![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 29, 2:57 pm, "Bill Daniels" bildan@comcast-dot-net wrote:
We actually tested the power required to retrieve Spectra and the starter motor is way more powerful than needed. Not sure what your problem is at Lasham. Derek will answer for himself, but I expect they retrieve against the pay-out brake on the winch, as per normal operation. If you don't, the drum will keep turning under its own momentum when the retrieve stops and you'll get cable everywhere. Not good. The cost of Spectra is more like three times the cost of steel not 5 times - I checked the prices this morning. It takes a LOT of power to pull steel cable across an airfield - I can pull a mile of Spectra with one finger. We need verifiable data from retrieve winches. Your tests at Lasham are not verifiable since you did no controlled experiments. Having been to Lasham myself and talked to people there (though not yet witnessed the retrieve winch itself operating), I'm perfectly satisfied that what Derek says about the performance of both UHMWPE and retrieve winches is correct. Dan |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dan G" wrote in message ... On Nov 29, 2:57 pm, "Bill Daniels" bildan@comcast-dot-net wrote: We actually tested the power required to retrieve Spectra and the starter motor is way more powerful than needed. Not sure what your problem is at Lasham. Derek will answer for himself, but I expect they retrieve against the pay-out brake on the winch, as per normal operation. If you don't, the drum will keep turning under its own momentum when the retrieve stops and you'll get cable everywhere. Not good. Yes, they certainly pull against the heavy payout brake - they have to, they're using steel cable. You have to keep steel under tension to prevent tangles. Spectra/Dyneema doesn't need that tension. Spectra/Dyneema doesn't ball up and tangle like steel so you use much lighter braking force. In fact, with tension control used for braking, very light reverse torque is more than enough to prevent problems so very, very little force is needed to pull out a Spectra cable from a winch designed to take advantage of Spectra/Dyneema. To get all the benefits of Spectra/Dyneema, you have to not only modify the winch, you have to change operational techniques. Just throwing it on an old steel cable winch and using steel cable operating techniques is guaranteed to fail - as it did at Lasham. The cost of Spectra is more like three times the cost of steel not 5 times - I checked the prices this morning. It takes a LOT of power to pull steel cable across an airfield - I can pull a mile of Spectra with one finger. We need verifiable data from retrieve winches. Your tests at Lasham are not verifiable since you did no controlled experiments. Having been to Lasham myself and talked to people there (though not yet witnessed the retrieve winch itself operating), I'm perfectly satisfied that what Derek says about the performance of both UHMWPE and retrieve winches is correct. Derek says Dyneema doesn't work because it's too expensive, wears out faster than steel and doesn't provide any aditional height. Evedence from many other sites successfuly using Dyneema is to the contrary on all points. The difference is that successful sites did their homework and made all the neccessary changes. Bill Daniels |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dan G" schrieb im Newsbeitrag ... On Nov 28, 6:22 pm, "Sönke Gutzlaff" wrote: 950m steel cable + 350hp winch + 20km/h wind + ASK21 = 750m or 78%. More high was possible, but airspace class C begins at 750m above our airfield so I had to release the cable. I think the ASK21 gets the best high on winchlaunch. Our DG1000 always gets 25% less high. Greetings, Sönke Sönke, what speed do you fly at on the winch, and how much back pressure do you apply to the stick? Around 100km/h and the stick full pulled back (I know that's not the optimal position). Another helpfull fact is, that the wind is getting stronger when you get higher so the plane is flying like a kite. But there are only 1 or 2 days during the year when we have such perfect wind. Normaly we are reaching around 500m with the 21. Sönke |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 29, 5:38 pm, "Bill Daniels" bildan@comcast-dot-net wrote:
Yes, they certainly pull against the heavy payout brake - they have to, they're using steel cable. You have to keep steel under tension to prevent tangles. Spectra/Dyneema doesn't need that tension. The pay-out brake is not to keep the line under tension, it's to stop the drum when the retrieve stops, or the drum keeps turning and paying out cable which forms great big loops hanging down from the drum. A drum of UHMWPE will of course be much lighter than a steel one, but the drum itself is heavy enough. If the brake is weak you have to tow very slowly, which is frustrating. Derek says Dyneema doesn't work because it's too expensive, wears out faster than steel and doesn't provide any aditional height. Evedence from many other sites successfuly using Dyneema is to the contrary on all points. The difference is that successful sites did their homework and made all the neccessary changes. Lasham isn't the only club that tried UHMWPE and abadonded it. Pocklington tried it too - with a brand new Skylaunch winch - and also abandoned it. Another club I know well is only using up their current stock of it before reverting to steel. A number of sites had initially very favourable results with UHMWPE but I've never seen any follow-up results, which were promised by the BGA but have never materialised (afaik). Dan |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 29, 8:13 pm, "Sönke Gutzlaff" wrote:
