A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

HURRICANE PROOF BUILDINGS



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old August 19th 04, 10:11 PM
Matt Whiting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Juan Jimenez wrote:

Matt Whiting wrote in
:


That's because you are not an engineer and haven't a clue. Almost all
common building materials can be used to build a structure of a given
strength. It is just that some materials are more cost effective in
certain circumstances. A safe room built from 10" thick oak timbers
would be quite strong. It is just that few people know how to
properly build with timber these days and reinforced concrete is easy
and cheap.
Nothing to do with strength, it is economics.

Matt



Tell me something I don't know, Matt. It's called "taking the cheapest
route and not worrying about the consequences." And it's precisely what I
am addressing. You say I don't have a clue? Tell you what, tell me, when
was the last time you saw a safe room built out of 10" thick oak timbers in
your average wood home?

Juan


I've never seen a safe room as where I live we have safe basements!
However, that wasn't the point. The point was that some here have
claimed that concrete is somehow inherently stronger than wood and that
is simply rubbish.


Matt

  #52  
Old August 19th 04, 10:13 PM
Matt Whiting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Juan Jimenez wrote:

Matt Whiting wrote in
:


No, concrete designed to withstand hurricans beats wood that wasn't so
designed. The old wood sailing ships took a lot more beating on a
daily basis than is dished out by a hurricane. And they held up
rather well.



Source, please. Daily beating on the order of what category hurricane?



Sorry, I don't get paid to educate you. Do a Google search and look at
the psi that say 150 MPH wind generates than then figure out what
pressure is generated from smacking into water at 20-25 MPH.


Matt

  #53  
Old August 19th 04, 10:16 PM
Matt Whiting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Juan Jimenez wrote:

Matt Whiting wrote in
:


The old wood sailing ships took a lot more beating on a...


I was talking about the hull hitting the ways. Hitting a wave at
15-20 knots is a LOT of force.



Excuse me, but who is truly clueless here? Since when did old wood sailing
ships travel at anywhere near 15-20 knots? Maybe down the business side of
a tsunami with a cat 5 hurricane tailwind...

Juan


I didn't say the ship was traveling at 15 - 20 knots. Ships have a
certain speed. Waves also have a certain speed. Ships also rise and
fall in heavy seas. It is the vector sum of all of these that
determines the impact velocity. If a ship is traveling at 8 knots, and
falls 8' into a wave that is traveling at 6 knots in the opposite
direction, the impact force is much greater than the just the 8 knots
speed of the ship. Is this really that hard a concept to understand?


Matt

  #54  
Old August 19th 04, 11:01 PM
Juan Jimenez
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Corky Scott wrote in
:

On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 15:42:31 GMT, Juan Jimenez wrote:

First you tell Matt not to argue with me because you think I'm an
expert on everything and now you agree with my assessment of Mark's
comments. Hmm.

Juan


Actually I think I suggested EVERYONE not argue with you, but it
wasn't because I thought you were "an expert on everything". It was
because you seem to enjoy bickering so much.

Corky Scott


It's a pity that you're so hung up on calling "bickering" what most other
people know as "debate.' That's what usenet is about. Get with the program.


  #55  
Old August 19th 04, 11:01 PM
Juan Jimenez
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Matt Whiting wrote in news:cg355421sa3
@enews1.newsguy.com:

Juan Jimenez wrote:

Matt Whiting wrote in
:


No, concrete designed to withstand hurricans beats wood that wasn't so
designed. The old wood sailing ships took a lot more beating on a
daily basis than is dished out by a hurricane. And they held up
rather well.



Source, please. Daily beating on the order of what category hurricane?


Sorry, I don't get paid to educate you.


Neither do I get paid to humor fools.

plonk!

  #56  
Old August 19th 04, 11:03 PM
Juan Jimenez
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Matt Whiting wrote in
:

Juan Jimenez wrote:

Matt Whiting wrote in
:


The old wood sailing ships took a lot more beating on a...

I was talking about the hull hitting the ways. Hitting a wave at
15-20 knots is a LOT of force.



Excuse me, but who is truly clueless here? Since when did old wood
sailing ships travel at anywhere near 15-20 knots? Maybe down the
business side of a tsunami with a cat 5 hurricane tailwind...

Juan


I didn't say the ship was traveling at 15 - 20 knots. Ships have a
certain speed. Waves also have a certain speed.


20 knot waves. Unhuh. Clueless doesn't do you justice.

Juan

  #58  
Old August 20th 04, 02:43 AM
Matt Whiting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Juan Jimenez wrote:

Matt Whiting wrote in news:cg355421sa3
@enews1.newsguy.com:


Juan Jimenez wrote:


Matt Whiting wrote in
:



No, concrete designed to withstand hurricans beats wood that wasn't so
designed. The old wood sailing ships took a lot more beating on a
daily basis than is dished out by a hurricane. And they held up
rather well.


Source, please. Daily beating on the order of what category hurricane?


Sorry, I don't get paid to educate you.



Neither do I get paid to humor fools.

plonk!


Success at last!


Matt

  #59  
Old August 20th 04, 02:44 AM
Matt Whiting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Juan Jimenez wrote:

Matt Whiting wrote in
:


Juan Jimenez wrote:


Matt Whiting wrote in
:



The old wood sailing ships took a lot more beating on a...

I was talking about the hull hitting the ways. Hitting a wave at
15-20 knots is a LOT of force.


Excuse me, but who is truly clueless here? Since when did old wood
sailing ships travel at anywhere near 15-20 knots? Maybe down the
business side of a tsunami with a cat 5 hurricane tailwind...

Juan


I didn't say the ship was traveling at 15 - 20 knots. Ships have a
certain speed. Waves also have a certain speed.



20 knot waves. Unhuh. Clueless doesn't do you justice.

Juan


I never said anything about 20 knot waves. Now I know why you can't
Google for yourself. You can't read the results.


Matt

  #60  
Old August 22nd 04, 10:13 PM
Matthew P. Cummings
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 02:22:33 +0000, RobertR237 wrote:

expert in all things and nothing will ever change his mind.


I hate to say it, but getting a BD5 ready to fly seems to have changed his
mind, as well as leaving our country.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hurricane Charlie and Lakeland Orval Fairbairn Home Built 12 August 17th 04 02:42 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.