If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#541
|
|||
|
|||
See this is where I have a problem. People who claim to not be religious
celebrate holidays such as Christmas, Easter, and yes Thanksgiving. Oh, come on. On the one hand you say that these holidays pre-date their current religious overtones, in some cases by thousands of years. Then, in the next breath, you wonder why the religions allow their members to celebrate them. Well, it's pretty obvious to me -- people LIKE to celebrate. Even the harshest religion probably learned long ago that you tamper with people's traditional holidays at your own peril. Christmas is a good example. Jesus' birthday was almost certainly NOT in December -- but there was a pagan Winter Solstice holiday that needed to be co-opted. Bingo! -- just add Jesus! It's also eminently practical to add a celebration at the deepest, darkest, coldest time of year. Most humans are naturally in a funk -- some seriously -- at this time of years, and need a "pick-me-up" to get through the long winter. Christmas and New Years Eve fit the bill perfectly. Halloween is an even better example. Even the Catholic church knows not to screw with a pagan holiday that allows little kids to get free candy! You think their ranks are dwindling NOW -- just watch what happens to them if they try to take away free candy! ;-) Religions must be pragmatic to a certain degree or they will cease to exist -- and their leaders know it. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#542
|
|||
|
|||
"Matthew P. Cummings" wrote in message news On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 21:45:58 +0000, Peter Gottlieb wrote: I think this thread has played itself out. Have a happy Thanksgiving everyone! See this is where I have a problem. People who claim to not be religious celebrate holidays such as Christmas, Easter, and yes Thanksgiving. Just as an earlier poster said he would spend money with religious symbols, I will certainly take a day off for whatever reason. I think in the interest of fairness we need at least a holiday a month from each of the categories (Christian, Islam, Judisim, Agnostic, Athiestism, Satanism, Buddism, Beerism, Lazyism, anything else). Earl G. |
#543
|
|||
|
|||
Brian,
and that most of the rest of the western world is significantly less religious that the USA. Didn't someone quote research in this thread that the US is the most religious country in the world? Wonder how to measure that... shrug In any case, it was an interesting thread. I think so, too. Of course, many (including myself) expressed their views in an extreme way for the benefit of the discussion (I like to think, at least). But it was/is a very interesting thread, I think. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#544
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 09:00:52 +0100, Thomas Borchert
wrote: Didn't someone quote research in this thread that the US is the most religious country in the world? Wonder how to measure that... I don't think you can. Noone seems to have a good definition of "religious". shrug In any case, it was an interesting thread. I think so, too. Of course, many (including myself) expressed their views in an extreme way for the benefit of the discussion (I like to think, at least). But it was/is a very interesting thread, I think. Agreed. Rob |
#545
|
|||
|
|||
In article , Rob Perkins
writes: Your ideas are thought-provoking; I was thinking specifically of the suiciders who come out of Palestine. As with many things, I could be wrong, but I don't think there's much of a middle class left there. The one of the recent suicide bombers in Israel was a successful pharmacist who had delayed his martydom until he had set aside enough to raise and educate his children. -- Wm. Donald (Don) Tabor Jr., DDS PP-ASEL Chesapeake, VA - CPK, PVG |
#546
|
|||
|
|||
In article k.net, L Smith
writes: Aside from which, I could forge a license just as easily as as I could forge a certificate of insurance. No one checks validity except the dental insurance companies you contract with. They verify it with the carrier. I'm sorry, but this looks like your trying to make a circular argument. It sounds like your saying that the only people that check for your license are the insurance companies, and they only check with themselves. Perhaps I was unclear. Dental insurance companies are not the same companies that sell dental professional liability insurance. The dental insurance companies who enter into managed care agreements like PPO plans wish to avoid secondary liability, so they require dentist who contract with them to be insured for liability, and verify that coverage with the liability insurers. Aside from which, if licensing were eliminated, it would be to my advantage to have proof of insurance on display and easily verified, just like home repair companies include the fact that they are bonded in their advertising. There just really isn't anything accomplished *for the public good* by licensing that the private sector cannot do better. Licensing only serves to restrain trade by preventing dentists from moving from one state to another to follow demand. Florida is famous for that in the profession, getting a Florida license is almost impossible if you are not from there. The Florida dentists fear an influx of semi-retired older dentists coming to the state and flooding the market, lowering fees. The result is that dentistry in FLorida is far more expensive than unrestrained supply and demand would dictate. (Same thing for Texas and Hawaii) -- Wm. Donald (Don) Tabor Jr., DDS PP-ASEL Chesapeake, VA - CPK, PVG |
#547
|
|||
|
|||
Noone seems to have a good definition of "religious". Basing one's life (the little decisions as well as the big one) on fundamental precepts which are by nature unprovable and undisprovable, and holding forth that these precepts represent TRUTH (and any competing precepts represent evil, or at least folly) Jose -- (for Email, make the obvious changes in my address) |
#548
|
|||
|
|||
There just really isn't anything accomplished *for the public good* by licensing that the private sector cannot do better. To the presmise that the insurance companies evaluate risk better than the licensing agencies and the public, how do you account for the fact that to insure a club with a twin costs upwards of five times as much as a club that has only single engine airplanes that fly IFR at night with one pilot. Seems somebody hasn't a clue, and I'm not sure which it is. Jose -- (for Email, make the obvious changes in my address) |
#549
|
|||
|
|||
And a Happy Thanksgiving to you, too, Jay.
H. N502TB "Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:Hqrxb.128107$Dw6.561599@attbi_s02... I guess I should cancel my plans to deliver Thanksgiving dinner to the needy tomorrow. Since it's on behalf of my church. I guess you better. After all, according to the atheists here, if your motivation is religious, you must not be moral. Jeez, I turn my attention away from this thread for a day or two, and look what happens! Talk about bitter dissension! I am thankful that there are those who deliver dinner to the needy -- whatever their motivation. If your religion commands you to help the hungry, house the homeless, and generally help humanity, I certainly will not argue with you. In fact, I thank you. However, I believe some posters have been trying to state the obvious, which is: Religion is a powerful force for both good and evil. Gullible people can be misled easily with the whole "fear of eternal damnation" threat. And it works the other way, too! Just look how many fools have been recruited by the fundamentalist, radical "Islamo-Fascists" in the Middle East! These dupes are lured into doing the ultimate evil, simply by having "eternity in paradise" promised to them. How many more children and innocents must be blown to smithereens so that this sick, parasitic version of Islam can flourish? Does anyone honestly think there would be suicide attacks WITHOUT religion assuring them of "eternal life"? THAT is the evil side of religion, ladies and gentlemen -- and it must be addressed in any serious discussion of religion. Anyhow, I only meant to comment on the rudeness of the religious zealots Mary and I ran into, and on the interesting way in which they were apparently able to self-justify their bizarre, unseemly behavior. I did not mean for this thread to pick on any particular religion, as these guys could just have easily have been Muslims, Hare Krishnas, or Believers in the Force. It's sad that this thread -- probably the longest I've ever seen -- ended up the way it did. I guess pilots are no different than the rest of the world in this regard... Happy Thanksgiving, everyone! -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#550
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Dover short pilots since vaccine order | Roman Bystrianyk | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 29th 04 12:47 AM |
[OT] USA - TSA Obstructing Armed Pilots? | No Spam! | Military Aviation | 120 | January 27th 04 10:19 AM |
[OT] USA - TSA Obstructing Armed Pilots? | No Spam! | General Aviation | 3 | December 23rd 03 08:53 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |