![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
George Patterson wrote:
Looks like she's packing a pair of 38s to me. Oh... 38s, I was thinking 357magnums or 44 magnums. Well they certainly ARE magnums for sure. Well, maybe they could be 38 SPECIALS. |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Morgans wrote:
"Ramapriya" wrote er... to change directions in the air, Jim. I hope it isn't another insinuation :\ No, No, No. Why does everyone think I am insinuating things. I'm really a nice guy, to people who are nice to me. You have not been put in any other category, by me. Thanks, mate ![]() My question is why would the cargo use make the roll being different than a passenger use? Also, I always thought excessive dihedral would just require more rudder, and that it would return to level flight more easily. But I've heard that it's the dihedral that causes difficulties in banking heavy cargo airplanes, and that was how the anhedral concept was thought up. I could be wrong ![]() Ramapriya |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ramapriya" wrote
But I've heard that it's the dihedral that causes difficulties in banking heavy cargo airplanes, and that was how the anhedral concept was thought up. I could be wrong ![]() Ah....I bet that discussion dealt with "high" wing cargo planes where all of the load is below the wing such as in the C-5 with its anhedral. The same situation doesn't hold true for a "low" wing cargo plane where most of the load is carried above the wing. :-) Long distance communications is difficult....Eh? Bob Moore |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob Moore wrote:
Ah....I bet that discussion dealt with "high" wing cargo planes where all of the load is below the wing such as in the C-5 with its anhedral. The same situation doesn't hold true for a "low" wing cargo plane where most of the load is carried above the wing. :-) Long distance communications is difficult....Eh? Bob Moore Yep ![]() Some difficulties with Skype installation here, Bob; apparently there's a firewall against it by my ISP ![]() I'm having an IT chap help me out with some 'port tunneling', whatever that is... Ramapriya |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bob Moore" wrote in message I'm betting that all of the A-380s wind-up in all cargo service. :-) Bob Moore I've had the same thought from time to time. A pax craft that size will have niche applications, to be sure, but any broadbased passenger usage will require extensive reworking of ground facilities. Not so to any great extent for cargo. Just remote park, gross 'er out, and go! |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Gaquin" wrote in message ... "Bob Moore" wrote in message I'm betting that all of the A-380s wind-up in all cargo service. :-) Bob Moore I've had the same thought from time to time. A pax craft that size will have niche applications, to be sure, but any broadbased passenger usage will require extensive reworking of ground facilities. Not so to any great extent for cargo. Just remote park, gross 'er out, and go! That's already been happening. Terminal three a London Heathrow has already been upgraded to take the A380 with double deck docking stations and extra strong taxiway and parking. Many of the airports on the routes to Asia from Europe are or are nearly are A380 ready. It would be a bit problem flying into the US. Its bad enough a 777 load of passengers trying to get through immigration. By the time a load of A380 passengers got through the vacation would be over and its time to go home:-) |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bushleague" wrote in message
At least the cabin crew won't bust you for being on "baby mins"! Actually, we have an ops spec that relieves the high mins requirement as we train Cat III. Lots more seats than our carrier who are you with? The other guys.. :-) I don't disclose too many details on Usenet because of the loons. Make some changes to the reply address and send me an e-mail. I used to fly with some of your senior pilots in previous jobs. D. |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Us Airways
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 20:06:08 GMT, "Capt.Doug" wrote: "Flyingmonk" wrote in message Nice post Capt. Thanks for sharing. What is your route? Overseas? West Coast? East Coast?... Seniority is good, if you're at the top. I end up going throughout the system. I prefer the Caribbean routes but many times don't have a choice. D. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? | tom pettit | Home Built | 35 | September 29th 05 02:24 PM |
Mini-500 Accident Analysis | Dennis Fetters | Rotorcraft | 16 | September 3rd 05 11:35 AM |
millionaire on the Internet... in weeks! | Malcolm Austin | Soaring | 0 | November 5th 04 11:14 PM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
AmeriFlight Crash | C J Campbell | Piloting | 5 | December 1st 03 02:13 PM |