A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Moving Map: North-Up vs. Track-Up



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 26th 05, 01:06 AM
Peter Clark
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 13:36:12 +0200, "Kai Glaesner"
wrote:

Hello,

ran into a discussion with a pilot-friend-of-mine on sunday about how to set
up our GNS430 on a short IFR Trip.

I prefer a North-Up mode, because it makes it easier for me to corelate
what's on the screen with the paper-charts I have on my kneeboard.

He wanted it to be in either Track-Up or (me complaining about a
too-frequent need for redraw) Desired-Track-Up mode. Reason was he wanted
the screen helping him to build a "mental-picture" about what's ahead and
around.

No consens was found so I would like to hear from you: are your a "North-Up"
or a "Track-Up" sort of pilot (explanation why you are would help)?


I use track up. I find it easier to view the map in relation to what
I see out the window (and was trained to move the chart on my lap to
orient the same way). I find it also makes TIS target acquisition
faster because I can look at the map for the dot, then turn my head in
that direction - no re-orienting the map in my head and then figuring
out where they are then looking.

  #2  
Old July 26th 05, 01:25 AM
Michelle P
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Track up.
relative position on screen is relative position around airplane.
I rotate maps for track up. I can read upside down I have a hard time
transposing shapes on the ground to the paper when they are not in the
same orientation.
Michelle

Kai Glaesner wrote:

Hello,

ran into a discussion with a pilot-friend-of-mine on sunday about how to set
up our GNS430 on a short IFR Trip.

I prefer a North-Up mode, because it makes it easier for me to corelate
what's on the screen with the paper-charts I have on my kneeboard.

He wanted it to be in either Track-Up or (me complaining about a
too-frequent need for redraw) Desired-Track-Up mode. Reason was he wanted
the screen helping him to build a "mental-picture" about what's ahead and
around.

No consens was found so I would like to hear from you: are your a "North-Up"
or a "Track-Up" sort of pilot (explanation why you are would help)?

Best Regards

Kai

--
Return address is invalid to help stop junk mail.





  #3  
Old July 26th 05, 01:29 AM
Ron Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Kai Glaesner wrote:
Hello,

ran into a discussion with a pilot-friend-of-mine on sunday about how to set
up our GNS430 on a short IFR Trip.

I prefer a North-Up mode, because it makes it easier for me to corelate
what's on the screen with the paper-charts I have on my kneeboard.

Just to be perverse, I have my MX20 set up right now in North-Up mode
while the GNS480 spends most of it's time in the "arc-HSI" track up mode.
  #4  
Old July 26th 05, 03:43 AM
Roger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 13:36:12 +0200, "Kai Glaesner"
wrote:

Hello,

ran into a discussion with a pilot-friend-of-mine on sunday about how to set
up our GNS430 on a short IFR Trip.

I prefer a North-Up mode, because it makes it easier for me to corelate
what's on the screen with the paper-charts I have on my kneeboard.

He wanted it to be in either Track-Up or (me complaining about a
too-frequent need for redraw) Desired-Track-Up mode. Reason was he wanted
the screen helping him to build a "mental-picture" about what's ahead and
around.

No consens was found so I would like to hear from you: are your a "North-Up"
or a "Track-Up" sort of pilot (explanation why you are would help)?


To me? Makes no difference. I've used both modes.
Although I guess I do have a slight preference to track up.
OTOH I have no problem reorienting between the charts and the moving
map.

I get the basic information from the map but usually do most on the
GPS.

Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com

Best Regards

Kai


  #5  
Old July 26th 05, 06:11 AM
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Kai Glaesner" wrote in message
m...
[...]
No consens was found so I would like to hear from you: are your a
"North-Up"
or a "Track-Up" sort of pilot (explanation why you are would help)?


Geez. Why don't you just ask "high-wing or low-wing" and get it over with.


  #6  
Old July 26th 05, 02:53 PM
John T
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

GPS = Track up
Chart = North up

I tend to use the GPS for tactical situational awareness and use the chart
for more strategic SA.

--
John T
http://tknowlogy.com/TknoFlyer
http://www.pocketgear.com/products_s...veloperid=4415
Reduce spam. Use Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com
____________________



  #7  
Old July 26th 05, 04:08 PM
AES
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
"John T" wrote:

GPS = Track up
Chart = North up

I tend to use the GPS for tactical situational awareness and use the chart
for more strategic SA.


Just want to express admiration for the terse but effective phrasing
he "tactical SA" and "strategic SA" seem very effective ways of
characterizing the two approaches.
  #8  
Old July 27th 05, 04:57 PM
Trent Moorehead
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Kai Glaesner" wrote in message
m...
Hello,


No consens was found so I would like to hear from you: are your a

"North-Up"
or a "Track-Up" sort of pilot (explanation why you are would help)?


Track up.


  #9  
Old July 28th 05, 03:40 AM
Jonathan Goodish
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
"Kai Glaesner" wrote:
No consens was found so I would like to hear from you: are your a "North-Up"
or a "Track-Up" sort of pilot (explanation why you are would help)?



My wife likes north-up, so that's what we use. I find it easier in most
cases, simply because I'm using to looking at an old Garmin 195 that
didn't do track-up. If I were new to moving map GPSs, I would probably
prefer track-up.



JKG
  #10  
Old July 28th 05, 03:56 PM
JohnH
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jonathan Goodish wrote:
In article ,
"Kai Glaesner" wrote:
No consens was found so I would like to hear from you: are your a
"North-Up" or a "Track-Up" sort of pilot (explanation why you are
would help)?



My wife likes north-up, so that's what we use. I find it easier in
most cases, simply because I'm using to looking at an old Garmin 195
that didn't do track-up. If I were new to moving map GPSs, I would
probably prefer track-up.


How dare you slap poor Shawn in the face like that?


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Air Ops North Atlantic - Ron Knott Greasy Rider© @invalid.com Naval Aviation 1 June 4th 05 06:52 PM
Pirep: Garmin GPSMAP 296 versus 295. (very long) Jon Woellhaf Piloting 12 September 4th 04 11:55 PM
Moving to Alaska, anyone need glider transported north from NM Jeff Landfield Soaring 0 July 9th 04 04:46 AM
The battle for Arlington Airport begins? Paul Adriance Home Built 45 March 30th 04 11:41 PM
N. Korea Agrees to Nuke Talks Dav1936531 Military Aviation 1 August 2nd 03 06:53 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.