![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 13 Feb, 17:54, "Tim Mara" wrote:
Thousands have been sold....I know Replogel alone sold "to date" 3010 ...not many of these flying off the shelves today but I bet 90% of the ones sold are still out there sitting on someone's shelves I just checked ... OK number 571 is on a shelf three feet from where I'm sitting. Ian |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 13, 12:30*pm, Ian wrote:
On 13 Feb, 17:54, "Tim Mara" wrote: Thousands have been sold....I know Replogel alone sold "to date" 3010 ....not many of these flying off the shelves today but I bet 90% of the ones sold are still out there sitting on someone's shelves I just checked ... OK number 571 is on a shelf three feet from where I'm sitting. Ian .... and my smoke on foil clockwork wonder is resting in its shipping box at home. Perhaps I'll send it off for calibration for 'one more year' of use! I believe the original subject was about cost of CFRs. Yes, they're too high, but so are transceiver, transponders, etc. In my personal experience over the last seven years (that's all the time I've been flying) my fellow club members and I have purhased 4 bits of glider electronics. Three radios and one transponder. Of these four high priced items, 100% had issues that required manufacturer repair. IMO $1,500 for a 5 watt transceiver is a lot of money for such incredibly bad Qaulity Control. If these were consumer electronics, the manufacturers would both be out of business. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 13, 4:47*pm, wrote:
On Feb 13, 12:30*pm, Ian wrote: On 13 Feb, 17:54, "Tim Mara" wrote: Thousands have been sold....I know Replogel alone sold "to date" 3010 ....not many of these flying off the shelves today but I bet 90% of the ones sold are still out there sitting on someone's shelves I just checked ... OK number 571 is on a shelf three feet from where I'm sitting. Ian .... and my *smoke on foil clockwork wonder is resting in its shipping box at home. *Perhaps I'll send it off for calibration for 'one more year' of use! * I believe the original subject was about cost of CFRs. *Yes, they're too high, but so are transceiver, transponders, etc. *In my personal experience over the last seven years (that's all the time I've been flying) my fellow club members and I have purhased 4 bits of glider electronics. *Three radios and one transponder. *Of these four high priced items, 100% had issues that required manufacturer repair. *IMO $1,500 for a 5 watt transceiver is a lot of money for such incredibly bad Qaulity Control. *If these were consumer electronics, the manufacturers would both be out of business. I've dropped my Garmin 76 out of the cockpit onto the runway. It slid off the dashboard numerous times while I was using it for retrieve duty. My son got hold of it when I left it on the dining room table and used it as a walkie-talkie while playing space explorer with his friends. Still tickin'. There's a lot to be learned from high- volume manufacturing in electronics. One of the problems we've created with the reliance on what amounts to a cottage industry (ie. glider instrument manufacturing) is the fact that you are pretty much ****-outta-luck if your high-priced gizmo craps out on you the day before a big event. If I accidentally run over my Garmin, I can go to any Walmart (or EU equivalent) and pick one up for a hundred and fifty bucks. If my FunkenFlugen 12000G craps out, I'm out of business for minimum 3 weeks while it wends its way over the Pond to Slovenia and back (not to mention being out more than the cost of the Garmin for shipping alone). Okay, the above is a bit tongue-in-cheek. We need both COTs and IGC- Secure loggers for different reasons. They just need to peacefully coexist |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ian wrote:
On 13 Feb, 15:00, Tony Verhulst wrote: Ian wrote: flight verification (I believe we're losing ground observers as well). You understand of course that whatever they may say, they're really doing it for convenience - *their* convenience. Of course. One answer, of course, is for another authority besides the FAI to issue badges. Like that will ever happen. Nothing to stop it. And while it's about it, the new badges could be handicap linked. Silver in 50:1 is just taking the mickey. Ian You could pretty much do this using the OLC, which already allows you to submit flight tracings using COTS GPS hardware like the Etrex, or from a free PDA based GPS program like "Soaring Pilot". Admittedly, they give you a "blue V" instead of a "green V" like with the IGC approved recorders, but who cares? Somebody could set up a program to award badges to people who want them using those tracings. No IGC would be needed, and they would also already be handicapped by the OLC. The Etrex, being self contained, would be very portable from one club sailplane to another. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
OLC Loggers | RN | Soaring | 8 | November 17th 07 12:11 AM |
A Preliminary Assessment of the Potential Cost and Cost-Effectiveness of Space-Based Weapons. | Mike[_7_] | Naval Aviation | 0 | November 2nd 07 03:18 PM |
Pressure Altitude in Loggers | ContestID67 | Soaring | 2 | June 12th 07 02:41 AM |
IGC loggers again | tango4 | Soaring | 3 | July 14th 04 05:50 PM |
Vanity Loggers? | Steve | Soaring | 0 | October 5th 03 03:54 AM |