Fine example of Tarver Engineering release for service

"Gord Beaman" wrote in message
...

Can you just imagine how long the tech course must be?...

A pitot tube is a fairly delicate instrument. There were artilce 15s for
those attepting to clean a pitot tube on our F-106 flightline. The pilots
did not apreciate having their displayed airspeed wrong.

"Matthew S. Whiting" wrote in message
...

No, you have trouble writing things that make sense. What is unreliable
about a pitot tube? The heater is likely the least reliable part.
Which airplane(s) have pitot ports? I don't think I've seen one. What
makes them more reliable?

I have no interest in educating you, Whiting.

From: "Scott M. Kozel"
t

JL Grasso wrote:

"Scott M. Kozel" wrote:
JL Grasso wrote:
"Tarver Engineering" wrote:

The whole point of using a static port is to be able to take the guts
out of
a pitot tube and produce only pitot pressure, thus increasing the
reliability of the system.

Bwaaaaahwahwahwahwahwahwahwahwah3wahw!

Keyboard!

Thank tarver!

I've spewed soda on at least a dozen keyboards, from reading Splappy's posts.

Now you know why I never drink or eat while reading tarver, grantland, pechukov
(sp?) or marron. When I see the header with any of these names I put my drink
down so I won't choke to death while reading the latest
lie...oops...pronouncement from on high.

Keyboards are inexpensive, but hard to find at 3 am.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

From: "Matthew S. Whiting"
Date: 2/28/2004 11:56 AM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

Tarver Engineering wrote:
"Matthew S. Whiting" wrote in message
...

JL Grasso wrote:

On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 19:25:26 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"



wrote:



The whole point of using a static port is to be able to take the guts

out of

a pitot tube and produce only pitot pressure, thus increasing the
reliability of the system.


Bwaaaaahwahwahwahwahwahwahwahwah3wahw!


Yes, those static ports are pretty unreliable! :-)


Pitot tubes are unreliable in comparason to a static port/pitot port
combination.

Do you have trouble reading, Whiting?



No, you have trouble writing things that make sense. What is unreliable
about a pitot tube? The heater is likely the least reliable part.
Which airplane(s) have pitot ports? I don't think I've seen one. What
makes them more reliable?


Matt


Matt, all aircraft have pitot ports. Look on the back of an IAS indicator. You
will see one pitot port and one static port. As for pitot ports external to the
aircraft tarver has never, never will and can never provide proof. Use whatever
search engines you will and you can verify this for yourself.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

From: "Tarver Engineering"
Date: 2/28/2004 12:01 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:


"Gord Beaman" wrote in message
.. .

Can you just imagine how long the tech course must be?...

A pitot tube is a fairly delicate instrument. There were artilce 15s for
those attepting to clean a pitot tube on our F-106 flightline. The pilots
did not apreciate having their displayed airspeed wrong.

Tarver, that is an out and out lie.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Do you have trouble reading, Whiting?



No, you have trouble writing things that make sense.

You're being charitable.

Tarver Engineering wrote:
"Matthew S. Whiting" wrote in message
...


No, you have trouble writing things that make sense. What is unreliable
about a pitot tube? The heater is likely the least reliable part.
Which airplane(s) have pitot ports? I don't think I've seen one. What
makes them more reliable?


I have no interest in educating you, Whiting.



I suspect my education is already well beyond yours, Tarver.

wrote:


Do you have trouble reading, Whiting?



No, you have trouble writing things that make sense.


You're being charitable.



Yes, I'm just a nice guy. :-)

Matt

"Matthew S. Whiting" wrote in message
...

Yes, I'm just a nice guy. :-)

You do have that going for you so far.

Your ignorance of pitot static systems is typical, however.

Tarver Engineering wrote:
"Matthew S. Whiting" wrote in message
...


Yes, I'm just a nice guy. :-)


You do have that going for you so far.

Your ignorance of pitot static systems is typical, however.

Yes, it seems to match yours, so I guess two of us makes it qualify as
typical. :-)

Matt