Apology re mxsmanic

Dudley Henriques writes:

Trust me, the Naval Test Pilot School knows all it needs to know and so
do I.

You've already said that "they'll need this revelation." Now you are saying
the opposite. Which statement is true?

"terry" wrote in message
...
On Feb 14, 3:34 am, Bertie the Bunyip
wrote:
On 13 Feb, 15:07, Mxsmanic wrote:

terry writes:
Are you implying Le Chaud and Mxs are the same person? I find that
very hard to believe. Totally different attitude.

Many people simplify their perception of others by categorizing everyone
as
"one of us" or "one of them."

What, like you do with your "tree house club"

I couldn't care less if the guy has a licence or not. Just ask the FO
I just had.

Whaaaaaat? you had an FO without a license? Geez, I got pulled up
in the run up area by a CFI and asked to shut down immediately and
vacate the aircraft - cos I didnt have my piece of paper physically on
me. He knew I had a license but the rules say you have to have it with
you in the aircraft, and of course you are less likely to crash if
you have it wtih you .


That CFI sounds like a fun easy going guy.

Mxsmanic wrote:
Dudley Henriques writes:

Trust me, the Naval Test Pilot School knows all it needs to know and so
do I.

You've already said that "they'll need this revelation." Now you are saying
the opposite. Which statement is true?

Get a dictionary and look up the word "satire".


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

On Feb 14, 2:07*am, Mxsmanic wrote:
terry writes:
Are you implying Le Chaud and Mxs are the same person? *I find that
very hard to believe. *Totally different attitude.

Many people simplify their perception of others by categorizing everyone as
"one of us" or "one of them." *Since they may have trouble understanding
viewpoints other than their own, very often they confuse the identities of
those with whom they disagree (in the latter group) and assimilate them all
into a single sort of metaperson or bogeyman. *It may also console them to
think that only one person is behind all the personalities with whom they
disagree, since the alternative would be to acknowledge that there are more
such people than they might like to believe.

So you are a psychologist too? is there a rec.psychology group? I am
sure they would love to hear from you.
You need to learn the difference between viewpoints and facts. You
can have different viewpoints on whether god exists, you cant have
different view points on what 1+1 equals, well I suspose you could but
you are going to annoy a hell of a lot of people and make yourself
look pretty silly in the process.
Terry

wrote in message
...
Mxsmanic wrote:
Dudley Henriques writes:

Trust me, the Naval Test Pilot School knows all it needs to know and so
do I.

You've already said that "they'll need this revelation." Now you are
saying
the opposite. Which statement is true?

Get a dictionary and look up the word "satire".


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

Then MX needs to pick up a thesaurus and look up douche bag.

Mxsmanic wrote:
Dudley Henriques writes:

Trust me, the Naval Test Pilot School knows all it needs to know and so
do I.

You've already said that "they'll need this revelation." Now you are saying
the opposite. Which statement is true?

You're kidding ? No one could be this uninformed on the subtleties of
Usenet sarcasm :-))
And here I've always thought you were familiar with the "dark side".
:-))

--
Dudley Henriques

Mxsmanic wrote:
Dudley Henriques writes:

Trust me, the Naval Test Pilot School knows all it needs to know and so
do I.

You've already said that "they'll need this revelation." Now you are saying
the opposite. Which statement is true?

This short post from Mx should prove that he really is a troll and not
just some maladjusted, asocial innocent dube interested in aviation, as
some here seem to think.

writes:

Get a dictionary and look up the word "satire".

I see no sign of satire here.

terry writes:

So you are a psychologist too?

One need not be a psychologist to see the obvious.

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

writes:

Get a dictionary and look up the word "satire".

I see no sign of satire here.

Proof of inferior intelligence.