![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dylan Smith writes:
While doing 170mph on the back of a friend's Super Blackbird (motorcyle), I was not afraid, I merely thought "well, if we do crash at least it won't hurt for very long". The difference between smart people and stupid people is that smart people accurately assess the risks, and stupid people don't. Smart people may still take significant risks, but they know what they are getting into. Stupid people take risks without knowing what they are doing. Thus, the smart person always has the satisfaction of knowing that the result justifies the risk (at least in his own mind), whereas the stupid person just stumbles along, and often stumbles into Darwin's rejected gene pool. Astronauts know what they are getting into. The risks are substantial, but they are smart enough to know what the risks are, and they've accepted them. Good pilots are the same way. So are good motorcycle riders. All of these people ask themselves in advance: Is this experience worth a risk of xx% that I'll be killed? The answer doesn't matter so much as asking the question and heeding the reply. The stupid people just say to themselves: Wow, this looks like fun! General aviation is vastly more dangerous than commercial airlines, but clearly most of the risk comes from careless, stupid pilots and poorly maintained aircraft (and one could argue that the latter is also a consequence of the former). -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 8, 12:25 pm, Dylan Smith wrote:
We all die. Some of us will make a fatal error while aviating. Some of us will spend years dying. But we all die. You have a choice: be afraid of your own shadow and instead of living, merely waiting to die (like many of the most risk averse in society are doing, without even realising that they are merely waiting to die instead of living) - or perhaps take reasonable risks and actually live. I agree to an extent. But when you engage in risky behavior, you have to consider other things besides your own quality of life. You also have to consider the people who would be affected. I would consider flying somewhat risky behavior. Not outrageously so, but riskier than the behaviors that the average person will engage in. So I struggle with the question of whether I should continue to fly if/ when my wife and I have children. Should one engage in unnecessary, above average risky behavior when one has responsibilities to family - especially young children? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! __________==___ gitqexec | OtisWinslow | Piloting | 8 | November 12th 04 06:34 PM |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! _____________ efamf | Keith Willshaw | Naval Aviation | 4 | November 11th 04 01:51 AM |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! __________==___gitqexec | Chris W | Piloting | 0 | November 10th 04 12:39 AM |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! __________-+__ihuvpe | john smith | Instrument Flight Rules | 1 | November 9th 04 03:50 AM |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! __________==___ gitqexec | Richard Hertz | Piloting | 0 | November 7th 04 11:45 PM |