Tire inflation pressure

Pricks are people like Barnyard BOb and
Warran Whunicut who launch into vindictive personal attacks.

- anon
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Vindictive personal attacks?
IMO, you have some very serious mental issues
to resolve before you take me on., anon. This all began
with your PSYCHOTIC fear of being sued for stating
anything publicly here in RAH under your real name.
For me to pass up an opportunity to tickle your underbelly
was and continues to be... too much to resist.

My initial remark to you was....

Don't be such a tight ass, anon.

For that you rewarded me with....

Pot...kettle...black.

If this is your notion of a vindictive personal attack,
You ainl't seen nothin' yet, wounded cowardly one.

Get lost or get help.


Barnyard BOb --

Shucks... All this because I asked how much air to put in tires!

*Barnyard BOb* wrote in message . ..
Pricks are people like Barnyard BOb and
Warran Whunicut who launch into vindictive personal attacks.

- anon
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Vindictive personal attacks?
IMO, you have some very serious mental issues
to resolve before you take me on., anon. This all began
with your PSYCHOTIC fear of being sued for stating
anything publicly here in RAH under your real name.
For me to pass up an opportunity to tickle your underbelly
was and continues to be... too much to resist.

My initial remark to you was....

Don't be such a tight ass, anon.

For that you rewarded me with....

Pot...kettle...black.

If this is your notion of a vindictive personal attack,
You ainl't seen nothin' yet, wounded cowardly one.

Get lost or get help.


Barnyard BOb --

Now I have an equally low opinion of Warran Whunicut.

- anon

Your opinions have no validity, you vain, pompous prick.

Warren
You have obviously mistaken me for someone who gives a **** for what you think.

*Barnyard BOb* wrote:

My initial remark to you was....

Don't be such a tight ass, anon.

For that you rewarded me with....

Pot...kettle...black.

Yes, pot...kettle...black. An accurate assessment if ever there was
one. Obviously, my remarks are weighing quite heavily upon you. So
much so, in fact, that you post an initial knee-jerk reaction and
then, after hours of more thought, you send another love note. How
amusing, how telling. Don't try to justify your mean-spirited antics
further, they are beyond justification.

- Anon

Don't try to justify your mean-spirited antics
further, they are beyond justification.

- Anon
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

I repeat...

IMO, you have some very serious mental issues
to resolve before you take me on., anon. This all began
with your PSYCHOTIC fear of being sued for stating
anything publicly here in RAH under your real name.
For me to pass up an opportunity to tickle your underbelly
was and continues to be... too much to resist.

And I repeat and agree with what Warren stated...

"Your opinions have no validity, you vain, pompous prick.
You have obviously mistaken me for someone who gives a **** for what
you think.." - Warren


Barnyard BOb --

wrote in message ...
In article , *Barnyard BOb*
says...


Don't try to justify your mean-spirited antics
further, they are beyond justification.

- Anon
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

I repeat...

IMO, you have some very serious mental issues
to resolve before you take me on., anon. This all began
with your PSYCHOTIC fear of being sued for stating
anything publicly here in RAH under your real name.
For me to pass up an opportunity to tickle your underbelly
was and continues to be... too much to resist.

Since a number of people (15, IIRC) have been sued for publicly posting
things
on RAH under their own name, I think that anon's fear is anything but
psychotic.
In fact, it's pretty reasonable.

Anonymity will insulate a poster from tort liability? Tell that to the
anonymous posters who libeled a Seattle businessman and his business.
Their ISP's gave them up in a heartbeat, especially after a judge ordered
them to.

Fact is the ISP becomes liable too, and there is authority to back it up,
when the ISP, after having been given notice, continues to serve as a
channel for the libel. But in the case of the Seattle businessman, the
ISP's were more than happy to turn over the identities of the culprits,
after terminating their accounts. Besides, the law provides in all cases
that the court can order a reluctant ISP to give up the name, address, and
other pertinent data of the offender so the sheriff knows where to go to
serve the summons and complaint and other legal process.

So much for your armchair barristering, triple-arse. As they say here in
NC, "Liyah, liyah, pants on fiyah."

And YOU like to PLAY with fiyah, don't you, boy?


I'd just prefer that people who want to post anonymously get a psudonym
[sic], or
"handle" - so you can tell them apart when they start talking to one
another.
If there's only one "anon" it's no problem, but what if there were 12?

On 10 Nov 2003 14:12:25 -0800, wrote:


Don't try to justify your mean-spirited antics
further, they are beyond justification.

- Anon
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

I repeat...

IMO, you have some very serious mental issues
to resolve before you take me on., anon. This all began
with your PSYCHOTIC fear of being sued for stating
anything publicly here in RAH under your real name.
For me to pass up an opportunity to tickle your underbelly
was and continues to be... too much to resist.

Since a number of people (15, IIRC) have been sued for publicly posting things
on RAH under their own name, I think that anon's fear is anything but psychotic.
In fact, it's pretty reasonable.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

NO.....
You then have an UNREASONABLE fear, too.

I personally know a goodly number of the 15...
and they are still using their names on the net.
Last I knew, neither Chuck nor Ron are hiding
under their RAH beds. Quite the opposite.

What happened to them is an aberration -
anything but the norm for the net, IMO.

AFAIK...
Anybody can be sued for anything here.
Matters not what name you use....
or what tires specifications you dare post.
The RISK is the SAME The fact that you
post anything, puts you at risk.

Now that the cat is out of the bag...
are you about to leave?

You do realize your chances of having an auto
accident are far greater than being involved in
a usenet suit. Are you about to quit driving under
your real name? Rather silly when put in proper
perspective, isn't it?


Barnyard BOb --

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:00:06 -0600, .Barnyard BOb. wrote:

I personally know a goodly number of the 15...
and they are still using their names on the net.
Last I knew, neither Chuck nor Ron are hiding
under their RAH beds.

I'm too large to fit under most beds. :-)

Ron "And the closet is too obvious a place to look" Wanttaja

In article , .Barnyard BOb. says...
You then have an UNREASONABLE fear, too.

I personally know a goodly number of the 15...
and they are still using their names on the net.
Last I knew, neither Chuck nor Ron are hiding
under their RAH beds. Quite the opposite.

What happened to them is an aberration -
anything but the norm for the net, IMO.

That's right Unka Bob I ain't scared a no lawsuit!!! Especially since the suer
was zoom and us suie's are for the most part still here. I'm not hiding since I
probably can't get under a bed to hide anymore.(those days are long gone).Did I
ever tell ya about the time this gals husband......

The Journeyman sueer or suer (one e or 2) zoom is still ranting about his
lawsuit with SnF. Believe it or not he says they are lying about attendance
figures.This is coming from a guy who "never" told the truth about "his"
circulation figures.

By the way I run 8-10 psi on Hawk nosewheels and 6-8 psi on the mains. I don't
know what it's worth except for our planes ...so sue me :-)

See ya

Nefoo Chuck RAH-15/1 ret ...and proud of it

You then have an UNREASONABLE fear, too.

I personally know a goodly number of the 15...
and they are still using their names on the net.
Last I knew, neither Chuck nor Ron are hiding
under their RAH beds. Quite the opposite.

What happened to them is an aberration -
anything but the norm for the net, IMO.

That's right Unka Bob I ain't scared a no lawsuit!!! Especially since the suer
was zoom and us suie's are for the most part still here. I'm not hiding since I
probably can't get under a bed to hide anymore.(those days are long gone).Did I
ever tell ya about the time this gals husband......

The Journeyman sueer or suer (one e or 2) zoom is still ranting about his
lawsuit with SnF. Believe it or not he says they are lying about attendance
figures.This is coming from a guy who "never" told the truth about "his"
circulation figures.

By the way I run 8-10 psi on Hawk nosewheels and 6-8 psi on the mains. I don't
know what it's worth except for our planes ...so sue me :-)

See ya

Nefoo Chuck RAH-15/1 ret ...and proud of it
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Thanks, Nefoo Chuck.

As usual, you and Ron respond with light hearted
mirth and merriment. Seems neither of you are losing
sleep over being sued using you real names any more
than I am. Some days ya just gotta get out of bed
and take a chance on 'intercoursing' via usenet.

It's strange that some here think absolutely nothing of
risking there arses in some pretty weird flying contraptions,
while others are totally petrified for anyone to know who
they are on the Net. Talk about screwed up priorities.

Go figure.

Cheerio,
Unka BOb -
1. 25 psi per RV3 tyre
2. 150 horsepower under the bonnet