Experimentals To Be Banned To Rural Airports?

there are no readily available statistics to answer that question.
we are working up the statistics on percentage of experimental aircraft vs
other aircraft based at the airport, and also the percentage of training, vs
local vs transient.

Many accidents in the past have involved transient pilots not familiar with
high density altitude operations or desert wind conditions.
BT

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
BT writes:

NTSB statistics prove that of the 37 accidents at this airport since the
county took over in 1982, only 3 were experimental aircraft.

What percentage of all aircraft movements were experimental aircraft
during
the same period?

No..
A much respected and experienced pilot from the Palo Alto CA area



"T. "Tim" Timothy Haag aka HyoogeUmp56" wrote in
g...



http://www.avweb.com/eletter/archives/avflash/1199-full.html#198676-
Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

What about the pilot? Did he survive?

"Mike" wrote in message
news:rLXtk.24$393.9@trnddc05...

I don't play that game. I feel no obligation to be your personal research
service on a subject that has been widely reported. But if you explain
how you're too inept to use google, I'll be glad to talk about it. Cell
phones + driving + risks yields 264,000 results including numerous studies
published in peer reviewed publications on the subject.


That's your opinion, unsupported by facts. As I said, you've already
proven my point beautifully. All you want to do now is go off topic.

"Mike" wrote in message
news:rLXtk.24$393.9@trnddc05...

Your bluffs been called, show your cards or fold your hand.

I don't play that game. I feel no obligation to be your personal research
service on a subject that has been widely reported. But if you explain
how you're too inept to use google, I'll be glad to talk about it. Cell
phones + driving + risks yields 264,000 results including numerous studies
published in peer reviewed publications on the subject.


That's your opinion, unsupported by facts. As I said, you've already
proven my point beautifully. All you want to do now is go off topic.

That's what I thought Mikey Mouth, you're talking out your ass.

Sounds just like some of Anthony's bull****. Did you take lessons from him?

jeremy wrote in
:

John wrote:

PS. We have laws about proper vehicle operation already, we don't
need new laws that call out specific activiries. Enforce what we
have already

Do not ever think of driving in Europe.

let's qualify that. We're talking Germany and Gemrany wannabes here.


In most countries you will be stopped if spotted eating, drinking,
talking on the phone, or doing anything that is not driving. On the
autobahn at speed, you may be cautioned for not having both hands on
the steering wheel. You can fail your driving test by talking, failing
to check your mirrors once a minute or resting your elbows on the
door. You will get tickets for failing to signal a lane change,
cruising in the fast lane, overtaking on the inside, running out of
washer fluid, not having a spare tyre, car body damage, misaligned
headlights, and not having your lights on if your wipers are running.


Snort! Ever drive in Italy? They don't believe in seatbelts. It means
you haven't got confidence in your driving and makes you more likely to
have an accident.
A quick peek at the cars going by there will reveal a huge percentage of
people not bothering with them. The further south you go the fewer wear
them. (Padanians, are, after all, wannabe germans) You can nearly tell
your lattitude by the percentage of non wearers. Same is roughtly true
for france and spain.


And then, OTOH, you can drive as fast as you like just about anywhere
but England.



Bertie

"Ramsey" @##@.^net wrote in :


"Mike" wrote in message
news:rLXtk.24$393.9@trnddc05...

I don't play that game. I feel no obligation to be your personal
research service on a subject that has been widely reported. But if
you explain how you're too inept to use google, I'll be glad to talk
about it. Cell phones + driving + risks yields 264,000 results
including numerous studies published in peer reviewed publications on
the subject.


That's your opinion, unsupported by facts. As I said, you've already
proven my point beautifully. All you want to do now is go off topic.

"Mike" wrote in message
news:rLXtk.24$393.9@trnddc05...

Your bluffs been called, show your cards or fold your hand.

I don't play that game. I feel no obligation to be your personal
research service on a subject that has been widely reported. But if
you explain how you're too inept to use google, I'll be glad to talk
about it. Cell phones + driving + risks yields 264,000 results
including numerous studies published in peer reviewed publications on
the subject.


That's your opinion, unsupported by facts. As I said, you've already
proven my point beautifully. All you want to do now is go off topic.

That's what I thought Mikey Mouth, you're talking out your ass.


Stil haven;t got to grips with that whole Google thing, have you?



Sounds just like some of Anthony's bull****. Did you take lessons from
him?


Teach maxie to fish and he comes home with an old boot and a shopping
cart....



Bertie

In article ,
Bertie the Bunyip wrote:

"Mike" wrote in news:qJXtk.23$393.21@trnddc05:

"Ramsey" @##@.^net wrote in message
...

"Mike" wrote in message
news:s9Stk.1198$Ro1.612@trnddc04...
"Ramsey" @##@.^net wrote in message
news
"Mike" wrote in message
news:tNRtk.1134$w51.346@trnddc01...
"Bob Noel" wrote in message
...
In article Y4Htk.1161$Ro1.744@trnddc04, "Mike"
wrote:

Nobody wants to give up their "right" to
drive with a cell phone, ignore speed limits, run stop lights,
etc. even
though such activity puts other people at risk.

