If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
To Pawnee or not to Pawnee...that is the question...
A couple of links about towing with Rotax power. First the microlight
in SA: http://www.glidingmagazine.com/FeatureArticle.asp?id=91 And also on using Rotax Falkes: http://www.glidingmagazine.com/Featu...cle.asp?id=117 I bet a fair few Falkes are being used as tugs in Germany - any of our members from over there know? Dan |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
To Pawnee or not to Pawnee...that is the question...
I bet a fair few Falkes are being used as tugs in Germany - any of our
members from over there know? Bleurgh, it would help if I RTFA I linked to. At least 20 are used for towing over there, and that was in 2001. A good point made in the article is also that, of course, a motorglider tug still gets used for circuit training, field landing exercises etc., and all that ups utilisation and lowers costs. And it is damned quiet - ours is *much* quieter than our Pawnee. Dan |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
To Pawnee or not to Pawnee...that is the question...
About as many as Scheibe elected to build...
Scheibe has recently gone through ownership change, and hopefully will get more focussed on building gliders. Frank Whiteley wrote: On Oct 22, 6:07 am, Dan G wrote: On Oct 22, 9:27 am, Dan G wrote: In fact we even tried towing with a Rotax Falke - only 100hp or so, but very efficient. "As a tug, the SF25C Rotax Falke seems to perform very well, climbing with heavy two-seaters at 400ft/min. This is marginally slower than, say, a Robin DR400, but this Falke uses only half as much fuel and the noise pollution is much less. In Germany, official analysis of comparative tug noise estimates a single tow in a Robin DR400 type tug equates to 4.8 tows in a SF25C Rotax Falke. Glider-tug speed compatibility, similar wing loadings and aspect ratios, and reduced wake turbulence, mean the motorglider aerotowing option offers significant safety features. The manufacturer's fuel consumption figures are 16-18 litres (c 3.5 gallons) an hour, hardly thirsty for tugs. Taking into account all the costs of operating the Falke, including an engine rebuild every 2,000 hours, insurance, fuel and maintenance costs, a Falke is estimated by its makers to tow at about 60 per cent of the cost of today's conventional tugs." http://www.fffoundation.co.uk/SGart.html That article was published in 2000. How many are currently in use as tugs? |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
To Pawnee or not to Pawnee...that is the question...
Dan G wrote:
I bet a fair few Falkes are being used as tugs in Germany - any of our members from over there know? Bleurgh, it would help if I RTFA I linked to. At least 20 are used for towing over there, and that was in 2001. A good point made in the article is also that, of course, a motorglider tug still gets used for circuit training, field landing exercises etc., and all that ups utilisation and lowers costs. And it is damned quiet - ours is *much* quieter than our Pawnee. I think you'll also find that a number of German operations are using modern glass ultralights as tugs. IIRC the Wasserkuppe uses a Virus or similar - a nose gear gear high-wing anyway - for towing single seaters and a GR400 for their ASK-21s. -- martin@ | Martin Gregorie gregorie. | Essex, UK org | |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
To Pawnee or not to Pawnee...that is the question...
On Monday, October 15, 2007 7:16:11 PM UTC-4, Travis Beach wrote:
Our club has a Piper Pawnee 235hp in excellent condition. We just spent $35000 five years ago to completely overhaul her...new fabric, new engine, anything that needed to be replaced was... Heres the rub...we are in the middle of a new two place acquisition with the club making a decision about getting a new two place intermediate performance. We were about to drop the hammer when a very vocal minority raised the issue of PAWNEE needing to be replaced citing extreme maintenance cost (???) and inability to get parts. He/She cited the local aero repair facility as his/her source of information...Many of us just dont see this as a problem. The replacement that was cited was a Husky 180HP...I just dont see the reasoning of such a switch...I surely would rather two a heavier two place with a proven performer with 235 hp vs a 180... What say you? Discuss...should we scrap the Pawnee in favor of a Husky? Beach must be single place glass your towing with the scout and husky, no comparison between the 2 and a 235-260 pawnee, not safe hauling our ask21 loaded with anything but the pawnee, my old club had pawnees and a scout and the scout was seldom used, not enough HP, and we only towed the light gliders with it, you just can't replace horse power. |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
To Pawnee or not to Pawnee...that is the question...
All this talk of horsepower ... I've never towed with anything other than a 150hp Super Cub and a 150hp Citabria and they got the job done from 1500' altitude fields off 2500' grass strips, even with two place glass. I've enjoyed being towed by Pawnees but as others have noted, the only real difference from the quiet end of the rope was the initial ground roll. More horses are nice but not really necessary at low altitude ... in fact they used to tow at one of my clubs with a Tiger Moth!
|
#57
|
|||
|
|||
To Pawnee or not to Pawnee...that is the question...
On Sunday, March 23, 2014 2:31:52 AM UTC-7, wrote:
All this talk of horsepower ... I've never towed with anything other than a 150hp Super Cub and a 150hp Citabria and they got the job done from 1500' altitude fields off 2500' grass strips, even with two place glass. I've enjoyed being towed by Pawnees but as others have noted, the only real difference from the quiet end of the rope was the initial ground roll. More horses are nice but not really necessary at low altitude ... in fact they used to tow at one of my clubs with a Tiger Moth! This thread is from 2007, so I suspect they made a decision . . . unless they're really slow. Up high, Minden is at 4730' and high desert, there's no comparison. I own a 180 HP Husky with PowerFlow exhaust and cooling improvements. I've towed heavy two place glass and it's doable, just barely. And not at all kind to the Husky with CHTs over 400 F and climb sub 200 fpm. Pawnee, no problem. Haven't towed near sea level, but of course have taken my Husky there - - totally different animal! The roughly 3% change in horsepower per thousand feet makes a remarkable difference when you're used to mostly flying mountains. bumper |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Towing with a 150 hp Pawnee? | [email protected] | Soaring | 5 | November 22nd 06 01:32 PM |
PA-25 PAWNEE | Rafgsa Centre | Soaring | 2 | March 3rd 05 03:13 AM |
WTB Pawnee Prop | Roy Bourgeois | Soaring | 1 | November 2nd 04 06:57 PM |
Pawnee | Damien Dyer | Soaring | 2 | November 2nd 04 05:35 PM |
Pawnee hell | Stewart Kissel | Soaring | 17 | October 27th 04 04:15 AM |