![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Bertie 2P is twice propeller speed. With two blades it means each blade caused one of the vibrations points each revolution. The T-28B (Navy) version had a 1425 HP Wright R-1820. They must have added some strength to wing for big engine? I never saw what mods they did to 'A' version to make the 'B' ?????? The AF also modified some A's for VN with the R-1820 (think they were called T-28D's???) Long time ago in a far away land ![]() Big John ***************************************** On Fri, 9 Nov 2007 00:36:27 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Big John wrote in : Bertie I did some service testing at Edwards on the T-28A. Things found there. Bird had a bad 2P vibration in cockpit. Was caused by each of the big wide blades of prop blowing big chunk of air back on the original canopy which was much taller that the one ending up on bird. Felt like sitting inside a base drum. OK, you're going to have to tell me what 2P means... A C-47 or T-29 (forget which one) 3 blade'd prop was cut down to the correct size and the three thinner blades cured the problem but Aero Products had completed their order for the big fat props and they were in storage in a warehouse so it was felt too expensive to can them and put new props on bird. Also the engine was a 7 cylinder 800 HP Wright and not the smoothest running engine ever built. Almost 115 HP per cylinder. Chug, chug,chug. Oh, OK, I thought they had 1830s or R2000's In fact, didn;t they eventually go to R2800's with them? an awful lot bigger than a T-6 for a "mere" 800hp. I ferried one of the first group (5) of birds delivered to the USAF from LA to Enid, OK. Willie refused to accept the birds like they were scheduled to due to the prop problem. Give to the multi engine school ![]() We didn't have much trouble with the T-6 and students. When we finally got the T-28A at Willie (after they machined the crank) there were several wings bent which would have broken off and crashed if plastic. I like metal wings. I like wood ones! Bertie |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
James Robinson wrote in
: Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Big John wrote: Bertie I did some service testing at Edwards on the T-28A. Things found there. Bird had a bad 2P vibration in cockpit. Was caused by each of the big wide blades of prop blowing big chunk of air back on the original canopy which was much taller that the one ending up on bird. Felt like sitting inside a base drum. OK, you're going to have to tell me what 2P means... These are terms typically used in diagnosing engine vibration problems. 1P vibrations are those which are at the same frequency of the engine RPM. 2P vibrations are those which are at twice the frequency of the engine RPM. 1/2P vibrations are those which are at 1/2 the RPM of the engine. If you have 1P vibrations, you look at things like prop balance or that you have all the right size pistons in the engine. With 2P vibrations, you look at things like the effect of two bladed props, or anything that might be attached to the engine with 1:2 gearing. OK, got it. Thanks Bertie |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
We didn't have much trouble with the T-6 and students. When we finally got the T-28A at Willie (after they machined the crank) there were several wings bent which would have broken off and crashed if plastic. I like metal wings. I like wood ones! Bertie I once saw two Sumo wrestlers that I assume were hired by Bellanca, jumping up and down on the wing tips of a Viking at one of the show sites where I was performing. If I remember right, it was Bobby Bishop or Debbie Gary who was demonstrating the Viking at that time. VERY impressive....and a very strong airplane! -- Dudley Henriques |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Big John wrote in
: Bertie 2P is twice propeller speed. With two blades it means each blade caused one of the vibrations points each revolution. The T-28B (Navy) version had a 1425 HP Wright R-1820. They must have added some strength to wing for big engine? I never saw what mods they did to 'A' version to make the 'B' ?????? The AF also modified some A's for VN with the R-1820 (think they were called T-28D's???) Long time ago in a far away land ![]() OK, I flew a DC 3 with the 1820 (the rest had Pratts) and I'm pretty sure it was about 1100HP in that incarnation. I'll look it up now, but the T-28 is HUGE! The 1340 in the T-6 was rated at 600HP so I would have thought pound for pound they would have had to go a lot more than an extra 33% for it. Bertie |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dudley Henriques wrote in
: Bertie the Bunyip wrote: We didn't have much trouble with the T-6 and students. When we finally got the T-28A at Willie (after they machined the crank) there were several wings bent which would have broken off and crashed if plastic. I like metal wings. I like wood ones! Bertie I once saw two Sumo wrestlers that I assume were hired by Bellanca, jumping up and down on the wing tips of a Viking at one of the show sites where I was performing. If I remember right, it was Bobby Bishop or Debbie Gary who was demonstrating the Viking at that time. VERY impressive....and a very strong airplane! Yes, lovely airplane, though someone did pull one apart doing aerobatics as I recall. It was someone who had a reputation for knowing what he was doing, too, not someone who just decided to roll one one day. I always thought the little LeBlond powered Junior would be a nice little thing to have, or even the later Crusairs. Such a pretty airplane.. Bertie |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Dudley Henriques wrote in : Bertie the Bunyip wrote: We didn't have much trouble with the T-6 and students. When we finally got the T-28A at Willie (after they machined the crank) there were several wings bent which would have broken off and crashed if plastic. I like metal wings. I like wood ones! Bertie I once saw two Sumo wrestlers that I assume were hired by Bellanca, jumping up and down on the wing tips of a Viking at one of the show sites where I was performing. If I remember right, it was Bobby Bishop or Debbie Gary who was demonstrating the Viking at that time. VERY impressive....and a very strong airplane! Yes, lovely airplane, though someone did pull one apart doing aerobatics as I recall. It was someone who had a reputation for knowing what he was doing, too, not someone who just decided to roll one one day. I always thought the little LeBlond powered Junior would be a nice little thing to have, or even the later Crusairs. Such a pretty airplane.. Bertie I've flown the old Cruisair. Real nice airplane and I always thought ahead of it's time. -- Dudley Henriques |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dudley Henriques wrote in
: Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Dudley Henriques wrote in : Bertie the Bunyip wrote: We didn't have much trouble with the T-6 and students. When we finally got the T-28A at Willie (after they machined the crank) there were several wings bent which would have broken off and crashed if plastic. I like metal wings. I like wood ones! Bertie I once saw two Sumo wrestlers that I assume were hired by Bellanca, jumping up and down on the wing tips of a Viking at one of the show sites where I was performing. If I remember right, it was Bobby Bishop or Debbie Gary who was demonstrating the Viking at that time. VERY impressive....and a very strong airplane! Yes, lovely airplane, though someone did pull one apart doing aerobatics as I recall. It was someone who had a reputation for knowing what he was doing, too, not someone who just decided to roll one one day. I always thought the little LeBlond powered Junior would be a nice little thing to have, or even the later Crusairs. Such a pretty airplane.. Bertie I've flown the old Cruisair. Real nice airplane and I always thought ahead of it's time. well, when you look at the competition, no contest. Same engine as a 108-1 and a good thirty knots faster. Also, that wing is so elegant looking I just now it has to do exactly what you ask with two finger control. I've seen a lot of them for sale recently for very small money, but I#ve already got too many toys! Bertie |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 11:01:14 -0600, "Gig 601XL Builder"
wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net wrote: Steven P. McNicoll wrote: I think most people would agree with you. I'd say a "trans- continental" flight that started in Spokane and proceeded east failed to transit about 400 miles worth of continent. Would you count KSEA to KJFK as Trans-continental? If so the difference in the distance of a great circle route flight would only be 193 miles. That 192 miles includes a major mountain range (the Cascades).... Ron Wanttaja |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Dudley Henriques wrote in : Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Dudley Henriques wrote in : Bertie the Bunyip wrote: We didn't have much trouble with the T-6 and students. When we finally got the T-28A at Willie (after they machined the crank) there were several wings bent which would have broken off and crashed if plastic. I like metal wings. I like wood ones! Bertie I once saw two Sumo wrestlers that I assume were hired by Bellanca, jumping up and down on the wing tips of a Viking at one of the show sites where I was performing. If I remember right, it was Bobby Bishop or Debbie Gary who was demonstrating the Viking at that time. VERY impressive....and a very strong airplane! Yes, lovely airplane, though someone did pull one apart doing aerobatics as I recall. It was someone who had a reputation for knowing what he was doing, too, not someone who just decided to roll one one day. I always thought the little LeBlond powered Junior would be a nice little thing to have, or even the later Crusairs. Such a pretty airplane.. Bertie I've flown the old Cruisair. Real nice airplane and I always thought ahead of it's time. well, when you look at the competition, no contest. Same engine as a 108-1 and a good thirty knots faster. Also, that wing is so elegant looking I just now it has to do exactly what you ask with two finger control. I've seen a lot of them for sale recently for very small money, but I#ve already got too many toys! Bertie It is indeed a beautiful wing. Getting the gear up could earn you a sore shoulder once in a while (The Grumman F4F Wildcat took some work to get the gear up and stowed as well) but aside from that, both were beautiful to fly. -- Dudley Henriques |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dudley Henriques wrote in
: Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Dudley Henriques wrote in : Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Dudley Henriques wrote in : Bertie the Bunyip wrote: We didn't have much trouble with the T-6 and students. When we finally got the T-28A at Willie (after they machined the crank) there were several wings bent which would have broken off and crashed if plastic. I like metal wings. I like wood ones! Bertie I once saw two Sumo wrestlers that I assume were hired by Bellanca, jumping up and down on the wing tips of a Viking at one of the show sites where I was performing. If I remember right, it was Bobby Bishop or Debbie Gary who was demonstrating the Viking at that time. VERY impressive....and a very strong airplane! Yes, lovely airplane, though someone did pull one apart doing aerobatics as I recall. It was someone who had a reputation for knowing what he was doing, too, not someone who just decided to roll one one day. I always thought the little LeBlond powered Junior would be a nice little thing to have, or even the later Crusairs. Such a pretty airplane.. Bertie I've flown the old Cruisair. Real nice airplane and I always thought ahead of it's time. well, when you look at the competition, no contest. Same engine as a 108-1 and a good thirty knots faster. Also, that wing is so elegant looking I just now it has to do exactly what you ask with two finger control. I've seen a lot of them for sale recently for very small money, but I#ve already got too many toys! Bertie It is indeed a beautiful wing. Getting the gear up could earn you a sore shoulder once in a while (The Grumman F4F Wildcat took some work to get the gear up and stowed as well) but aside from that, both were beautiful to fly. Mmm, I can see the F4F would be nice to fly allright. wouldn't have thought it would be too good to do a routine in, though. I don't know what type ailerons it had or how they were rigged but nothing about it screams out sportscar to me. Maybe it's just it's pugnacious looks. Cae to set me straight? Bertie |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
High wings and structural strength | Mxsmanic | Piloting | 21 | November 23rd 06 11:54 PM |
Looking for a DER/Structural | mhorowit | Home Built | 3 | June 25th 06 04:33 AM |
structural adhesive | circio0 | Home Built | 5 | May 30th 06 09:34 AM |
Any Lockheed Structural Repair Manuals out there? | Robert Murray | Restoration | 3 | December 2nd 04 05:59 AM |
Structural adhesive question | BD5ER | Home Built | 1 | August 3rd 03 06:03 AM |