![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Travis Marlatte" wrote in message ink.net... If, after having said "remain clear" the controller comes back with "Cessna 1234, where did you want to go?" that is an implicit clearance to enter the class C. No, it is not. I don't know where you got that idea but it is simply not correct. There is nothing in "Cessna 1234, where did you want to go?" that implies authorization to enter Class C airspace when previously told to remain clear. Controller's know the rules. If they don't want you in their airspace, they will ignore you or repeat the "remain clear" instruction. If the pilot acknowledged the first instruction to remain clear there's no need to repeat it. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
ink.net... "Travis Marlatte" wrote in message ink.net... If, after having said "remain clear" the controller comes back with "Cessna 1234, where did you want to go?" that is an implicit clearance to enter the class C. No, it is not. I don't know where you got that idea but it is simply not correct. There is nothing in "Cessna 1234, where did you want to go?" that implies authorization to enter Class C airspace when previously told to remain clear. It is correct. It is radio contact which is documented as permission to enter the class C. Controller's know the rules. If they don't want you in their airspace, they will ignore you or repeat the "remain clear" instruction. If the pilot acknowledged the first instruction to remain clear there's no need to repeat it. If the contoller wanted the pilot to remain clear, he would have simply ignored him. The fact that the controller took the time to establish radio contact - to ask a question or to provide information - is sufficient acknowledgment (according to the AIM) that the pilot may enter the class C. ----------------------------- Travis |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Travis Marlatte" wrote in message ink.net... It is correct. It is radio contact which is documented as permission to enter the class C. It is documented that radio contact and an instruction to remain clear of Class C airspace is not permission to enter the Class C. If the contoller wanted the pilot to remain clear, he would have simply ignored him. The fact that the controller took the time to establish radio contact - to ask a question or to provide information - is sufficient acknowledgment (according to the AIM) that the pilot may enter the class C. You need to review the AIM. The AIM states, "If workload or traffic conditions prevent immediate provision of Class C services, the controller will inform the pilot to remain outside the Class C airspace until conditions permit the services to be provided." |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mark" wrote in message
om... [...] Again, sorry to bust you like this. However I feel if you had the balls to write this obvious lack of judgement in your flying skill, then you open yourself up to my wrath. Your "wrath"? LOL! That's all the wrath you've got? I've seen mice with more wrath. In any case, it should be clear enough to you from the direction the thread's taken that the issue isn't quite as clear, cut, and dried as you think it is. Perhaps you failed to notice that the original "remain clear" instruction was given by a different controller, while the airplane was still on the ground? Pete |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Peter Duniho" wrote in message ...
"Mark" wrote in message om... [...] Again, sorry to bust you like this. However I feel if you had the balls to write this obvious lack of judgement in your flying skill, then you open yourself up to my wrath. Your "wrath"? LOL! That's all the wrath you've got? I've seen mice with more wrath. In any case, it should be clear enough to you from the direction the thread's taken that the issue isn't quite as clear, cut, and dried as you think it is. Perhaps you failed to notice that the original "remain clear" instruction was given by a different controller, while the airplane was still on the ground? Pete Pete: I was trying to be a little nice, but I guess you expected more? It's nice to have a NG forum to debate these issues AFTER the fact, however in the cockpit you don't have the luxery of debating the issue and looking up every nuance in the FAR's. The pilot was told "after departure remain clear of the class C airspace". Then "After departure" he was call with some trivial info and then "I turned and headed directly toward my destination, taking me across the class C to the surface airspace.". If a different controller told him to cross into class C, then it's legal to ENTER class C. However I simple call by this pilot with the phrase "Can I enter Class Charlie?" would have done wonders to clear things up between the pilot and the new controller. I teach students that yes, you follow the FAR's. However when in doubt or confused, TALK TO THE CONTROLLER AND CLEAR IT UP! You have a brain, use it. There has been many accidents where lack of communication was the cause. Most students want to act professional and DON'T ask questions on the radio. However MORE private pilots THINK since they have a license they don't NEED to ask questions. This problem is compounded when flying with a fellow pilot, they don't want to look stupid in front of a peer. I have more respect for a pilot that will put their ego aside and ask a question over one that pretends they are Mr. Right Stuff. All this debate BS above is nice for the day after. However you need to remember to teach the proper responce when you don't have the luxery of time to think a problem through. Aviate, Navigate and Communicate. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mark" wrote in message
