![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
He can't if the plane you are flying is not equipped with an ADF. My 3
approaches were LOC, VOR and ILS. If it's in the plane, he can ask you to demonstrate it's use. wrote: Roy Smith wrote: Mark Hansen wrote: I have to wonder, though, if spending any time on NDB skills really makes sense these days. VOR, yes, but NDB??? Roy, What are you asking? Am I interpreting my October 2004 ASA PTS wrong? Can't the examiner choose an NDB IAP? a. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Guillermo wrote:
Flying under IMC rocks. I've flown my wife in the clouds two really good times. Once we were cruising just about (and slightly in) a layer. Another time we flew amongst tiny little buildups. It was fun to finally share these views with her. We were "cotton balled" only one. That was kind of dull...but it was fun when the world reappeared. - Andrew |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
xxx wrote:
I've got about 6 hours now and find it not the slightest bit fun. Can anyone remind me why I'm inflicting this on myself? First, a few questions: 1. What is your motivation to obtain the instrument rating? 2. What exactly don't you find to be fun? 3. Have you taken the written? Matt |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert Chambers wrote:
Don't worry it gets worse! That's for sure. I think my low point came at around 20 hours. Seemed like things would just never come together at the same place and time. Nothing worth having like this comes without some sweat equity, but it is worth having and you will make use of it. Absolutely, assuming the right motivation to begin with. Matt |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, now I'm thinking.
Who is authorized to paste an INOP sticker on avionics? And of course removing the sticker later? Sure I could remove the ADF. But, I have an RNAV and AP too (the RNAV contains the localizer converter so it cant be removed). This could be sweet :-) a. |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy Smith wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote: ... of course, I'm only at the beginning (10.4 hours). I'm reasonably proficient at Attitude Instrument Flying and have just started on VOR/NDB nav, so we'll see how I feel when things really start popping. Kudos to your instructor for making sure you've got BAI down pat before moving onto navigation. If you've still got to give any real thought to holding heading and altitude, it's too early to move onto other stuff. I think a lot of instructors push straight on to approaches before the student is really ready. I have to wonder, though, if spending any time on NDB skills really makes sense these days. VOR, yes, but NDB??? Well, one reason is that it shows pretty quickly if you REALLY can hold a heading, altitude and do some simple mental math simultaneously! :-) I agree that spending a lot of time on NDB approaches is probably a waste, but I still think learning to navigate accurately using an ADF is good basic training. Matt |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert M. Gary wrote:
I live near Sacramento. After my IR I took the family down to Monterey in the middle of summer. Not only was it great to get out of the heat of the valley, but Monterey is almost always IMC in the middle of summer. My first actual IMC was solo (with the family) in a rented Bonanza flying the ILS in actual in Monterey. Not sure I would do it that way again. I did my first alone one a business trip to Logan. I figured I only wanted to kill myself if I screwed up. I don't think I'd recommend making a first IFR flight into an airport the size of Logan, however, at least I was flying into improving weather and it ended up being even better than forecast by the time I arrived. Matt |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Guillermo wrote:
"Andrew Gideon" wrote in message online.com... xxx wrote: If you're lucky, once you get far enough into the training, you'll spend more time in actual. That's not only good training, but also time free of the foggles. Yea, flying under the foggles sucks. Flying under IMC rocks. And you got to fly IMC if you want to realize how worthless our sense of balance is without visual reference. I had read about it before, but it wasn't until I flew IMC till I realized how much our senses suck in that respect. I took a lot of my training at night (it was in the winter in the northeast) and many nights I really didn't need much view limiting ... especially when it was snowing. :-) I found learning at night made it much easier to fly in IMC in the day. If you can fly and read the charts in the dark, doing same during the day is a piece of cake. Matt |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
WINGS: When do the clocks start ticking? | Andrew Gideon | Piloting | 6 | February 3rd 04 03:01 PM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
PC flight simulators | Bjørnar Bolsøy | Military Aviation | 178 | December 14th 03 12:14 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |