If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
When are thermals not circular and do thermal helpers assume thatthey are?
Flew with updated SeeYou Mobile Thermal Assistant today - definitely better than the old one - reserving judgement on usefulness!
Mike |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
When are thermals not circular and do thermal helpers assume thatthey are?
On Tuesday, July 30, 2013 1:54:13 AM UTC+1, jfitch wrote:
Thermals may not be circular, but your glider flies in a pretty good approximation of a circle. So the cylindrical graph depicted in Winpilot is all the information you can really use. XCSoar's polar graph might fool you into thinking that is the shape of the lift - but it is a polar graph of strength around a fixed radius circle, not a map of the thermal. Oh yeah they are different! 'fixed radius circle' implies to me that XCSoar's assistant is trying to estimate the lift over a fixed area - eg a 250m wide circle. Just to clarify: XCSoar's thermal assistant is simply a 36-point plot of the lift recorded vs heading over the last turn. While your heading lies within a single 10 degree block, one of these points is continuously updated with your instantaneous vario value. When your heading crosses into the next 10 degree block, the next point is updated, and so on. In practical terms this means that any sections where you hold a constant heading are ignored on the plot. As an extreme example, imagine you're flying a racetrack pattern between two cores. You've turned the first 180 degrees in the first core and have just completed the remaining 180 degrees in the second core. The top half of the thermal assistant would show the lift encountered during your 180-degree turn in the first core, and the bottom half would show the result of your 180-degree turn in the second core. Any lift or sink you encountered on the straight leg between the first and second cores would not be represented on the plot. The line in the middle of the plot just points to the centre of the polygon.. |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
When are thermals not circular and do thermal helpers assume thatthey are?
On Saturday, August 10, 2013 6:57:04 AM UTC-7, wrote:
On Tuesday, July 30, 2013 1:54:13 AM UTC+1, jfitch wrote: Thermals may not be circular, but your glider flies in a pretty good approximation of a circle. So the cylindrical graph depicted in Winpilot is all the information you can really use. XCSoar's polar graph might fool you into thinking that is the shape of the lift - but it is a polar graph of strength around a fixed radius circle, not a map of the thermal. Oh yeah they are different! 'fixed radius circle' implies to me that XCSoar's assistant is trying to estimate the lift over a fixed area - eg a 250m wide circle. Just to clarify: XCSoar's thermal assistant is simply a 36-point plot of the lift recorded vs heading over the last turn. While your heading lies within a single 10 degree block, one of these points is continuously updated with your instantaneous vario value. When your heading crosses into the next 10 degree block, the next point is updated, and so on. In practical terms this means that any sections where you hold a constant heading are ignored on the plot. As an extreme example, imagine you're flying a racetrack pattern between two cores. You've turned the first 180 degrees in the first core and have just completed the remaining 180 degrees in the second core. The top half of the thermal assistant would show the lift encountered during your 180-degree turn in the first core, and the bottom half would show the result of your 180-degree turn in the second core. Any lift or sink you encountered on the straight leg between the first and second cores would not be represented on the plot. The line in the middle of the plot just points to the centre of the polygon. Thanks for clarifying my explanation, that is precisely how I thought it (and Winpilot) works. A graph of lift as a function of angular (heading) displacement. I do not understand the value of plotting lift strength vs. geographical position as is done by some programs. In the thermals I fly, the thermal is at least drifting with the local wind, and often not in an orderly way. The last circle's track has little predictive value for the next (they may be displaced by half a diameter or more) unless the last circle's track is drifted with the predicted wind - and that is not reliable near a rough western thermal. This does have some value in ridge or wave flying, but not in thermals. |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
When are thermals not circular and do thermal helpers assume that they are?
Your glider is drifting with the wind, too...
"jfitch" wrote in message ... On Saturday, August 10, 2013 6:57:04 AM UTC-7, wrote: On Tuesday, July 30, 2013 1:54:13 AM UTC+1, jfitch wrote: Thermals may not be circular, but your glider flies in a pretty good approximation of a circle. So the cylindrical graph depicted in Winpilot is all the information you can really use. XCSoar's polar graph might fool you into thinking that is the shape of the lift - but it is a polar graph of strength around a fixed radius circle, not a map of the thermal. Oh yeah they are different! 'fixed radius circle' implies to me that XCSoar's assistant is trying to estimate the lift over a fixed area - eg a 250m wide circle. Just to clarify: XCSoar's thermal assistant is simply a 36-point plot of the lift recorded vs heading over the last turn. While your heading lies within a single 10 degree block, one of these points is continuously updated with your instantaneous vario value. When your heading crosses into the next 10 degree block, the next point is updated, and so on. In practical terms this means that any sections where you hold a constant heading are ignored on the plot. As an extreme example, imagine you're flying a racetrack pattern between two cores. You've turned the first 180 degrees in the first core and have just completed the remaining 180 degrees in the second core. The top half of the thermal assistant would show the lift encountered during your 180-degree turn in the first core, and the bottom half would show the result of your 180-degree turn in the second core. Any lift or sink you encountered on the straight leg between the first and second cores would not be represented on the plot. The line in the middle of the plot just points to the centre of the polygon. Thanks for clarifying my explanation, that is precisely how I thought it (and Winpilot) works. A graph of lift as a function of angular (heading) displacement. I do not understand the value of plotting lift strength vs. geographical position as is done by some programs. In the thermals I fly, the thermal is at least drifting with the local wind, and often not in an orderly way. The last circle's track has little predictive value for the next (they may be displaced by half a diameter or more) unless the last circle's track is drifted with the predicted wind - and that is not reliable near a rough western thermal. This does have some value in ridge or wave flying, but not in thermals. |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
When are thermals not circular and do thermal helpers assume that they are?
