Slamming just occured in NYC

cjcampbell wrote:
Skylune wrote:
News is it was a light aircraft. Look for NYC to ask for an ADIZ.

It is despicable to see you so overjoyed about this.

Listen: I am happy whenever the true state of GA gets media attention.
And then to watch the AOPA/FAA go into damage control mode, spewing
misinformation in order to protect the industry. I admit to that.

As far as people dying, that is tragic. Thank god no deaths on the
ground, just injuries. If this accident helps to convince just a few
people that flying is not nearly as simple as the total propaganda that
AOPA/EAA put out, some good can come of it.

I will not post here again. Goodbye lemmings.

Skylune wrote:


Live free, or die. Libertarian. Do as you wish, but when you do harm
to others (pollution/safety), govt. must get involved.


There it is... the socialist philosophy.. "govt. must get involved."

The simple fact is that in a free society people will get hurt, and
people do die. That is just the way it is and always has been since
the beginning of time. Leftist (and those masquerading as Libertarians)
can't *stand* the concept. They simply cannot accept the fact that
a guarantee against ever getting a booboo has not and will not ever
exist on earth.

I guess they figure if they can eventually get just about everything
outlawed, banned or restricted (except picking your nose) then
things will be fine.... until a meteor falls on your house.

Skylune wrote:

I will not post here again. Goodbye lemmings.

If you'd only keep your promise... Your posting here significantly
lowers the signal-to-noise ratio in the forum

Skylune wrote:


I will not post here again. Goodbye lemmings.


Don't let the door hit you in the ass.

Marissa Taylor wrote:
Gary Drescher wrote:

"ktbr" wrote in message
...
You are right in the sense that your views are in agreement
with so many other leftist/socialists whose philosophy is
that the solution to each and every problem in life is simply
ever more restrictions and regulation.

Uh, as opposed to right-wingers, who seldom try to unduly restrict people?

Correct.

Ever heard of "gay marriage ammendments" and other such moral
legislation BS?

In article . com,
"JohnH" wrote:

Uh, as opposed to right-wingers, who seldom try to unduly restrict people?

Correct.

Ever heard of "gay marriage ammendments" and other such moral
legislation BS?

Yep - but the left wingers is pushing gay marriage, not the right wing.

--
Bob Noel
Looking for a sig the
lawyers will hate

"Bob Noel" wrote in message
...
In article . com,
"JohnH" wrote:

Uh, as opposed to right-wingers, who seldom try to unduly restrict
people?

Correct.

Ever heard of "gay marriage ammendments" and other such moral
legislation BS?

Yep - but the left wingers is pushing gay marriage, not the right wing.

Exactly, just like the left wing pushed interracial marriage, women's
suffrage, the dismantling of segregation laws, repeal of laws against birth
control and non-procreative sex...

The right-wing strategy is constant: after it has lost its struggle for
repression on some particular issue, it disavows its stance on that issue
and insists that conservatism isn't like that anymore. But as long as a
particular struggle is still ongoing, the right wingers still battle for the
repressive side and claim that they're correct to do so.

--Gary

"Gary Drescher" wrote in message
...
"Bob Noel" wrote in message
...
In article . com,
"JohnH" wrote:

Uh, as opposed to right-wingers, who seldom try to unduly restrict
people?

Correct.

Ever heard of "gay marriage ammendments" and other such moral
legislation BS?

Yep - but the left wingers is pushing gay marriage, not the right wing.

Exactly, just like the left wing pushed interracial marriage, women's
suffrage, the dismantling of segregation laws, repeal of laws against
birth control and non-procreative sex...

The right-wing strategy is constant: after it has lost its struggle for
repression on some particular issue, it disavows its stance on that issue
and insists that conservatism isn't like that anymore. But as long as a
particular struggle is still ongoing, the right wingers still battle for
the repressive side and claim that they're correct to do so.

--Gary



Check your history and look at which party was the most against
desegregation. I'll give you a hint it starts with a D.

In article ,
"Gary Drescher" wrote:

Ever heard of "gay marriage ammendments" and other such moral
legislation BS?

Yep - but the left wingers is pushing gay marriage, not the right wing.

Exactly, just like the left wing pushed interracial marriage, women's
suffrage, the dismantling of segregation laws, repeal of laws against birth
control and non-procreative sex...

The right-wing strategy is constant: after it has lost its struggle for
repression on some particular issue, it disavows its stance on that issue
and insists that conservatism isn't like that anymore. But as long as a
particular struggle is still ongoing, the right wingers still battle for the
repressive side and claim that they're correct to do so.

I'm not sure you understood my post.

One of these days I'm going to scan a cartoon I have where the punchline is
"I told you he was a knee-jerk liberal"

--
Bob Noel
Looking for a sig the
lawyers will hate

"Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATcox.net wrote in message
...

"Gary Drescher" wrote in message
...
"Bob Noel" wrote in message
...
In article . com,
"JohnH" wrote:

Uh, as opposed to right-wingers, who seldom try to unduly restrict
people?

Correct.

Ever heard of "gay marriage ammendments" and other such moral
legislation BS?

Yep - but the left wingers is pushing gay marriage, not the right wing.

Exactly, just like the left wing pushed interracial marriage, women's
suffrage, the dismantling of segregation laws, repeal of laws against
birth control and non-procreative sex...

The right-wing strategy is constant: after it has lost its struggle for
repression on some particular issue, it disavows its stance on that issue
and insists that conservatism isn't like that anymore. But as long as a
particular struggle is still ongoing, the right wingers still battle for
the repressive side and claim that they're correct to do so.

Check your history and look at which party was the most against
desegregation. I'll give you a hint it starts with a D.

I was talking about the left wing and right wing, not about the two branches
of the US Business Party.

The whole point of Richard Nixon's (very effective) "Southern strategy" was
to convince right-wing, segregationist Southern Democrats that the
Republican party was a better match for their values.

--Gary