![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 4, 7:55 am, C J Campbell
wrote: They do die in real airplanes, though, and the FAA has held that a pilot who reads back an erroneous clearance is still required to fly the one given him by ATC, even if ATC doesn't correct him. The FAA hasn't held that at all. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2008-04-04 08:53:46 -0700, "Steven P. McNicoll"
said: On Apr 4, 7:55 am, C J Campbell wrote: They do die in real airplanes, though, and the FAA has held that a pilot who reads back an erroneous clearance is still required to fly the one given him by ATC, even if ATC doesn't correct him. The FAA hasn't held that at all. Sorry. You are right. It was the NTSB in the Merrell case, 1999. -- Waddling Eagle World Famous Flight Instructor |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
C J Campbell writes:
They do die in real airplanes, though, and the FAA has held that a pilot who reads back an erroneous clearance is still required to fly the one given him by ATC, even if ATC doesn't correct him. But that is a physical impossibility. If the pilot heard 110 instead of 210 because of static, and he reads back and flies 110, and ATC doesn't correct him, how is the pilot to magically know what ATC really said and magically fly that? Where did the FAA hold this? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 04 Apr 2008 19:14:23 +0200, Mxsmanic
wrote: If the pilot heard 110 instead of 210 because of static, and he reads back and flies 110, and ATC doesn't correct him, how is the pilot to magically know what ATC really said and magically fly that? Ask, "Say again." |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
news ![]() C J Campbell writes: They do die in real airplanes, though, and the FAA has held that a pilot who reads back an erroneous clearance is still required to fly the one given him by ATC, even if ATC doesn't correct him. But that is a physical impossibility. If the pilot heard 110 instead of 210 because of static, and he reads back and flies 110, and ATC doesn't correct him, how is the pilot to magically know what ATC really said and magically fly that? That's because you'r enot a pilot, you're an idiot. When advice is needed on how to make a good burger out of dumpster scraps, we'll call you. Bertie |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: RubberWatch writes: I am a student pilot. I was out flying solo today and was instructed by ATC to fly a heading of 210. I thought he said 110 and I flew on that heading. Did you read back the heading? If you read back 110 and he said nothing, you're okay, since he should have corrected you. If you read back 210 and then flew 110, that's potentially a problem (although probably not in this case, since you fixed it). If you didn't read back the heading, that also can potentially be a problem because the burden is upon you to fly the correct heading if you didn't read it back. If you had ever flown a real airplane Anthony, you would know what a moron you are. Ooops, I forgot, you've never flown a real airplane. All you do is set the autopilot in your simulator and stroke your joystick while watching the monitor. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
excellent.. more advice from a simulator operator..
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... RubberWatch writes: I am a student pilot. I was out flying solo today and was instructed by ATC to fly a heading of 210. I thought he said 110 and I flew on that heading. Did you read back the heading? If you read back 110 and he said nothing, you're okay, since he should have corrected you. If you read back 210 and then flew 110, that's potentially a problem (although probably not in this case, since you fixed it). If you didn't read back the heading, that also can potentially be a problem because the burden is upon you to fly the correct heading if you didn't read it back. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BT wrote:
excellent.. more advice from a simulator operator.. "Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... He's still here? -- Mortimer Schnerd, RN mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BT writes:
excellent.. more advice from a simulator operator.. Which part do you disagree with? Do you think VFR pilots should not read back instructions from ATC? Do you think VFR pilots should fly what ATC wants instead of what they heard in ATC's instructions? If so, how are they to know what ATC really wants if they misheard the instructions and they don't read them back, or if they read them back and ATC fails to correct them? How do you do that? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: BT writes: excellent.. more advice from a simulator operator.. Which part do you disagree with? Do you think VFR pilots should not read back instructions from ATC? Do you think VFR pilots should fly what ATC wants instead of what they heard in ATC's instructions? If so, how are they to know what ATC really wants if they misheard the instructions and they don't read them back, or if they read them back and ATC fails to correct them? How do you do that? Wow, you really don't know **** about flying. What a moron you are. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Confused re transponders and ADS-B | Andrew Gideon | Piloting | 6 | June 27th 06 01:49 AM |
Another ADIZ violation? | Dan Foster | Piloting | 5 | January 4th 06 02:25 AM |
Confused about great circle navigation | xerj | Piloting | 7 | July 10th 04 05:38 PM |
No wonder I'm confused:) | John0714 | Soaring | 0 | May 1st 04 07:02 PM |