![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dylan Smith wrote:
On 2009-04-30, Ross wrote: What was the cost of the A36 if I may ask and what did you usually fly at 90kts? Since it belonged to the instructor's brother-in-law, fortunately only the cost of the fuel! (It burns 13.8 gph in cruise, at 170 knots. It has GAMIjectors too which allows LOP operation. A fantastic plane...if only I could afford one :-)) My usual mount is an Auster Autocrat built in late 1945. (It looks very similar to the Taylorcraft BC-12, except it has flaps and the windows are different - that's because the Austers from that period are British built Taylorcrafts! However, instead of the Continental A-65 that you'd expect to find in a BC-12, it has a 160 hp Lycoming O-320 which makes it climb *rather better* and turns it into a really good aircraft for short airfields and towing gliders. But not cruise an awful lot faster without turning a lot of avgas into noise). Thanks for responding to a personal question. I have two friends that have A36s and with GAMIjectors. Really nice aircraft. I had a 65 Skyhawk with a 180 hp engine upgrade and C/S prop. It really was a nice aircraft and would it climb. But more horse power does not translate into more speed, completely. -- Regards, Ross C-172F 180HP Sold ![]() KSWI |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Dallas wrote: What's the bi-annual flight review all about? I haven't been through one yet.. how tough are they? Is this like a mini-practical test with stalls, engine outs and a tough verbal exam etc.. or is it more like an informal "Can he still fly an airplane and still understands the basics?" I just had my first one about two weeks ago and figured I'd chime in. Mine was a glider BFR, of course, so not quite the same. But perhaps it'll still be useful to some. We did the flight portion first. First flight was 15 minutes long. I expected a forced takeoff abort which never came. We then boxed the wake (a maneuver done on tow to demonstrate control and precision in that phase of flight) and various other easy maneuvers. I tried to thermal but it was too early in the day, so we were back down pretty soon. Next flight was a bit later, and we decided to try to stretch it to cover the full hour. (Glider BFR is one hour of flight time *or* 3 flights, to make it reasonable on days where you can't stay up.) This time the thermals were working, and we stayed up for an hour before deciding to bring it back home for others to use. The instructor had me do lots of good thermalling exercises, like flying at various levels of bank, approaching a stall in the thermal, adjusting my circle, etc. For other flight maneuvers, we did stalls, spin entries (silly trainer won't actually spin, but what can you do), lazy eights, and finished up with a covered altimeter landing. (That last part was fun. I've carefully cultivated my no-altimeter landing skills over the past couple of years. He offered to tell me what our altitude was verbally at any time. I never did ask outright, but I did confirm a couple of times. "We're at about 1900ft, right?" "1950...." Always within 50 feet. I was pleased.) The ground portion was interesting. We went over various airspace rules, like cloud clearances in the various classes of airspace, what you need to go there, etc. Not particularly useful in a glider but that also means it's easily forgotten, and that is one of the mandatory subjects. We also went over things like currency requirements, equipment requirements, and various other things along those lines. The environment was friendly and educational. The instructor asked questions, but it was not like an exam. If I stumbled or didn't know, he simply explained it. He also had me pick up a book called "Safer Soaring", and gave me some other documents to read as well, which was all very interesting and useful. All in all, it was a good experience. Nothing to be afraid of, unless your skills or knowledge are poor and you have no desire to improve them. I would rather have been flying my own plane and having fun, given the choice, but that's true of virtually every other activity I do as well. ![]() -- Mike Ash Radio Free Earth Broadcasting from our climate-controlled studios deep inside the Moon |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Post Annual Flight check - Video | A Lieberma[_2_] | Owning | 3 | January 23rd 09 03:34 PM |
Post Annual Flight check - Video | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 2 | January 18th 09 01:30 AM |
Post-Annual Flight | Jay Honeck[_2_] | Piloting | 114 | March 2nd 08 10:55 PM |
Post-Annual Flight | Jay Honeck[_2_] | Owning | 111 | March 2nd 08 10:55 PM |
Preflieght for first flight after annual | Michael 182 | Piloting | 15 | June 18th 05 04:12 PM |