A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Cell phone regulation on airlines?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old October 13th 04, 02:06 AM
Pooh Bear
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Joseph wrote:

On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 11:38:10 -0700, DaveC wrote:

Cell phone usage is restricted on all domestic commercial flights by the FAA,
so the flight attendant keeps telling me.

I seem to recall that this wasn't so, early in cellular history. Weren't we
able to use cell phones on flights, long ago?

Is cell phone usage also restricted on private jets, etc. for similar
reasons?


Restriction of cell phones from planes is not due to the interference
to avionics, but is more of concern that it will interfere with
land-based communications. When you're up at a height and you attempt
to use your phone you are hitting a whole lot of cell sites as once
and if lots of people did this it would make a real mess of land-based
cellular service. So it's more of an FCC mandate than it is of the
FAA.


I thought that the base station antenna patterns pretty much ignore any signal
greater than a few ( maybe ~10 ) degrees above the horizon.


Graham



  #42  
Old October 13th 04, 03:41 AM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Brian Case wrote:

Actually it could work very well, and I have seen this proposal from
several different sources. The Idea is to install a low power cell
phone tower into the airliner.


Well, it would work well, but not if they actually used the cellular frequencies
(AMPS). If they installed a PCS processor in the plane, modern PCS phones would
communicate with it and not fall back on the AMPS frequencies.

George Patterson
If a man gets into a fight 3,000 miles away from home, he *had* to have
been looking for it.
  #43  
Old October 13th 04, 03:41 AM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Brian Case wrote:

Actually it could work very well, and I have seen this proposal from
several different sources. The Idea is to install a low power cell
phone tower into the airliner.


Well, it would work well, but not if they actually used the cellular frequencies
(AMPS). If they installed a PCS processor in the plane, modern PCS phones would
communicate with it and not fall back on the AMPS frequencies.

George Patterson
If a man gets into a fight 3,000 miles away from home, he *had* to have
been looking for it.
  #44  
Old October 13th 04, 04:00 AM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Pooh Bear wrote:

The origin of the ban was due to concerns about cellphone transmissions
interfering with onboard avionics.


The origin of the ban on cellphone usage at altitude was to prevent phones from
hitting multiple receivers which were using the same frequency. The designers of the
AMPS system counted on being able to have many "cells" use the same frequency set
because they were far apart. Put the phone in the air, and several of these stations
would receive the transmissions from the call.

The origin of the FAA ban on electronic devices is as you say, but it is not unique
to cell phones.

George Patterson
If a man gets into a fight 3,000 miles away from home, he *had* to have
been looking for it.
  #45  
Old October 13th 04, 04:00 AM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Pooh Bear wrote:

The origin of the ban was due to concerns about cellphone transmissions
interfering with onboard avionics.


The origin of the ban on cellphone usage at altitude was to prevent phones from
hitting multiple receivers which were using the same frequency. The designers of the
AMPS system counted on being able to have many "cells" use the same frequency set
because they were far apart. Put the phone in the air, and several of these stations
would receive the transmissions from the call.

The origin of the FAA ban on electronic devices is as you say, but it is not unique
to cell phones.

George Patterson
If a man gets into a fight 3,000 miles away from home, he *had* to have
been looking for it.
  #46  
Old October 13th 04, 06:25 AM
Doug Kanter
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Pooh Bear" wrote in message
...
DaveC wrote:

Cell phone usage is restricted on all domestic commercial flights by the

FAA,
so the flight attendant keeps telling me.

I seem to recall that this wasn't so, early in cellular history. Weren't

we
able to use cell phones on flights, long ago?

Is cell phone usage also restricted on private jets, etc. for similar
reasons?

So my question... what is the technical reason for restriction of cell

phone
us on commercial flights? Is this reason valid, technically? Or is it

simply
an excuse to force anyone who needs to make a call to use the airline's
on-board phones (and pay their outrageous rates)?


The origin of the ban was due to concerns about cellphone transmissions
interfering with onboard avionics. This is more likely to be a concern

with older
a/c. There is no hard data that I know of that substantiates the concern.

