![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 07:24:56 -0700, "Leadfoot"
wrote: You notice that no supreme court justice has retired during this particular presidential term? There is a reason for that. Which is an interesting commentary on the state of the Supreme Court appointment and confirmation process. Clearly there are several members of the court who have expressed a desire to retire or who are demonstrably in declining health--Rehnquist, O'Conner, Ginsberg for example. Note one conservative, one swing and one liberal in their judicial temperment. Bush sought to have them delay retirement until '02 hoping for a greater majority in the Senate and therefore easier confirmation. That didn't occur. During the second half of his first term, he was forced to ask them to hold still longer (at least the conservative/swing member--the liberal member would delay hoping for a more sympathetic president/senate to determine her replacement.) Now, the '04 election will very clearly determine if the floodgates for a court transition are opened or simply trickle. We might have to see deaths on the Court rather than retirements. It isn't uncommon for a presidential term to go by without appointments to the Court--the average through the history of the court is about one per term and since there are plenty of examples of multiple appointments in a term, there are necessarily a lot of no-appointment presidential terms. Ed Rasimus Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret) "When Thunder Rolled" "Phantom Flights, Bangkok Nights" Both from Smithsonian Books ***www.thunderchief.org |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Leadfoot" wrote in message news:RgY1d.299705$Oi.151027@fed1read04... "Ragnar" wrote in message ... "Leadfoot" wrote in message news:nXN1d.298098$Oi.247686@fed1read04... "Ragnar" wrote in message ... "ArtKramr" wrote in message ... The vast majority of university professors and scholars are Democratic liberals. Very few are neocons. The neocons just can't make the cut into higher education. They just aren't smart enough as Bush so eloquently demonstrates. So, if Bush is so stupid, why is he President and you're just a bitter old man? Because the supreme court elected him, Ah, another person who wasn't paying attention to the US and Florida Supreme Court decisions. Read up on it and come back. You notice that no supreme court justice has retired during this particular presidential term? There is a reason for that. And? Remember the other guy had more people vote for him Umm, the President isn't elected by popular vote. Go read the Constitution and come back. What? Not finished reading it yet? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Leadfoot wrote:
You notice that no supreme court justice has retired during this particular presidential term? There is a reason for that. Because they aren't ready to retire? JPH |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No, he didn't.
The (totally irrelevant) "popular vote" had a margin of error greater than the difference in numbers. In other words, the most you can say about the (totally irrelevant) "popular vote" is that "out of those ballots that were actually counted [and many were not], it was a tie." Jeeze, this is what, the third time in two months this has been thoroughly explained and then discussed? Steve Swartz (OBTW, just because the "popular media" continues to repeat the lie of "Gore won the [totally irrelevant] popular vote" doesn't make it any less a lie. It just means that those in the popular media are stupid. But we know that already.) "Leadfoot" wrote in message news:nXN1d.298098$Oi.247686@fed1read04... "Ragnar" wrote in message ... "ArtKramr" wrote in message ... The vast majority of university professors and scholars are Democratic liberals. Very few are neocons. The neocons just can't make the cut into higher education. They just aren't smart enough as Bush so eloquently demonstrates. So, if Bush is so stupid, why is he President and you're just a bitter old man? Because the supreme court elected him, Remember the other guy had more people vote for him |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I took a ride in a Ford TriMotor - so I'm an expert on tomato plants &
corrugated metals. Apparently, flying in a B-26 doesn't inoculate one from arrogance, stupidity, historical illiteracy or bad judgment. (ArtKramr) wrote, amongst other things: How would you know?. I'll bet you have never even seen a B-26 much less flew in one. Or anything for that matter. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"ArtKramr" wrote
The vast majority... Now you sound like Mike Allen at the Washington Post who says: "...according to the calculations of independent domestic policy experts." Whoever the **** that is. Kramer, you're a ****-up. Your whole racist crew was a ****-up. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Subject: PROOF THAT NEOCONS ARE STUPID
From: Ian MacLure Date: 9/15/2004 9:19 PM Pacific Daylight Time Message-id: "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in link.net: "Kevin Brooks" wrote in message ... What's a neocon? Why won't you answer that question? It's because he doesn't know. He is uneducated and unintelligent. You forgot incompetent, insufferable and incontinent. IBM Intelligent enough to get into air cadets,graduate and make air crew as a bombardier which is more than can be said for either of you |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Lisakbernacchia" wrote in message ... Intelligent enough to get into air cadets,graduate and make air crew as a bombardier which is more than can be said for either of you How do you know that? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Subject: PROOF THAT NEOCONS ARE STUPID
From: "Steven P. McNicoll" Date: 9/16/2004 5:06 AM Pacific Daylight Time Message-id: et "Lisakbernacchia" wrote in message ... Intelligent enough to get into air cadets,graduate and make air crew as a bombardier which is more than can be said for either of you How do you know that? So you are now claiming to be an Air Cadet graduate who went into combat as aircrew? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Lisakbernacchia" wrote in message ... Subject: PROOF THAT NEOCONS ARE STUPID From: "Steven P. McNicoll" Date: 9/16/2004 5:06 AM Pacific Daylight Time Message-id: et "Lisakbernacchia" wrote in message ... Intelligent enough to get into air cadets,graduate and make air crew as a bombardier which is more than can be said for either of you How do you know that? So you are now claiming to be an Air Cadet graduate who went into combat as aircrew? No. How did you make that leap? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! __________-+__ ihuvpe | RobertR237 | Home Built | 84 | November 26th 04 05:19 PM |
(NEOCONS) GOING BACK WHERE THEY CAME FROM | MORRIS434 | Military Aviation | 0 | April 23rd 04 02:29 PM |
No US soldier should have 2 die for Israel 4 oil | Ewe n0 who | Military Aviation | 1 | April 9th 04 11:25 PM |
No End to War | Grantland | Military Aviation | 0 | March 26th 04 04:20 AM |
De Borchgrave: WMD, Gulf of Tonkin, and Neocons | MORRIS434 | Military Aviation | 0 | February 12th 04 08:41 PM |