Air sickness

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
Steve Foley writes:

Because you're refractory to explanation, remember?

I wouldn't be the only one reading the explanation.

Nobody else seems interested enough to ask.

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

Buster Hymen writes:

Why should Viperdoc waste his time?

He has already wasted the time of others with ineffectual personal
attacks; why not contribute to the newsgroup instead?


Answering you doesn't contribute to anything.

You're a worthless pile of fecal matter.

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

Viperdoc writes:

You're simply not worth the effort.

I was not suggesting that you do it for me.


Yes you were.

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

Steve Foley writes:

Because you're refractory to explanation, remember?

I wouldn't be the only one reading the explanation.

If somone else were to ask, they would appreciate the response. You don't
so no one responds to you with the answer.

Your bull **** in this and many other newsgroups is well known Anthony.

Haven't you figured out yet why you are not welcome in any newsgroup you
participate in.

Yes, the whole world hates you Anthony.

On May 27, 7:55 pm, "Viperdoc" wrote:
Why bother responding to Anthony- he will simply argue the point as if he's
the world's knowledge expert on the subject. The fact remains that he
doesn't fly, never has, never will, and therefore motion sickness from
flight is a non-issue for him.



One can say, of course, there are times when someone ignorant of the
science has a sudden insight that can be a breakthrough, but as my
daddy taught me, that's not the way to place your bets. The chances of
that are much less likely than connecting when drawing to an inside
straight: maybe winning the lottery is a better example.

The good news is, Mx makes his pontifications in a newsgroup where
there are both experts and facts available. His kind of pseudo
knowledge is more dangerous in soft science areas: for some reason
psychology comes to mind.

Tina wrote in
:

On May 27, 7:55 pm, "Viperdoc" wrote:
Why bother responding to Anthony- he will simply argue the point as
if he's the world's knowledge expert on the subject. The fact remains
that he doesn't fly, never has, never will, and therefore motion
sickness from flight is a non-issue for him.



One can say, of course, there are times when someone ignorant of the
science has a sudden insight that can be a breakthrough, but as my
daddy taught me, that's not the way to place your bets. The chances of
that are much less likely than connecting when drawing to an inside
straight: maybe winning the lottery is a better example.

The good news is, Mx makes his pontifications in a newsgroup where
there are both experts and facts available. His kind of pseudo
knowledge is more dangerous in soft science areas: for some reason
psychology comes to mind.



Well, be fair, even the best psychologists are only making it up as they
go along.
in addition, who better to comment on psych probs than someone who's not
only seen 'em all, but had 'em all as well.



Bertie

On May 28, 4:45 pm, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Tina wrote :



On May 27, 7:55 pm, "Viperdoc" wrote:
Why bother responding to Anthony- he will simply argue the point as
if he's the world's knowledge expert on the subject. The fact remains
that he doesn't fly, never has, never will, and therefore motion
sickness from flight is a non-issue for him.

One can say, of course, there are times when someone ignorant of the
science has a sudden insight that can be a breakthrough, but as my
daddy taught me, that's not the way to place your bets. The chances of
that are much less likely than connecting when drawing to an inside
straight: maybe winning the lottery is a better example.

The good news is, Mx makes his pontifications in a newsgroup where
there are both experts and facts available. His kind of pseudo
knowledge is more dangerous in soft science areas: for some reason
psychology comes to mind.

Well, be fair, even the best psychologists are only making it up as they
go along.
in addition, who better to comment on psych probs than someone who's not
only seen 'em all, but had 'em all as well.

Bertie

Sorry BtB, but we actually have modalities with proven results now,
and the side effects are less severe than the psychotropic meds that
had often been used.

In terms of treatments, though, there are some here who present with a
constellation of symptoms that cry for an applied lobometry.

Applied with a hammer.



..

Tina wrote in
:

On May 28, 4:45 pm, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Tina wrote
innews:3e63d246-d105-4950-925b-

om:



On May 27, 7:55 pm, "Viperdoc"
wrote:
Why bother responding to Anthony- he will simply argue the point
as if he's the world's knowledge expert on the subject. The fact
remains that he doesn't fly, never has, never will, and therefore
motion sickness from flight is a non-issue for him.

One can say, of course, there are times when someone ignorant of
the science has a sudden insight that can be a breakthrough, but as
my daddy taught me, that's not the way to place your bets. The
chances of that are much less likely than connecting when drawing
to an inside straight: maybe winning the lottery is a better
example.

The good news is, Mx makes his pontifications in a newsgroup where
there are both experts and facts available. His kind of pseudo
knowledge is more dangerous in soft science areas: for some reason
psychology comes to mind.

Well, be fair, even the best psychologists are only making it up as
they go along.
in addition, who better to comment on psych probs than someone who's
not only seen 'em all, but had 'em all as well.

Bertie

Sorry BtB, but we actually have modalities with proven results now,
and the side effects are less severe than the psychotropic meds that
had often been used.

So did the guys who used to drill holes in their heads to let the demons
out.
I'm not saying you guys don't do some good, but can you put your hand on
your heart and look into the future and tell me the people who inherit
your trade won't shudder at some of the stuff you do know? I know the
people flying whatever they will be flying in fifty years will!

In terms of treatments, though, there are some here who present with a
constellation of symptoms that cry for an applied lobometry.

Applied with a hammer.


I concur.

Bertie

"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
...


I concur.

Bertie


or at least you would if you knew what it meant.

"Maxwell" luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote in news:APl%j.33$U_5.31
@newsfe15.lga:


"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
...


I concur.

Bertie


or at least you would if you knew what it meant.




Oh but I do..



Bertie