"drive with a cell phone" .... ohmygawd. Hey, what about drive
with one of those GPS thingies, or changing CDs or scanning thru
XM radio or....?
Maybe we should require a sterile car so that nothing, absolutely
nothing
can distract the driver.

(yep - this crusade about talking on a cellphone is a hot button
for me).

Crusade all you want. Argue from silly extremes all you want.
Talking on the phone while driving increases risk of having a
serious accident by 4-5 times. But you prove my point
beautifully. People don't really give a rat's arse about being
safer if it inconvieniences them, even if the inconvienience is
slight.

Got any data to support that?

Yes.

Your google broke?

Do your own homework piggy. Put up, shut, or you my bitch.

No problem.

www.google.com

Chinese Proverb: Give a man a fish, feed him for a day. Teach a man
to fish and you feed him for a lifetime.




Thing is, Maxie thinks that fishing is best done by poisoning the pond.
Plenty of fish for about a day and a half....but of course those aren't
any good either..

Bertie

I thought he used dynamite!

--
Remove _'s from email address to talk to me.

Orval Fairbairn wrote in
news
In article ,
Bertie the Bunyip wrote:

"Mike" wrote in news:qJXtk.23$393.21@trnddc05:

"Ramsey" @##@.^net wrote in message
...

"Mike" wrote in message
news:s9Stk.1198$Ro1.612@trnddc04...
"Ramsey" @##@.^net wrote in message
news
"Mike" wrote in message
news:tNRtk.1134$w51.346@trnddc01...
"Bob Noel" wrote in
message
news:ihatessppaamm-283B1F.20455328082008
@news.isp.giganews.com...
In article Y4Htk.1161$Ro1.744@trnddc04, "Mike"
wrote:

Nobody wants to give up their "right" to
drive with a cell phone, ignore speed limits, run stop
lights,
etc. even
though such activity puts other people at risk.

"drive with a cell phone" .... ohmygawd. Hey, what about
drive
with one of those GPS thingies, or changing CDs or scanning
thru
XM radio or....?
Maybe we should require a sterile car so that nothing,
absolutely
nothing
can distract the driver.

(yep - this crusade about talking on a cellphone is a hot
button
for me).

Crusade all you want. Argue from silly extremes all you want.
Talking on the phone while driving increases risk of having a
serious accident by 4-5 times. But you prove my point
beautifully. People don't really give a rat's arse about being
safer if it inconvieniences them, even if the inconvienience is
slight.

Got any data to support that?

Yes.

Your google broke?

Do your own homework piggy. Put up, shut, or you my bitch.

No problem.

www.google.com

Chinese Proverb: Give a man a fish, feed him for a day. Teach a
man
to fish and you feed him for a lifetime.




Thing is, Maxie thinks that fishing is best done by poisoning the
pond.
Plenty of fish for about a day and a half....but of course those
aren't
any good either..

Bertie

I thought he used dynamite!


I didn't want to swell his head by giving him too much credit.
Also, by using poison, he ensures the pond is uninhabitable!


Bertie

"Mike" wrote in message
news:rLXtk.24$393.9@trnddc05...

I don't play that game. I feel no obligation to be your personal research
service on a subject that has been widely reported. But if you explain
how you're too inept to use google, I'll be glad to talk about it. Cell
phones + driving + risks yields 264,000 results including numerous studies
published in peer reviewed publications on the subject.


That's your opinion, unsupported by facts. As I said, you've already
proven my point beautifully. All you want to do now is go off topic.

Then you should have no problem providing links to a half dozen of these
reports.

Then put up or shut up Mikey Mouth. You're all talk.

"Ramsey" @##@.^net wrote in message ...

"Mike" wrote in message
news:rLXtk.24$393.9@trnddc05...

I don't play that game. I feel no obligation to be your personal
research service on a subject that has been widely reported. But if you
explain how you're too inept to use google, I'll be glad to talk about
it. Cell phones + driving + risks yields 264,000 results including
numerous studies published in peer reviewed publications on the subject.


That's your opinion, unsupported by facts. As I said, you've already
proven my point beautifully. All you want to do now is go off topic.

Then you should have no problem providing links to a half dozen of these
reports.

I don't. You obviously do.

Then put up or shut up Mikey Mouth. You're all talk.

Pot/Kettle.

"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
...


Snort! Ever drive in Italy? They don't believe in seatbelts. It means
you haven't got confidence in your driving and makes you more likely to
have an accident.
A quick peek at the cars going by there will reveal a huge percentage of
people not bothering with them. The further south you go the fewer wear
them. (Padanians, are, after all, wannabe germans) You can nearly tell
your lattitude by the percentage of non wearers. Same is roughtly true
for france and spain.


And then, OTOH, you can drive as fast as you like just about anywhere
but England.



Bertie


Like you have ever been there looserboi.