Ping Nesbitt

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in news:AeOdnWo-5YmRxozdRVn-
:


"Jim Knoyle" wrote in message
...

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Jim Knoyle" wrote in message
...

"Tarver Engineering" wrote:


"Gord Beaman" wrote in message
.. .
"Jim Knoyle" wrote:

Hang on here a second now Jim, you still need two samples. As Dan
says you need 'static pressure' to read the altitude from and you
need 'pitot pressure' (ram air pressure) as well as the static
pressure to derive the airspeed reading from. Sounds like you're
saying that you can read 'both' from just the 'ram air pressure'
alone. Or did I misunderstand you?

Jim has finally figued out what a pitot tube is, but somehow he still
wants
to be correct in his archive troll. It is a great paradox.


I know...ain't life a bitch John

--

-Gord.


Splaps, you can go on quoting Gord's comment
'till the cows come home but your ommision of
my response to Gord is just more evidence of
your dishonesty.

There is no response possible, Knoyle.


Well, duh.

bertie

"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "Tarver Engineering"

"John R Weiss" wrote in message
news:HdIQb.117057$nt4.481633@attbi_s51...
"B2431" wrote...

The question I have has he ever really been correct about anything
aviation?

Dan, do you remember when you were lying about averaging thermocouples by
shorting them together? You would do well to stick to humor.


Tarver, I never said that. Making things up is not a good way to make
yourself
look good.

It made you look foolish, Dan and then Gord made himself look foolish trying
to help you.

"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: Yeff


On 25 Jan 2004 04:58:49 GMT, B2431 wrote:

The question I have has he ever really been correct about anything
aviation?

The question I have is why anybody continues to engage the idiot?

Well I am housebound most of the time and they don't allow real fights on
Springer anymore so I have to substitute. g

Yeff can't even offer your level of incompenance to the group, so I wonder
why he is even posting.

"Jim Knoyle" wrote in message

Square that with your statement: ( direct quote )
"No pitot tube silly bunny.
It would be profoundly stupid to put a home for mud wasps on an airplane
flying as much as a 727."

The 727 has a pitot port and a static port, idiot Knoyle. You might want to
note that your ignorance of trying to add pitot and static pressures from a
pitot tube demonstrates that you are also incompetent WRT pitot static
systems in general.

You remember, a pitot port is that thing you were mis-describing when Gord
wrote this:

"Tarver Engineering" wrote:


"Gord Beaman" wrote in message
.. .
"Jim Knoyle" wrote:

Hang on here a second now Jim, you still need two samples. As Dan
says you need 'static pressure' to read the altitude from and you
need 'pitot pressure' (ram air pressure) as well as the static
pressure to derive the airspeed reading from. Sounds like you're
saying that you can read 'both' from just the 'ram air pressure'
alone. Or did I misunderstand you?

Jim has finally figued out what a pitot tube is, but somehow he still wants
to be correct in his archive troll. It is a great paradox.


I know...ain't life a bitch John

--

-Gord.

Ralph Nesbitt wrote:
"Tom Mosher" wrote in message
news
Bertie the Bunyip wrote:

(Tom Mosher) wrote in
.com:



Bertie the Bunyip wrote in message
clonews.com...


(running with scissors)
wrote in om:



Bertie the Bunyip wrote in message
news:430068f0208daf0ea234ffd435483bfe@news. cyclonews.com...


"Tarver Engineering" wrote in
:



"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
4.113.17...


"Tarver Engineering" wrote in
news:0JydnYJ4TPELaJPdRVn- :



Whom does Knoyle sell his "negative knowledge" services to?


you, apparently.

Knoyle's employment is a "safety of flight" issue, bunyip.

And your alleged employment is a danger in flight issue.

****.

Bertie


and on the ground also.

Not to mention zoologically.

Bertie


What's with Tarver? He's constantly saying that someone should be run
out of the industry or that he'll use his connections to get someone
fired or in trouble with the law.


Simply put, he's an idiot.



Once, I believe, he threatened my employment by saying that he'd rat
me out to Pratt & Whitney who he thought at the time was my employer.


snort! Imagine how that phone call would go..