I have been using XCSoar thermalling assistant in 8 club gliders.
As pointed out earlier, it works better when connected with a variometer. But it gives you some idea what is happening even with GPS only. My experience is, that the most important thing is to adjust timing of you corrections for each glider. It's easier now, when we have 3 or our gliders with same variometer/flarm systems. I was flying few days ago using the latest XCSoar test version. There was an interesting new feature - while circling, it is drawing an arc in front of the glider, predicting where your current bank and speed will bring you. It worked surprisingly well when I was using it on backseat of our Janus, with LG phone and without flight computer connection. The glider track was set to color the lifting areas yellowish, sinks blue(s), and I was using this new graphic tool to aim my course to the area of strongest lift. I also had the thermal assistant as an infobox, as well as the thermal gain graph. Since these systems tell you what has happened past 30 secs and where, they might give you some information you can use to make your corrections. Or to leave the thermal. Nothing more. XCSoar seems to have a feature that calculates the central point of the lift, but I have not found that useful. Maybe I have not got the right idea off how to utilize it. At 13:57 10 August 2013, wrote: On Tuesday, July 30, 2013 1:54:13 AM UTC+1, jfitch wrote: Thermals may not be circular, but your glider flies in a pretty good appr= oximation of a circle. So the cylindrical graph depicted in Winpilot is all= the information you can really use. XCSoar's polar graph might fool you in= to thinking that is the shape of the lift - but it is a polar graph of stre= ngth around a fixed radius circle, not a map of the thermal. Oh yeah they a= re different! 'fixed radius circle' implies to me that XCSoar's assistant is trying to es= timate the lift over a fixed area - eg a 250m wide circle. Just to clarify:= XCSoar's thermal assistant is simply a 36-point plot of the lift recorded = vs heading over the last turn. While your heading lies within a single 10 d= egree block, one of these points is continuously updated with your instanta= neous vario value. When your heading crosses into the next 10 degree block,= the next point is updated, and so on. In practical terms this means that any sections where you hold a constant h= eading are ignored on the plot. As an extreme example, imagine you're flyin= g a racetrack pattern between two cores. You've turned the first 180 degree= s in the first core and have just completed the remaining 180 degrees in th= e second core. The top half of the thermal assistant would show the lift en= countered during your 180-degree turn in the first core, and the bottom hal= f would show the result of your 180-degree turn in the second core. Any lif= t or sink you encountered on the straight leg between the first and second = cores would not be represented on the plot. The line in the middle of the plot just points to the centre of the polygon= .. |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
When are thermals not circular and do thermal helpers assume thatthey are?
On Saturday, August 10, 2013 8:43:05 AM UTC-7, Dan Marotta wrote:
Your glider is drifting with the wind, too... Unfortunately, the earth, and the GPS system that tracks with it, is not..... |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
When are thermals not circular and do thermal helpers assume that they are?
What are you trying to say. Seems to me that the airmass is carrying the
thermal along and the glider with it. With that premise, circling in calm air or in a wind makes no difference. I've thermalled straight up and with a 20+ kt drift down wind. I never had to hold heading into a wind to maintain center in a thermal. Or do I misunderstand what you're saying? If that's the case, please elaborate. "jfitch" wrote in message ... On Saturday, August 10, 2013 8:43:05 AM UTC-7, Dan Marotta wrote: Your glider is drifting with the wind, too... Unfortunately, the earth, and the GPS system that tracks with it, is not..... |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
When are thermals not circular and do thermal helpers assume thatthey are?
On Sunday, August 11, 2013 1:19:40 PM UTC-4, Dan Marotta wrote:
I never had to hold heading into a wind to maintain center in a thermal. Does it work like this east of Ohio? |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
When are thermals not circular and do thermal helpers assume thatthey are?
On Sunday, August 11, 2013 10:19:40 AM UTC-7, Dan Marotta wrote:
What are you trying to say. Seems to me that the airmass is carrying the thermal along and the glider with it. With that premise, circling in calm air or in a wind makes no difference. I've thermalled straight up and with a 20+ kt drift down wind. I never had to hold heading into a wind to maintain center in a thermal. Or do I misunderstand what you're saying? If that's the case, please elaborate. ... On Saturday, August 10, 2013 8:43:05 AM UTC-7, Dan Marotta wrote: Your glider is drifting with the wind, too... Unfortunately, the earth, and the GPS system that tracks with it, is not..... It makes a difference if you are trying to relate your thermaling track to a track projected to the ground. Some thermal assistants (like SYM) draw a track on the ground color coded by climb rate. If you are drifting with the wind, this track quickly drifts upwind relative to you and the airmass (which are drifting downwind). Therefore the next time around your circle, the track will not have much relevance. The only thing that matters (as you have said) is the glider relative to the airmass, which the GPS cannot accurately track and plot. That relationship has to be inertially derived, or simple inferred to be static. The GPS plot is relative to the earth, which can be thought of as moving underneath you at the speed of the wind. Such a plot is of little value when thermaling though they can be useful for ridge and wave, which are effectively anchored to the earth. There have been some attempts to guess the drift of the thermal from an assumed or calculated wind speed, but most thermals where I fly are not so well behaved. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Thermal Forcasting -Thermal index | gldrgidr | Soaring | 6 | November 27th 10 10:26 PM |
Manchester England (EGCC) Spey Engine (I assume) | Andrew B | Aviation Photos | 0 | October 9th 07 09:39 PM |
Circular runways for airports? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 15 | December 27th 06 12:24 AM |
Thermal Data Files Thermal Mapping Project Australia | Mal | Soaring | 0 | December 2nd 05 11:14 PM |
Circular Runway | jsmith | Piloting | 55 | April 11th 04 10:22 AM |