Around 100km/h and the stick full pulled back (I know that's not the optimal position) Judging by your results that's optimal ;-). However at 54 knots and full back stick you must have been fairly close to the stall. With the K21's hook being pretty much on the CG point (unlike, say, a K13's quite forwards hook) I'd worry about what happens on a cable break. If you were really switched on I expect it would be fine but with a moment's hesitation you could end up very nose-high without much speed... Dan |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dan G" schrieb im Newsbeitrag ... On Nov 29, 8:13 pm, "Sönke Gutzlaff" wrote: Around 100km/h and the stick full pulled back (I know that's not the optimal position) Judging by your results that's optimal ;-). However at 54 knots and full back stick you must have been fairly close to the stall. With the K21's hook being pretty much on the CG point (unlike, say, a K13's quite forwards hook) I'd worry about what happens on a cable break. If you were really switched on I expect it would be fine but with a moment's hesitation you could end up very nose-high without much speed... I've learned that 100km/h is fast enough, our instructors even say 90km/h ist the perfect speed for the 21 to gain maximun high. I had lot of cable breaks this year and no problems with the speed. You've only to react fast enough. And the 21 is a very friendly flying plane (with our other planes, especially the ASW19 I prefer higher speeds on winch launch) and you normaly are not pulling the stick full back before you reach the safety high. |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Er, did you actually read what I wrote Bill? I said
that UHMWPE cable is good stuff, and becomes doubly advantageous for retrieve winching, where you are pulling two cables into the air, and for longer runs. It also doesn't try to untwist when new, unlike stranded steel cable, or kink like piano wire. As Dan G has pointed out it is also safer to handle. The main downside is cost, plus the fact that on short runs cable weight is not much of an issue and you don't get that much of a height advantage by using synthetic cable. We had a period at Lasham when one of our winches had synthetic cable on one drum and steel cable on the other, so we were able to do direct comparisons on alternate launches in the same conditions. As a percentage of the cable run in still evening air, we averaged about 38% for steel cable and 41% for synthetic. For a 4000ft run this works out at 1520 ft for steel and 1640ft for synthetic, so there was an advantage of just over 100ft in using synthetic. Off course the longer the run the greater the advantage would become, but then how many clubs have a winch run of more than 5000 feet? Lasham didn't just throw UHMWPE cable onto an existing winch! We had a number of modifications done in preparation, to prevent drum crushing and to smooth the rollers, as recommended by Skylaunch. Our Retrieve winch came fitted with some very light, orange coloured, synthetic string, but as I have already said that lasted no time at all. The one synthetic main cable we tried actually lasted longer than a steel cable, giving 2500 launches as compared with about 1900 launches, but this was not enough to offset the extra cost. I should point out that we normally launch across two 50 metre wide, extremely abrasive and rough WW2 concrete runways, so we suffer high cable wear rates at the best of times. There is a plan to dig these runways up (when there is a local building project going on and we can get a good price for the hard core) and replace them with smooth narrow tarmac strips for winter operations. We may then reconsider synthetic winch cables. The retrieve winch pulls the cable back at about 50mph. If you don't provide some pay-out braking, not only will the main winch drum probably over-run when you stop pulling, but the cable has enough momentum that it won't stop when you cut the throttle on the retrieve winch and you pull the rings into the rollers. This has happened to me on one occasion as a retrieve winch driver when the main winch driver didn't apply enough braking. The Skylaunch retrieve winch is powerful enough to pull back any sort of cable over any reasonable distance. I have carried a number of comparison tests in the last year which I have reported on the Yahoo Winch Launching Group website. OK I couldn't measure as many parameters as I would have liked, but they were generally carried out on relatively still evenings (I instruct on an evening group) with the same winch and winch drivers and a small group of pilots, so they should be fairly indicative. Sometimes I just asked other pilots and instructors how high they getting under various circumstances. When we were using the retrieve winch (we still often vehicle retrieve in the evening) the most interesting comparison was between the last few launches and the very final one when we disconnect the retrieve cable and launch normally, so the cable can be drawn fully into the winch so we can put it away. That is how I derived the approximate height loss attributable to the retrieve winch. At least I'm not just drawing computer generated curves on a graph, derived from questionable mathematical models, unlike certain contributors to the group who have little or no practical experience of winch launching! Del Copeland At 17:42 29 November 2007, Bill Daniels wrote: 'Dan G' wrote in message .com... On Nov 29, 2:57 pm, 'Bill Daniels' wrote: We actually tested the power required to retrieve Spectra and the starter motor is way more powerful than needed. Not sure what your problem is at Lasham. Derek will answer for himself, but I expect they retrieve against the pay-out brake on the winch, as per normal operation. If you don't, the drum will keep turning under its own momentum when the retrieve stops and you'll get cable everywhere. Not good. Yes, they certainly pull against the heavy payout brake - they have to, they're using steel cable. You have to keep steel under tension to prevent tangles. Spectra/Dyneema doesn't need that tension. Spectra/Dyneema doesn't ball up