrote:


"Chad Irby" wrote in message
m...
In article ,
"Tarver Engineering" wrote:

Perhaps the wing dams were replaced with a titanium tail, but the

only
place
I have seen that is at ram. What I am posting is public sector in

the
news
type information.

You vaguely remember some photot of air dams from some test flight a

few
years back, so *all* F-series aircraft have them...


But Chad, the 8-inch strakes were not added to the F-22 until last year.


SHOW US THE PICTURES **** HEAD. Oh wait, I forgot, they're all
secretly hidden in Hanger 18.


Each airframe has it's own dog house.

Do you suppose Scott is just a lun?


  #35  
Old November 13th 03, 06:24 PM
Chad Irby
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
"Tarver Engineering" wrote:

You don't even know the history of the F-22's developmnet problems, Irby.


The thing is that I kept paying attention to them *after* they started
fixing them, instead of just assuming that they never got fixed, as you
did.

There were in fact strakes on some F-22s between the time the tail cracks
were found in the F-22 and vehicle 18's production.


For a short time, and they were removed after they figured out what was
happening. You didn't seem to know that, though. You also don't seem
to know that there are actually public photos of the planes, released on
a regular basis. And that they fly these planes, in daylight, wher
epeople get to see them all of the time.

Do you post here as an expert to be clueless, or are you just a liar, Chad?


Once again, you're really an idiot.

--
cirby at cfl.rr.com

Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations.
Slam on brakes accordingly.
  #36  
Old November 13th 03, 06:25 PM
Chad Irby
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
"Tarver Engineering" wrote:

But Chad, the 8-inch strakes were not added to the F-22 until last year.


....and then removed.

As is obvious from photos from *this* year.

--
cirby at cfl.rr.com

Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations.
Slam on brakes accordingly.
  #37  
Old November 13th 03, 06:26 PM
Chad Irby
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
"Tarver Engineering" wrote:

Each airframe has it's own dog house.


....and according to Tarver, they *never* leave, evne when flying on a
regular basis...

--
cirby at cfl.rr.com

Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations.
Slam on brakes accordingly.
  #38  
Old November 13th 03, 06:28 PM
Scott Ferrin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Now, back to the subject at hand, Ferrin. Why would you feel that you have
any business replying to me on an airplane technical matter? It is clear to
me after so much time that you are not much above willshaw as a participant
at ram. I see no basis upopn which you are participating in this thread,
outside your being a troll.



I'll bet if we had a vote you'd get voted off the island and I'd still
be here. You've demonstrated on numerous ocassions that just because
you sweep the floors in a place where they make airplanes doesn't mean
you know **** about them.
  #39  
Old November 13th 03, 06:31 PM
Scott Ferrin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Each airframe has it's own dog house.


Show me a picture of an F-22 parked in it's "doghouse" and I'll show
you five where they're not. And the shed where they test the engines
isn't one of the so called doghouses you mention either.





Do you suppose Scott is just a lun?



A lun? What the hell is that? Looks like your knowledge of the
english language is right up there with your knowledge of aircraft.
  #40  
Old November 13th 03, 06:44 PM
Scott Ferrin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 07:40:10 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"
wrote:


"Chad Irby" wrote in message
m...
In article ,
"Tarver Engineering" wrote:

You don't know much about photgraphing airplanes do you, Irby.


Way more than you, moron.


You don't even know the history of the F-22's developmnet problems, Irby.
There were in fact strakes on some F-22s between the time the tail cracks
were found in the F-22 and vehicle 18's production.



Oh this is rich. Tell me exactly which ones had the strakes and I'll
show you a picture with it non strakes.

I've got pics of 1,2,5,7,8,10,11,12,14,15 and 18 and none of them have
strakes. Let me guess, it was 4,6,9, and 13 that had them right? Can
you produce ONE picture of an F-22 with strakes? Didn't think so.
But hey you sure do know about airplanes huh?


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stealth homebuilt C J Campbell Home Built 1 September 15th 04 08:43 AM
Israeli Stealth??? Kenneth Williams Military Aviation 92 October 22nd 03 04:28 PM
Impact of Eurofighters in the Middle East Quant Military Aviation 164 October 4th 03 04:33 PM
Wind Turbines and stealth Arved Sandstrom Military Aviation 6 August 8th 03 10:30 AM
UK/US Stealth Tank robert arndt Military Aviation 6 July 2nd 03 05:58 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.