A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

How Boeing steered tanker bid



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 14th 04, 08:05 PM
Alan Minyard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 13 Apr 2004 22:26:24 -0700, (sid) wrote:

Alan Minyard wrote in message . ..

http://www.kansas.com/mld/eagle/busi...on/8317604.htm
Pentagon's audit agrees: Air Force fudged specs
The audit report finds that the Air Force tailored its bidding
specifications document to the Boeing 767, and the Air Force and
Boeing failed to meet important requirements that would make the
aircraft fit for war, the officials told Knight Ridder, speaking on
condition of anonymity.

-HJC


"On condition of anonymity" is news speak for "delusional idiot". Utterly
useless as a source of facts.

Al Minyard


This, direct from the report:
• Statutory Provisions for Testing. Comply with Sections 2366 and 2399
of title 10, United States Code for determining the operational
effectiveness, suitability, and survivability of the Boeing 767A
Tanker aircraft before proceeding beyond low-rate initial production
and committing to the subsequent production of all 100 Boeing KC-767A
Tanker aircraft. By not complying with the statutory provisions, the
Boeing KC-767A Tanker aircraft delivered to the warfighter may not be
operationally effective, suitable, and survivable (Issue B-4


No, from the *supposed* report.

Al Minyard
  #2  
Old April 14th 04, 08:27 PM
Dweezil Dwarftosser
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

sid wrote:

Alan Minyard wrote in message . ..

http://www.kansas.com/mld/eagle/busi...on/8317604.htm
Pentagon's audit agrees: Air Force fudged specs
The audit report finds that the Air Force tailored its bidding
specifications document to the Boeing 767, and the Air Force and
Boeing failed to meet important requirements that would make the
aircraft fit for war, the officials told Knight Ridder, speaking on
condition of anonymity.

-HJC


"On condition of anonymity" is news speak for "delusional idiot". Utterly
useless as a source of facts.

Al Minyard


This, direct from the report:
• Statutory Provisions for Testing. Comply with Sections 2366 and 2399
of title 10, United States Code for determining the operational
effectiveness, suitability, and survivability of the Boeing 767A
Tanker aircraft before proceeding beyond low-rate initial production
and committing to the subsequent production of all 100 Boeing KC-767A
Tanker aircraft. By not complying with the statutory provisions, the
Boeing KC-767A Tanker aircraft delivered to the warfighter may not be
operationally effective, suitable, and survivable (Issue B-4


Sounds like the same reason we didn't buy KC-747s.
(Iran did, though...)
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Boeing Boondoggle Larry Dighera Military Aviation 77 September 15th 04 02:39 AM
Boeing B-767 Tanker case "Virtual Kryptonite" BJ Military Aviation 1 December 20th 03 05:15 AM
Boeing fires top officials over tanker lease scam. Henry J. Cobb Military Aviation 2 November 25th 03 06:15 AM
AOPA and ATC Privatization Chip Jones Instrument Flight Rules 139 November 12th 03 08:26 PM
Boeing Set For Huge Profits From Tanker Deal ZZBunker Military Aviation 2 July 4th 03 03:18 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.