![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote:
Jose writes: Yes, but if an official in that state calls something a Threat To National Security, then that Threat has to be taken Seriously. Which law mandates this? Is it anything like lettres de cachet? No, that's French. |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Al G" wrote:
I've been a CFI in Oregon for 30+ years and am well aware of Oregon Airmen Registration, but have never heard of this wording. I once registered after a couple year layoff, and offered to pay the back fees. A very nice lady called my office, and said that she had never had anyone offer to pay back fees before, and they didn't know how to handle it. I told her to donate it to the SAR fund, which by the way, is where every dime of this money goes. It probably only yields ~$96,000/year. Subtract off processing and there is not likely to be a lot left. I can't see any fiscal advantage to enforcement since the fund would probably go into the red paying all the paperwork overhead and legal fees if even a small fraction of pilots put up a defense against paying. (I can't find the number of pilots who have residence in Oregon, but a crude approximation is to divide the total U.S. pilot population of ~ 600,000 by 50 and multiply by $8/year to get the above figure.) Thanks Jim for bringing this to my attention. We have a VERY vocal EAA here in Oregon, and we could probably follow this up a bit. This should be changed before some eager bureaucrat gets the idiotic notion he can collect from everybody that flies past. A law that is written this way, and then not enforced, opens the opportunity for selective enforcement, which is very bad. Perhaps it might be worth while to check to see if the clause that makes the pilot information publicly available violates any Oregon privacy laws the state government has to abide by. I appreciate the local EAA but I have to admit that so far I'm only a member of the national EAA. I keep meaning to join the local chapter (EAA 31) but it seems redundant at the moment since I haven't got a pilot certificate yet! |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "Al G" wrote:
lady called my office, and said that she had never had anyone offer to pay back fees before, and they didn't know how to handle it. I told her to donate it to the SAR fund, which by the way, is where every dime of this money goes. I have a hard time believing that every dime of the money actually goes to the SAR fund and will continue to go there. Someone will eventually claim that the fund needs to pay for the infrastructure of bill collecting, etc etc -- Bob Noel (goodness, please trim replies!!!) |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: Jose writes: The marshals have an interest in Threats To National Security. A failure to register under an unconstitutional State law is not a threat to national security, although it is certainly a threat to civil liberties and constitutional rights. Wonder how you know that... Actualy, I don't wonder. Bertie |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Logajan" wrote in message .. . "837.020 Registration of pilots; renewal. (1) In the interest of public safety and the safety of those people traveling by air or receiving aviation instruction, every pilot operating within this state shall register with the Oregon Department of Aviation within 60 days of issuance of any appropriate effective federal certificate, permit, rating or license relating to Yeah, they've been trying to get me to do that since 1990. Every three years or so I get a post card. I think they look for you based on medical certificates. -c Oregon |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Robert M. Gary" wrote in message oups.com... On Jun 11, 6:21 am, "Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net If that were true medical pot smoking would be legal in California. People go to jail for this in California because its a federal law even though the state as a registration system for users who have Dr approval. When my mom was dieing the Dr even suggested she try it (she didn't). Its legal according to the state but if the feds find out she'd go to jail. Ironically, they'd have to pick up her medical expenses. -c |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net wrote in message ... Yes, but if an official in that state calls something a Threat To National Security, then that Threat has to be taken Seriously. Fine, please show one example where the marshalls have tried to enforce this or some other silly state law. That's the real deal right there. Who's been busted for it? Similarly wrt to pot, the police will raid a place but as long as there's a permit, they leave it alone. The rule is something like seven plants, but they measure a plant by the stalk. So growers will bundle however many plants they can into one "stalk", put it all in one giant bucket, and it's legal. A cop told me they've found situations with seven planter pots filling the entire room of a house, with maybe a dozen stalks per flowerpot, and they don't even push the issue. If other crimes are involved, however, it becomes an entirely different matter. Then they lump all that together and hit you for everything they can. So the moral is, if you pass through Oregon in an airplane, don't commit a crime. -c |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Logajan" wrote in message .. . How do you know where to look to find out which entity wants to put their hands in your pocket each time you land at an airport in their jurisdiction? Kinda reminds me of the Part 121 additions (scenic flights, etc) I'm not afraid that I'll get caught doing something wrong, I'm afraid I'll do something without knowing it's wrong and get cited on some convoluted bureaucratic technicality. -c |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Rocky" wrote in message om... As a resident of Oregon for 37+ years I will chime in here. If a pilot lives here and flys he/she must register and pay the 8$ a year. *cough* What? What happens if you don't? -c Oregon |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
![]() As a resident of Oregon for 37+ years I will chime in here. If a pilot lives here and flys he/she must register and pay the 8$ a year. *cough* What? What happens if you don't? -c Oregon Dunno, I stopped flying in '86 and have not paid since. Got a few post cards asking for the payment but I replied that I don't fly anymore.....Case closed. I would think if you refused to pay the fees and sometime later crashed and used the S&R services the state provides, You would probably see a fairly LARGE bill in the mail to cover the expenses. After that I would asume real and personal property liens etc..... I have never heard of the state going to those measures yet. Look at it this way, its only $8 a year for ACTIVE pilots. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Flying from Canada into Washington State | randall g | Piloting | 5 | October 31st 06 12:58 AM |
NY State wants to fingerprint student pilots | Roy Smith | General Aviation | 7 | July 15th 06 02:07 PM |
USA: Attention New York State Pilots | Tim Hanke | Soaring | 0 | June 28th 06 08:06 PM |
Flying to Ashland/Medford Oregon | Ron Rosenfeld | Piloting | 10 | September 5th 04 06:14 PM |
Flying from Washington state to Canada | Ross Oliver | Piloting | 33 | June 24th 04 07:03 PM |