![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
For my conclusion I am fixed in the stall + yaw = spin (where I was to start
with). I appreciate the references to the Transport Canada material as the tendency for the airplane to "go over the top" when snapping over from a climbing turn was a very needed reminder and I intend to experiment with it aggressively next year with the appropriate equipment and circumstances. At Mr. Henriques suggestion I solicited an explaination from Rich Stowell: He is the evangelist for the P-A-R-E recovery acronymn. Power (to idle) Ailerons (to neutral) Rudder (against the spin) Elevator (briskly forward to break the stall). I must say he drafted a very thoughtful response to me in a direct email. The only conclusion I can offer to this essay is to point to his web site, and his book(s): http://www.richstowell.com/ He articulately explained that the inclinometer is not a precise indication of coordinated flight and that some form of yaw is a necessary ingredient to the spin. With this I'll sign off, thanks for the responses. Todd Deckard |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Dudley Henriques wrote in : Todd W. Deckard wrote: I have a limited exposure to spins (I've demonstrated spins or received spin instruction in 5 different airplanes on six different occasions). I have a commercial certificate (although you wouldn't think so from my demonstration of a chandelle). Maybe I did have to demonstrate a power on stall while in a climbing 20 degree bank, once. As I recall, we survived it. I return to the original question: if the ball is in the middle will it spin? Becuase I believe snowmobile suits are for snowmobiling and not for flying I won't have a chance to explore it with an aerobatic instructor and an appropriate (but drafty) airplane for a few months -- so I thought I would put the question in a bottle and throw it in the ocean. Regards Todd "Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message news:f2aea120-c3c7-497c-bf68- ... On Dec 27, 1:42 pm, "Todd W. Deckard" wrote: Can you depart and spin from coordinated flight? Specifically a coordinated climbing turn? And courting disaster doing a chandelle? If you're going to do a commercial ticket you should be familair with spins intimately. An incipient spin shouldn't even make you break a sweat. The answer to the ball question is no. It won't spin. A ball centered airplane in a climbing turn is compensated by rudder and is considered coordinated (in the classic sense). If you introduce a climbing turn stall with the ball centered, you might get a temporary wing drop at the break but unless you introduce a yaw rate as the stall breaks; no yaw rate...no spin! Hm, yeah. I'l have to explore this abit when I get a chance. I was fond of allowing the aiplane to snap over the top and allowing it to enter a spin in thei scenario to demonstrate to students how easy it was to enter a spin from a departure stall. Having said that, it always required unco-ordinated flight, no matter how slight. Lesson was to keep your eye on the airplane and not sit there FDH. Bertie This is normal and many instructors (including myself BTW) use the climbing turn power on stall as an intro to spin entry as a demonstration (after careful verbal preparation with the student). What screws everybody up when dealing with whether the airplane will spin out of this cfg are the variables that are taking place as the airspeed dissipates just before the stall break. I personally don't like relying on the ball as the prime reference for yaw cancellation when entering this regime just before the stall. Between the slipstream forces and engine torque, the ball can be used as a general indicator for correction but is seldom dead on as an indicator that all yaw has been canceled out. The rub is that ther's a chance of discrepency between a centered ball and a true canceling of all yaw from the vertical axis of the airplane. Like most aerobatic instructors, I like visual cues in these situations and teach them constantly even to primary students. The wingtip is a great visual cue as you approach stall. If you stabilize the low wingtip tip visually against the ground then watch the left tip carefully, when the yaw has been compensated for by the correct amount of opposing rudder, that low tip will remain stable. If more rudder is needed, the tip will appear to move back on you. Stabilize that low wingtip and the stall break will be center nose down with little wing drop and little tendency to spin (no yaw...no spin). It's yaw if present, coupled with the other variables present in an uncoordinated cfg as the stall breaks that can cause that severe wing drop. This coupled with SUSTAINED UNCORRECTED YAW is what will produce a pro spin scenario. What confuses people the most about the stall break explanation as relates to wing drop is that even with yaw compensated for, there is still an AOA difference between the wings and possible interference with the high wing at the stall break. This is what causes that over the top scenario so familiar to everyone. There is as well the possibility of a low wing breaking stall under certain conditions of control misuse as the stall is breaking, but over the top is usually what happens. -- Dudley Henriques |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Todd W. Deckard" wrote in
: I have a limited exposure to spins (I've demonstrated spins or received spin instruction in 5 different airplanes on six different occasions). I have a commercial certificate (although you wouldn't think so from my demonstration of a chandelle). Maybe I did have to demonstrate a power on stall while in a climbing 20 degree bank, once. As I recall, we survived it. I return to the original question: if the ball is in the middle will it spin? Well, I don't think it will IF it's perfectly co-ordinated, which, if you;re letting the airplane do it's own thing with only the same amount fo rudder you were carrying up to the stall, it probably won't be. Looking at the ball isn't going to get you very far at that stage anyway. You have to fly the airplane through it. I do agree that it's more satisfying to undertand the machanics of what's going on completely, but havng done departure stalls in a variety of airplanes, I've found them to behave in different ways in this situation. Mostly, though, if you just let the airplane do it's thing (i.e, become a passenger) it will roll over the top and enter a spin. Bertie |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Recently, Bertie the Bunyip posted:
BTW, stalls in a climbing turn are pretty much standard standard stuff even for Private pilots. Standard, and _required_ for the practical. I had to do both climbing and descending turning stalls for my checkride. Possibly because I chose to do my checkride in the middle of winter with an 18 kt. breeze and the examiner didn't want to die... ;-) Neil |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I reviewed the current copy of the Private Pilot PTS and it references
"maintain heading +/- 10 degrees in straight ahead flight, *or* not to exceed 20 degrees ... in turning flight" It would appear that the power on stalls may be demonstrated from straight ahead *or* climbing turns. They are not manditory, at least in the US at the private pilot level. Todd "Neil Gould" wrote in message ... Standard, and _required_ for the practical. I had to do both climbing and descending turning stalls for my checkride. Possibly because I chose to do my checkride in the middle of winter with an 18 kt. breeze and the examiner didn't want to die... ;-) Neil |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That is to say "stall reocover while turning and climbing is not mandatory"
"Todd W. Deckard" wrote in message ... They are not manditory, at least in the US at the private pilot level. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Recently, Todd W. Deckard posted:
That is to say "stall reocover while turning and climbing is not mandatory" Any item in the PTS is "required", and can be part of the test. Perhaps you should re-read item #5 under both power-on and power-off stalls so as not to be surprised during your check ride. Neil |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 27, 5:42*am, "Todd W. Deckard" wrote:
Can you depart and spin from coordinated flight? *Specifically a coordinated climbing turn? You have to have yawing motion. However, its very common for students to not be able to maintain coordination during a climbing stall to the right; which is why its a common way to introduce unexpected spins (I don't do that though). -Robert, CFII |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Todd W. Deckard wrote:
Can you depart and spin from coordinated flight? Specifically a coordinated climbing turn? During training and several BFR's I have done stalling turns with a CFI present. I have never spun. Your Mileage May Vary. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Coordinated turns without rudder, and autopilots | Mxsmanic | Piloting | 188 | June 1st 07 07:09 PM |
Coordinated turns and the little ball | Mxsmanic | Piloting | 51 | October 11th 06 10:17 PM |
Is rudder required for coordinated turns? | Mxsmanic | Piloting | 41 | September 24th 06 06:40 PM |
Snap / Flick and spins in flight simulators | [email protected] | Simulators | 1 | September 2nd 06 07:10 AM |
Coordinated turning stall and spins | Chris OCallaghan | Soaring | 20 | November 18th 03 08:46 PM |