and tangle like steel so you use much lighter braking force. In fact, with tension control used for braking, very light reverse torque is more than enough to prevent problems so very, very little force is needed to pull out a Spectra cable from a winch designed to take advantage of Spectra/Dyneema. To get all the benefits of Spectra/Dyneema, you have to not only modify the winch, you have to change operational techniques. Just throwing it on an old steel cable winch and using steel cable operating techniques is guaranteed to fail - as it did at Lasham. The cost of Spectra is more like three times the cost of steel not 5 times - I checked the prices this morning. It takes a LOT of power to pull steel cable across an airfield - I can pull a mile of Spectra with one finger. We need verifiable data from retrieve winches. Your tests at Lasham are not verifiable since you did no controlled experiments. Having been to Lasham myself and talked to people there (though not yet witnessed the retrieve winch itself operating), I'm perfectly satisfied that what Derek says about the performance of both UHMWPE and retrieve winches is correct. Derek says Dyneema doesn't work because it's too expensive, wears out faster than steel and doesn't provide any aditional height. Evedence from many other sites successfuly using Dyneema is to the contrary on all points. The difference is that successful sites did their homework and made all the neccessary changes. Bill Daniels |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dan G" wrote in message ... On Nov 29, 5:38 pm, "Bill Daniels" bildan@comcast-dot-net wrote: Yes, they certainly pull against the heavy payout brake - they have to, they're using steel cable. You have to keep steel under tension to prevent tangles. Spectra/Dyneema doesn't need that tension. The pay-out brake is not to keep the line under tension, it's to stop the drum when the retrieve stops, or the drum keeps turning and paying out cable which forms great big loops hanging down from the drum. A drum of UHMWPE will of course be much lighter than a steel one, but the drum itself is heavy enough. If the brake is weak you have to tow very slowly, which is frustrating. I bet it's frustrating. Why don't you re-engineer it so it works right. You need to re-think tension. Steel needs to be kept under tension any time you are moving it. If it is just laying in the grass, it's still under a little tension due to friction with the grass. If it takes 70hp to pull out the cable, you're using way too much brake. Tension control winches use the hydraulic motor to provide light reverse torque, not a brake. It takes very little reverse torque to prevent over runs with UHMWPE. Derek says Dyneema doesn't work because it's too expensive, wears out faster than steel and doesn't provide any aditional height. Evedence from many other sites successfuly using Dyneema is to the contrary on all points. The difference is that successful sites did their homework and made all the neccessary changes. Lasham isn't the only club that tried UHMWPE and abadonded it. Pocklington tried it too - with a brand new Skylaunch winch - and also abandoned it. Another club I know well is only using up their current stock of it before reverting to steel. A number of sites had initially very favourable results with UHMWPE but I've never seen any follow-up results, which were promised by the BGA but have never materialised (afaik). The start of this thread was about some very talented folkes in Belgium who set a release height record using UHMWPE on a winch designed for it. UHMWPE is a spectacular success as a winch rope. It beats steel on all counts including wear and life. In fact it lasts long enough to actually be cheaper than steel on a per launch basis. BUT, you have to understand it AND you winch has to be designed for it. Skylaunch is a great steel cable winch. However, it would need a lot of modifications to make it a successful UHMWPE winch. I sincerely hope they do this since it would be easier than trying to convince the world that UHMWPE doesn't work. UHMWPE has never failed anyone but some people trying to use it have failed to use it properly. If you want to know how to use it right, talk to the people who succeeded not the ones who failed. Make a call to Belgium. Bill Daniels |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Del C" wrote in message ... Er, did you actually read what I wrote Bill? No. I usually don't since I've found it's mostly BS. |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The K21 seems to climb as well as anything on a winch
launch, despite being a bit big and heavy. Probably only a K8 will beat it. We have a couple of DG1000s and they don't climb quite as well. If you pull the stick well back, a sort of pitching motion seems to set in as though the elevator is stalling. Del Copeland At 21:18 28 November 2007, Dan G wrote: On Nov 28, 6:22 pm, 'S=F6nke Gutzlaff' wrote: 950m steel cable + 350hp winch + 20km/h wind + ASK21 =3D 750m or 78%. More high was possible, but airspace class C begins at 750m above our airfield so I had to release the cable. I think the ASK21 gets the best high on winchlaunch. Our DG1000 always get= s 25% less high. Greetings, S=F6nke S=F6nke, what speed do you fly at on the winch, and how much back pressure do you apply to the stick? Dan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How to get maximum height on a winch launch? | Dan G | Soaring | 38 | December 22nd 16 12:29 AM |
Winch launch speed versus height gain | Neil | Soaring | 20 | November 9th 07 12:57 AM |
Record Highs/Record Lows | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 12 | October 12th 06 01:27 AM |
Perlan height record in Argentina | Charles Yeates | Soaring | 3 | September 1st 06 12:59 PM |
LIppmann reports a 950 meter winch launch with their Dynatec winch line - anything higher? | Bill Daniels | Soaring | 20 | December 27th 04 12:33 AM |