A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Naval Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Was The Grumman "Bearcat" Flown Off Carriers?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old January 23rd 04, 03:45 AM
Jack G
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

How about a GU11?

Jack
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Ogden Johnson III" wrote in message
...

The USAAF/USAF system didn't permit any fun aircraft, like B1RDs.


The Navy system didn't allow a B1RD.




  #42  
Old January 23rd 04, 04:06 AM
Ogden Johnson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:

"Ogden Johnson III" wrote


The USAAF/USAF system didn't permit any fun aircraft, like B1RDs.


The Navy system didn't allow a B1RD.


Unlike the Air Farce, the USN/USMC are military services, and
have a sense of humor; so they never let inconsequential
technicalities stand in the way of a joke.
--
OJ III
[Email sent to Yahoo addy is burned before reading.
Lower and crunch the sig and you'll net me at comcast]
  #43  
Old January 23rd 04, 04:10 AM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Jack G" wrote in message
...

How about a GU11?


Nope. What type aircraft would the letters GU designate? Where's the
manufacturer's letter?


  #44  
Old January 23rd 04, 04:12 AM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ogden Johnson III" wrote in message
...

Unlike the Air Farce, the USN/USMC are military services, and
have a sense of humor; so they never let inconsequential
technicalities stand in the way of a joke.


I guess the USAF types must just have a more sophisticated sense of humor.


  #45  
Old January 23rd 04, 04:23 AM
Orval Fairbairn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article . net,
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:

"Ogden Johnson III" wrote in message
...

The USAAF/USAF system didn't permit any fun aircraft, like B1RDs.


The Navy system didn't allow a B1RD.



Ah, but it DID allow R4Q and R4Q2
  #46  
Old January 23rd 04, 04:36 AM
Thomas Schoene
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
"Jack G" wrote in message
...

How about a GU11?


Nope. What type aircraft would the letters GU designate?


It's a special type used to deliver letters to the mail buoy. Its presence
has been known to attract seabats, which the crews capture and take aboard
ships as pets.





Or in the immortal words of Foghorn Leghorn, "That's a joke, son."

--
Tom Schoene Replace "invalid" with "net" to e-mail
"If brave men and women never died, there would be nothing
special about bravery." -- Andy Rooney (attributed)




  #47  
Old January 23rd 04, 04:42 AM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Orval Fairbairn" wrote in message
news

Ah, but it DID allow R4Q and R4Q2


No, but it could have allowed R4Q-2, if a manufacturer had been assigned the
letter Q.


  #48  
Old January 23rd 04, 04:43 AM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Thomas Schoene" wrote in message
ink.net...

Or in the immortal words of Foghorn Leghorn, "That's a joke, son."


See my previous post about sophisticated humor. If you have to say it's a
joke, it ain't.


  #49  
Old January 23rd 04, 04:49 AM
Thomas Schoene
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
"Thomas Schoene" wrote in message
link.net...

I'd call it a bug, not a feature. If it told you the designer, it
might be of some value, but manufacturer names are often too fluid
to be helpful. As is, the system is potentially quite confusing, as
the examples given before can show (F4U, FG and F3B are the same
plane!?!)


Ah, but they're not the same plane! The F4U was, of course, the
Vought Corsair, and the FG was a Corsair built by Goodyear. But the
F3B was a Boeing biplane fighter of the late twenties. The
Brewster-built Corsair was the F3A.


Hmm, I think we just proved our collective point. :-)



--
Tom Schoene Replace "invalid" with "net" to e-mail
"If brave men and women never died, there would be nothing
special about bravery." -- Andy Rooney (attributed)




  #50  
Old January 23rd 04, 04:54 AM
Jack G
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Q was assigned to:

Bristol
Fairchild
Stinson
Chas. Ward Hall Inc.

The R4Q-1 and R4Q-2 were the Marine version of the Fairchild C-119 Packet -
AKA Flying Boxcar.

Jack

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
link.net...

"Orval Fairbairn" wrote in message

news

Ah, but it DID allow R4Q and R4Q2


No, but it could have allowed R4Q-2, if a manufacturer had been assigned

the
letter Q.




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Grumman FAAV? Charles Gray Military Aviation 1 July 19th 04 06:55 AM
Most aircraft types flown by 1 pilot? Chad Irby Military Aviation 10 January 7th 04 03:47 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.