om... Pete: I was trying to be a little nice, but I guess you expected more? It's nice to have a NG forum to debate these issues AFTER the fact, however in the cockpit you don't have the luxery of debating the issue and looking up every nuance in the FAR's. The pilot was told "after departure remain clear of the class C airspace". Then "After departure" he was call with some trivial info and then "I turned and headed directly toward my destination, taking me across the class C to the surface airspace.". If a different controller told him to cross into class C, then it's legal to ENTER class C. However I simple call by this pilot with the phrase "Can I enter Class Charlie?" would have done wonders to clear things up between the pilot and the new controller. I teach students that yes, you follow the FAR's. However when in doubt or confused, TALK TO THE CONTROLLER AND CLEAR IT UP! You have a brain, use it. There has been many accidents where lack of communication was the cause. Most students want to act professional and DON'T ask questions on the radio. However MORE private pilots THINK since they have a license they don't NEED to ask questions. This problem is compounded when flying with a fellow pilot, they don't want to look stupid in front of a peer. I have more respect for a pilot that will put their ego aside and ask a question over one that pretends they are Mr. Right Stuff. All this debate BS above is nice for the day after. However you need to remember to teach the proper responce when you don't have the luxery of time to think a problem through. Aviate, Navigate and Communicate. I take it that your capitals are directed at those of us continuing the debate beyond its useful life. Otherwise, I pitty your poor students. You are correct that, when unsure, we should not be affraid to ask for clarification. In this case, the flying pilot wasn't unsure. He did what he thought was permissible. He had no reason to ask for clarification from the controller. If the non-flying pilot thought it was wrong, he should have said so. Maybe the CRM wasn't what it should be. Maybe it didn't occur to him until he was on the ground. For whatever reason, the non-flying pilot must not have been sure enough of himself to question it in the air. He was right to voice it at some time, for his own education. I happen to believe that the pilot was correct, did not need to ask for permission and was free to enter the class C. But, thanks to all this debate BS, I at least now know that it may not be clear cut. The next time I talk to the controllers at my home base, I'll ask them. ------------------------------- Travis |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Travis Marlatte" wrote in message link.net...
I take it that your capitals are directed at those of us continuing the debate beyond its useful life. Otherwise, I pitty your poor students. When instructing I usually end a comment like that with a Howard Dean "AAARRRRGGGGHHHHHHH". |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Travis Marlatte" wrote in message ink.net... I happen to believe that the pilot was correct, did not need to ask for permission and was free to enter the class C. You've made it very clear that is what you believe, what you haven't explained is why you believe it. But, thanks to all this debate BS, I at least now know that it may not be clear cut. The next time I talk to the controllers at my home base, I'll ask them. What makes you think they'd know anything about it? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Duniho" wrote in message ... In any case, it should be clear enough to you from the direction the thread's taken that the issue isn't quite as clear, cut, and dried as you think it is. Actually, the issue is cut and dried. From the direction this thread's taken it's clear that some pilots have a poor understanding of regulations and procedures with regard to Class C airspace. Perhaps you failed to notice that the original "remain clear" instruction was given by a different controller, while the airplane was still on the ground? Nothing in the original message indicates the original "remain clear" instruction was given by a different controller, and it wouldn't matter if it had. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Mountain flying instruction: McCall, Idaho, Colorado too! | [email protected] | General Aviation | 0 | March 26th 04 11:24 PM |
Windshields - tint or clear? | Roger Long | Piloting | 7 | February 10th 04 02:41 AM |
Is a BFR instruction? | Roger Long | Piloting | 11 | December 11th 03 09:58 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |