![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jackal24 wrote:
"Jay Honeck" wrote in oups.com: About a month ago here, the high temp was -25F, with wind chills around - 50F. Now that is an "extreme wind chill". Good God, man. Where do you live? I'm working in Bethel, AK. Fascinating - the magnetic deviation from true north at the Bethel airport appears to be large enough that runways 18 and 36 have a considerable slant in the Google Earth satellite image, which is normally drawn squared with true north: http://www.google.com/maps?q=Bethel,...70124&t=k&om=1 So what's the deal with runway 29?? |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Logajan wrote in
: Fascinating - the magnetic deviation from true north at the Bethel airport appears to be large enough that runways 18 and 36 have a considerable slant in the Google Earth satellite image, which is normally drawn squared with true north: http://www.google.com/maps?q=Bethel,...60.780179,-161. 840158&spn=0.019106,0.070124&t=k&om=1 So what's the deal with runway 29?? 11/29 is mostly gravel with a short paved stretch. It comes in handy when the wind is blowing out of the east at 30 kts. Also, not shown on that image is the fact that they are currently working on building a parallel runway to 18/36. Tyson |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My desktop weather (courtesy of the Weather
Channel) is now blinking red, warning me (and millions of others) to dress warmly, and to not go outside. It's not the nanny state you are seeing. It's far more insidious. It is extremely difficult to get an answer about how something works these days. However, it's very easy to find out how to work it. People want to be told what button to push. They don't want to know what happens when they push it. I don't know what came first, but I find very few people who even see a problem. Jose -- Humans are pack animals. Above all things, they have a deep need to follow something, be it a leader, a creed, or a mob. Whosoever fully understands this holds the world in his hands. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What? You couldn't handle the Michigan weather so you moved south for
your health? There's a joke that goes something like: When it's 50 degrees, Floridians put on their coats... Wisconsoners go swimming. When it's 30, Floridians stay inside, Wisconsoners put on a t-shirt... when it's 10 below, Wisconsoners put on a sweater... Different states, different temperatures, but I can't seem to find it. Anyone know the way it goes? Jose -- Humans are pack animals. Above all things, they have a deep need to follow something, be it a leader, a creed, or a mob. Whosoever fully understands this holds the world in his hands. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jose writes:
It is extremely difficult to get an answer about how something works these days. However, it's very easy to find out how to work it. People want to be told what button to push. They don't want to know what happens when they push it. I don't know what came first, but I find very few people who even see a problem. In a technologically advanced state, inevitably the percentage of the population that knows how technologies work will shrink, whereas the percentage of the population that uses those technologies regularly will increase. Thus, the more advanced the state, the more people you have who regularly use technologies they don't understand. When people lived in caves, it's likely that everyone understood all the technologies he had to use, or nearly so. Today, almost nobody understands even a fraction of the technology that he uses each day, and indeed we all depend on technologies the workings of which we don't fully understand. The problem, then, arises whenever someone must step outside the very small envelope of interactions with a technology for which he is competent. We all know how to push buttons on a telephone to make a telephone call (the standard envelope), but how many of us know what to do if the buttons don't work as expected. Aviation is just one of many high-tech domains in which there are many who understand the standard envelope while not mastering the extended envelope; and I'm talking pilots here, not passengers. I notice this in discussions on this group. Most pilots (like most people in general) learn by rote, because this allows people to make use of technologies that they wouldn't be able to easily understand if they had to study the fundamental theory. This is why, for example, pilots here will insist that trim is used to relieve control pressures, and reject any other explanation of trim, even when the other explanations are precisely equivalent to their own. They learned the control-pressure explanation by rote, and they don't actually understand the theory behind trim, so they reject any explanation that doesn't correspond to what they were taught. Only someone who learned the actual theory will recognize multiple explanations as being mutually equivalent, and such people are rare. Training programs for complex activities typically emphasize rote learning, in order to keep those activities accessible to people with a wide range of intelligence levels. Forcing everyone to learn theory would exclude a significant chunk of trainees who might have trouble grasping abstract theory as opposed to a cookbook, rote approach to tasks. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thus, the more advanced the state, the more people you have who
regularly use technologies they don't understand. I'm not talking about not understanding, I'm talking about not =wanting= to understand, and (on the flip side) refusing to explain. This is why, for example, pilots here will insist that trim is used to relieve control pressures Trim =is= used to relieve control pressure (*). That is the "what button to push" question. It is the "how do I use trim", not "what happens when I use trim". You seem to be asking (without successfully communicating the distinction) "what, in detail, happens when trim is adjusted?", the answer to which depends on the individual setup. You also got hung up on a "neutral position", which either doesn't exist, or can be defined arbitrarily (just like the w/b datum). And yes, that's an example of being unsuccessful finding out "what happens when I do this", which really is "what ELSE happens (that nobody is telling me!) when I do this". Jose (*) ... in non-fly-by-wire aircraft anyway. -- Humans are pack animals. Above all things, they have a deep need to follow something, be it a leader, a creed, or a mob. Whosoever fully understands this holds the world in his hands. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jose writes:
Trim =is= used to relieve control pressure (*). That is only one of multiple possible uses for trim. Adjusting trim holds control surfaces in fixed, non-neutral positions. Relieving control pressure is not the only reason for doing that. The autopilot doesn't use trim to relieve control pressure. You seem to be asking (without successfully communicating the distinction) "what, in detail, happens when trim is adjusted?", the answer to which depends on the individual setup. Trim pretty much causes the same thing to happen fundamentally on all aircraft. You also got hung up on a "neutral position", which either doesn't exist, or can be defined arbitrarily (just like the w/b datum). A neutral position is easy enough to understand. Neutral trim produces the same effect as the complete absence of trim tabs. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I won't continue beyond the following statements:
Adjusting trim holds control surfaces in fixed, non-neutral positions. No, it doesn't. Aerodynamic forces still work on the control surfaces, and they are still free to move. The autopilot doesn't use trim to relieve control pressure. Yes, it does. It just doesn't sense pressure the same way a pilot does. You seem to be asking (without successfully communicating the distinction) "what, in detail, happens when trim is adjusted?", the answer to which depends on the individual setup. Trim pretty much causes the same thing to happen fundamentally on all aircraft. That statement is a perfect indication of the difference between "what button do I push?" and "what happens when I push the button?". It may "cause the same thing to happen", but it causes it in different ways. A neutral position is easy enough to understand. Neutral trim produces the same effect as the complete absence of trim tabs. This is an acceptable but arbitrary definition which would work for aircraft with trim tabs. This putative neutral position however has no aviation significance (it doesn't correspond to any useful pilot input or requirement), and is utterly meaningless for other trim methods, such as bungee or jackscrew. And that's all I have to say about that. Jose -- Humans are pack animals. Above all things, they have a deep need to follow something, be it a leader, a creed, or a mob. Whosoever fully understands this holds the world in his hands. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
![]() -- NOTICE!!!! Mxsmanic is NOT a pilot, has NEVER flown an aircraft and is NOT qualified to issue competent information regarding any aspect of the operation of any aircraft. "Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... Jose writes: Trim =is= used to relieve control pressure (*). That is only one of multiple possible uses for trim. Adjusting trim holds control surfaces in fixed, non-neutral positions. Relieving control pressure is not the only reason for doing that. The autopilot doesn't use trim to relieve control pressure. You seem to be asking (without successfully communicating the distinction) "what, in detail, happens when trim is adjusted?", the answer to which depends on the individual setup. Trim pretty much causes the same thing to happen fundamentally on all aircraft. You also got hung up on a "neutral position", which either doesn't exist, or can be defined arbitrarily (just like the w/b datum). A neutral position is easy enough to understand. Neutral trim produces the same effect as the complete absence of trim tabs. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
NOTICE!!!!
Mxsmanic is NOT a pilot I know this. Jose -- Humans are pack animals. Above all things, they have a deep need to follow something, be it a leader, a creed, or a mob. Whosoever fully understands this holds the world in his hands. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I want to build the most EVIL plane EVER !!! | Eliot Coweye | Home Built | 237 | February 13th 06 03:55 AM |
Mini-500 Accident Analysis | Dennis Fetters | Rotorcraft | 16 | September 3rd 05 11:35 AM |
Headwinds, always | Paul kgyy | Piloting | 36 | June 9th 05 01:05 AM |