"Good morning, Pratt and Whitney, how may I help you?"
"Uh, I wanna rat out a bad engineer. A real bad engineer."
"I see I'll connect you to our rat department"
"Oh, is this an 900 number? "
"Excuse me sir?"
(sounds of heavy breathing)
"Uh I want to talk to the guy in charge unless he's a butt licking
Klinonista"
"Yes sir, I'll connect you to our butt licking section"
(more heavy breathing)
"Hello, this is standards, may I help you?"
"Uh, yeah, I want to snithc on one of your people.He pretends to be an
engineer but has no idea what a temerature totalizer is."
"a temerature totalizer? Can you explain sir? I don't know what that is
either."
You know it totals up the temperatures in the cans"
"In the cans? Like beer cans?"
"Yes, beer.Malt liquor, Tarver tea, yellow gold.
wait! no, i mean it totals up the temperature in the engine"
"Really? That sounds like it might be useful if we ever get to the point
where we just have a big red light saying "temperature" on the

dashboard."

"You do have one of those, it's in the EPHIS display, moron!
"Excuse me Mr Tarver, but I'm not going to stand here and be called a

moron

by someone I don't even know!"
"Then you're a negaive genius, moron!


and so on..

Bertie

Temperature totalizer? Did he actually use that phrase?

I've been working in one state and living in another so I don't get to
peruse the newsgroups very often these days.

Tom Mosher


Phil Miller started a "Thread" on the system that measures Intake Air Temp
on T-56 engines used on Hercules A/C based on the manual. Tarver argued the
manual was wrong & the system worked in a different way. Jim Knowle joined
the discussion. Several have posted Tarver was an "Idiot" or similar
inference re his posts in the thread.

The Discussion over Intake Air Temp Systems, combined with Pitot Tubes is
what has got "Tarver/Splaps Boy/Splappy" on the "War Path" after Jim Knowle.

Perhaps Phil can/will give you the exact "Thread Listing". It is good a
enough laugh to make it worth a trip to "Goggle".
Ralph Nesbitt
Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type


I tried at one time to follow the thread but gave up in frustration as
it twisted and turned.

Time to go back to Texas. It ought to be interesting to see how this
thread morphs during the week when I have no access to the newsgroups.

Tom Mosher
SLA

On 25 Jan 2004 04:58:49 GMT, (B2431) wrote:

Subject: Ping Nesbitt
From: Tom Mosher

Bertie
Temperature totalizer? Did he actually use that phrase?

I've been working in one state and living in another so I don't get to
peruse the newsgroups very often these days.

Yes he did and once again he is right and every single person who disagrees
with him is a moron despite the fact no one on Earth agrees with him and he
refuses to provide a citation that does. Let's face it, the poor boy is legend
in his own mind.

The question I have has he ever really been correct about anything aviation?

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

ISTR a post of his about 2-3 years ago in which all of the words were spelled
correctly. Of course, that was an anomaly. :-)

Al Minyard

RN wrote:
Tarver argued the manual was wrong [...]


With that attitude, I hope he never tries to put up any furniture from Ikea

Cheers

Blippie
--
Visit the alt.aviation.safety FAQ online at www.blippie.org.uk

"Alan Minyard" wrote in message
...

ISTR a post of his about 2-3 years ago in which all of the words were
spelled
correctly. Of course, that was an anomaly. :-)

Beyond spelling, ram is pretty much all beyond Minyard's understanding.

I like my okie phonics, it is a maximum lazy way to write.

"Blippie" wrote in message
...
RN wrote:
Tarver argued the manual was wrong [...]


With that attitude, I hope he never tries to put up any furniture from
Ikea

MMs are usually wrong, but it doesn't generally make any difference. It
doesn't really hurt anything for the MM to call a "total" an "average".
Except perhaps the tiny mind of Miller and those adhearing to his sub-idiot
detection system.

I remember last Summer when we were building out the ADCU-500 for Boeing's
747 ammended type certificate and BCAG Long Beach told us that one of the
signals from the King ADC ran backwards from the way we had implemented it,
but by the end of the same day Everett had verified that the MM Long Beach
was reading was incorrect.

From: "Tarver Engineering"


"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "Tarver Engineering"

"John R Weiss" wrote in message
news:HdIQb.117057$nt4.481633@attbi_s51...
"B2431" wrote...

The question I have has he ever really been correct about anything
aviation?

Dan, do you remember when you were lying about averaging thermocouples by
shorting them together? You would do well to stick to humor.


Tarver, I never said that. Making things up is not a good way to make
yourself
look good.

It made you look foolish, Dan and then Gord made himself look foolish trying
to help you.

Well, seeing as you refuse to say where I said anything about shorted
thermocouples I have to remind you that YOU were the only one who mentioned
shorted thermocouples when you said that is the way they usually fail.

You failed to quote the part where I asked you for proof I ever said anything
about shorted thermocouples.

Selected omissions and outright lies are so typical of you. This is the reason
everyone in this newsgroup considers you a fraud. It makes me wonder why I
bother treating you with respect.

Dan, U.S.Air Force, retired