There
is some anecdotal evidence of interference though.


Everyone's got a conspiracy theory. Here's another: The ban on cellular
phones is kept alive by the book publishing industry. Some in the evil cabal
may actually have the best intentions: Trying to get cell phone addicts to
shut the phuque up and try reading something for a change.


  #47  
Old October 13th 04, 06:25 AM
Doug Kanter
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Pooh Bear" wrote in message
...
DaveC wrote:

Cell phone usage is restricted on all domestic commercial flights by the

FAA,
so the flight attendant keeps telling me.

I seem to recall that this wasn't so, early in cellular history. Weren't

we
able to use cell phones on flights, long ago?

Is cell phone usage also restricted on private jets, etc. for similar
reasons?

So my question... what is the technical reason for restriction of cell

phone
us on commercial flights? Is this reason valid, technically? Or is it

simply
an excuse to force anyone who needs to make a call to use the airline's
on-board phones (and pay their outrageous rates)?


The origin of the ban was due to concerns about cellphone transmissions
interfering with onboard avionics. This is more likely to be a concern

with older
a/c. There is no hard data that I know of that substantiates the concern.

There
is some anecdotal evidence of interference though.


Everyone's got a conspiracy theory. Here's another: The ban on cellular
phones is kept alive by the book publishing industry. Some in the evil cabal
may actually have the best intentions: Trying to get cell phone addicts to
shut the phuque up and try reading something for a change.


  #48  
Old October 13th 04, 05:13 PM
Ron Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Pooh Bear wrote:

The origin of the ban was due to concerns about cellphone transmissions
interfering with onboard avionics. This is more likely to be a concern with older
a/c. There is no hard data that I know of that substantiates the concern. There
is some anecdotal evidence of interference though.


Sorry, there are two issues. The FAA has it's own concerns about ANY
electronic devices. There's not hard and fast info on a lot of these
devices and the FAA has gotten more restrictive over time. However, the
AMPS regs specifically prohibit it without specifying the reason. It would
seem unlikely that a prohibition against airborn use however has anything
to do with air navigation because NOTHING ELSE the FCC regulates really
addresses that issue.


As another poster has mentioned, cellphones don't work well at altitude.


Wrong. AMPS / Analog cell phones, the ones the regulatory applies to, work
just fine from altitude. Actually too well. That was demonstrated on 9/11.
However some of the digital (PCS, for example) services, don't work at all
airborne (but they are not prohibited by regulation either).
  #49  
Old October 13th 04, 05:16 PM
Ron Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

G.R. Patterson III wrote:

Brian Case wrote:

Actually it could work very well, and I have seen this proposal from
several different sources. The Idea is to install a low power cell
phone tower into the airliner.



Well, it would work well, but not if they actually used the cellular frequencies
(AMPS). If they installed a PCS processor in the plane, modern PCS phones would
communicate with it and not fall back on the AMPS frequencies.

It would be a real can of worms. If everybody had a GSM phone in the
US it might be doable. But every carrier these days tends to market
a multimode phone that bounces between CDMA, old style TDMA, analog AMPS,
GSM, and a couple of proprietary schemes like iDEN.

It's going to have to be a "only [insert carrier here]" phones work onboard
United's flights.
  #50  
Old October 13th 04, 11:36 PM
Teacherjh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

It would be a real can of worms

The real answer is for the cell carriers to make deals with Airphone, so that
one could use Airphone units already installed on the airplane, and be billed
by ones cell carrier, at ones local rates.

Jose

--
(for Email, make the obvious changes in my address)
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Watch them 12V Cell Phone Adapters TSA Panics Again NW_PILOT Piloting 7 October 13th 04 04:33 AM
Cell Phone in small plane Ron Home Built 1 August 6th 04 02:10 PM
Flying weather on your cell phone Jay Honeck Piloting 6 April 24th 04 01:59 AM
Interesting use of cell phone to command a sharp roll to the right! Peter Bondar Instrument Flight Rules 10 December 19th 03 02:27 PM
Palm cell phone and aviation Maule Driver Piloting 3 November 24th 03 11:52 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.