![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
LarSwan wrote:
I am a gliding fanatic, but I think that the most suitable air sport for the Olympic Games is parachuting. Robert While I've never flown one myself, I wonder if hanggliding/parasailing would make more Olympic friendly sport vs my beloved hardwinged soaring. Better TV close-ups of thinner competitors faces/bodies, more colorful equipment, more muscles used for control and landing, more percieved danger, more creative options for required preliminaries events and room for individual expression. And a downhill event. Noting the influx of retired hang gliding pilots into our form of soaring...the best way to promote soaring at the Olympics is to play our best card which may be our hanggliding brothers. The media already preferences their images over ours, go with it. Nice to imagine gliders in the Olympics, but I suspect you're right. Shawn |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
SNIP-
To promote our sport we need to be positive, and to exploit technology and creativity to present it to viewers as the exciting, challenging and adrenalin pumping sport that it is. SNIP Without sounding too snide, I would think submarine racers might say the same thing about there sport...and it could very well be true. But translating that to outsiders is a different issue. Face it, if most soaring pilots are not interested in watching sailplane races...I suspect the general TV viewing population might find it a tough sale. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
OK, maybe it isn't an olympic sport, but tossing toilet paper rolls
out of a glider and trying to hit a target seems like an excellent way to "exploit technology and creativity," and is certainly exciting and fun to watch. Of course, there are SOME cheaters, who soak it in water and freeze it right before throwing it out the window...NOT VERY SPORTING!!! But an excellent way to get the observers at the target excited... :PPPPPP Mark In article , Stewart Kissel wrote: SNIP- To promote our sport we need to be positive, and to exploit technology and creativity to present it to viewers as the exciting, challenging and adrenalin pumping sport that it is. SNIP Without sounding too snide, I would think submarine racers might say the same thing about there sport...and it could very well be true. But translating that to outsiders is a different issue. Face it, if most soaring pilots are not interested in watching sailplane races...I suspect the general TV viewing population might find it a tough sale. -- ------------+ Mark Boyd Avenal, California, USA |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() So why do we have to have a one design contest for the Olympics? Why not just make it a handicapped contest using the current fleet? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gary Boggs" wrote in message ... So why do we have to have a one design contest for the Olympics? That's exactly my point and it sounds like you and Eric at least agree Why not just make it a handicapped contest using the current fleet? Here we have a minor disagreement. Eric and I are saying that no handicapping is required. We (the sport of soaring) just define 15m as a monoclass and Standard as a monoclass. There, now we're ready. Olympics 2008 will include 2 sailplane racing classes - Standard and 15 Meter. Oops, forgot rules. Same as for the World's I suppose? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
But then we're back to having to have the latest (most expensive) design to
be competitive. I always thought that one of the reasons to have an Olympic contest was to test the pilots, not the plane or the pocket book. Having a handicapped contest would open it up to more than just those who could afford the latest designs. "For Example John Smith" wrote in message ... "Gary Boggs" wrote in message ... So why do we have to have a one design contest for the Olympics? That's exactly my point and it sounds like you and Eric at least agree Why not just make it a handicapped contest using the current fleet? Here we have a minor disagreement. Eric and I are saying that no handicapping is required. We (the sport of soaring) just define 15m as a monoclass and Standard as a monoclass. There, now we're ready. Olympics 2008 will include 2 sailplane racing classes - Standard and 15 Meter. Oops, forgot rules. Same as for the World's I suppose? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
For Example John Smith wrote:
There, now we're ready. Olympics 2008 will include 2 sailplane racing classes - Standard and 15 Meter. Oops, forgot rules. Same as for the World's I suppose? Allow a small delay for rules. Say, till Olympics 2009 ;-) ? -- Denis R. Parce que ça rompt le cours normal de la conversation !!! Q. Pourquoi ne faut-il pas répondre au-dessus de la question ? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
All the arguments I'm hearing AGAINST gliding an an Olympic sport can be
equally applied to one or more other sports that are already included in the Olympics, so I don't consider them to be valid - unless there are so many of them that the cumulative effect is to make gliding's participation unfeasible. Which body is responsible for pushing for gliding to be included in the olympics? Is it the FAI? Perhaps this is a problem as they are lobbying on behalf of multiple air sports rather than focusing on one? Has the FAI, IGC, or any other national or international body ever commissioned sports broadcasting consultants to investigate how new technology could be expoited to present and promote gliding competitions? Aparently one country has been trying grand-prix synchronised starts. I'm sure that would be an option for making the racing clearer to the uneducated observer while at the same time providing for exciting TV viewing. Synchonised starts, gaggles with individual trying to break away and take a lead, and finish line beat-ups. I'm sure that it would be of interest to more than die-hard glider pilots. "Stewart Kissel" wrote in message ... SNIP- To promote our sport we need to be positive, and to exploit technology and creativity to present it to viewers as the exciting, challenging and adrenalin pumping sport that it is. SNIP Without sounding too snide, I would think submarine racers might say the same thing about there sport...and it could very well be true. But translating that to outsiders is a different issue. Face it, if most soaring pilots are not interested in watching sailplane races...I suspect the general TV viewing population might find it a tough sale. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.735 / Virus Database: 489 - Release Date: 06/08/2004 |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, August 18, 2004 8:34:56 PM UTC-4, Stewart Kissel wrote:
SNIP- To promote our sport we need to be positive, and to exploit technology and creativity to present it to viewers as the exciting, challenging and adrenalin pumping sport that it is. SNIP Without sounding too snide, I would think submarine racers might say the same thing about there sport...and it could very well be true. But translating that to outsiders is a different issue. Face it, if most soaring pilots are not interested in watching sailplane races...I suspect the general TV viewing population might find it a tough sale. i feel like if there were glider races on tv just like there is golf on the golf channel, every damn one of us would tune in. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Olympics is an inappropriate venue for what we do. If Soaring were
to be included, it should only come after car racing, horse racing, speedboat racing, soapbox derbying, street luge, bmx, skateboarding, rock climbing, hang gliding, paragliding, skydiving, airplane aerobatics, and a dozen or so other like sports more popular than sailplaning. The Olympics already serves enough arcane sports. At least those carry with them a sense of antiquity. New sports really should be added based on participation as well as suitability to the Olympic ideal. We don't much rate on either count. To put it another way, if you toss an iron frisbee or hurl yourself into sand boxes, you really need something like an Olympic gold medal to justify the effort. Soaring has its own unique rewards that need no extra adornments. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|