![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Very good points. I just bought my first digital. It's a Canon Powershot
A70. While not as small as the Elph, it does fit in my pocket and I take it just about everywhere. Portability is a bigger factor than most people realize. But there are times when it just doesn't get quite as much as I'd like it to. What really tempts me about the Rebel is the capability of using an image stabilized lens. While not quite as good as a gyro platform, it's got to be a great help. Have to find out more. And I think you'll find that for aerial shots, the clearest days are also the bumpiest. It's the nature of the beast. It's fairly rare, at least around here, to get a clear AND calm day at the altitudes I like to shoot from. Another thing to consider is that with a 6 meg camera set to highest resolution (why shoot anything less?), you're going to need a big card. My CAP unit has a Kodak 6 meg camera with a 1 gig card in it. I think it's good for about 300 shots, but I don't know if that's at highest res. Didn't get to play with it much. Don't know how much a 1 gig card goes for either. mike regish "Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:tKkjb.140986$%h1.140943@sccrnsc02... Canon just came out with a 6 megapixel "SLR" digital that will use all of the Canon lenses from their 35mm line. This includes sever image stabilized lenses/ I've seen it for $899 with a 55-80mm lens. That is slightly longer than it would be on 35mm due to the imaging chip's size. You can have something like 50 or 60 lenses to chose from. It's the Canon EOS-300D Digital Rebel. That's a great deal, on a great sounding camera, but I want to throw something in the mix he Convenience. I used to own a Nikon SLR. All the bells and whistles, all the lenses. The pictures it took were stunning. I never used it. Well, I shouldn't say "never" -- but it was so big and unwieldy that I never caught that candid shot at the birthday party, or that image of the fall colors on my way to work. It was just too danged big to be considered "portable", and it was a major production to get it set up. That's why we went with the Canon Elph a couple of years ago, even though photographically there were superior choices. The danged little thing actually, REALLY fits in your shirt pocket, has a useful little zoom lens, easy to use controls, and takes pretty darned good pictures. (All the pictures on our website were taken with it.) Best of all, it's ALWAYS in my top pocket, or Mary's purse, waiting to be used... When it breaks, I'm buying another one. (They've now got it up to 4 megapixels, I think...) Just something else to consider. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael 182" wrote in message . net... I know, I know - it's way OT, but I'm about to spend significant money on a digital camera, and it seems like the people in here may know more than any advice I'm getting from friends. I posted over on alt.photography, but it is a pretty quiet newsgroup. Check out http://www.stevesdigicam.com He has reviews, sample pics, etc from what seems like every digital camera known to man! haha Seriously though, give the website a shot... |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Link doesn't work for me. I get redirected. Sure it's right?
mike regish "Chuck" wrote in message nk.net... "Michael 182" wrote in message . net... I know, I know - it's way OT, but I'm about to spend significant money on a digital camera, and it seems like the people in here may know more than any advice I'm getting from friends. I posted over on alt.photography, but it is a pretty quiet newsgroup. Check out http://www.stevesdigicam.com He has reviews, sample pics, etc from what seems like every digital camera known to man! haha Seriously though, give the website a shot... |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Consider what that means if your engine quits. You have a heck of
along time to find a nice big field, and it can be miles away! I would think that, when circling over an airport, one wouldn't bother looking for a nice big field to land in, especially if it meant landing miles away. I meant, and should have said, "... if your engine quits when you're on a cross-country--especially over mountainous terrain." Out where Jay lives, you're over an "airport" no matter where you are--except perhaps downtown Des Moines. vince norris |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "mike regish" wrote in message . net... Link doesn't work for me. I get redirected. Sure it's right? Sorry... try this... http://www.steves-digicams.com/ |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
our opening webpage
at www.AlexisParkInn.com. It's really shows our position relative to the airport and other important local attractions. A friend asks: "and in the Amelia Earhart Suite, does the hot tub have a little island in it...with skeletons?" |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A friend asks: "and in the Amelia Earhart Suite, does the hot tub have a
little island in it...with skeletons?" Hmm. We'll have to work on that... (It's darned near big enough. The hot tub in this suite is 50% bigger than in our other suites...) -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you want a pocket-sived camera with a 10X zoom, the Kodak DX6490
might be a good bet. Here is a URL (which will need cutting and pasting: http://www.kodak.com/eknec/PageQueri...equestid=13807 I've found the earlier DX4900, when paired with an LCD viewer and CrystalVue monocular, makes a good wildlife camera. I'd suspect that the new Kodak would be even better for digiscoping. Paul |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:30:37 GMT, "Jay Honeck"
wrote: A friend asks: "and in the Amelia Earhart Suite, does the hot tub have a little island in it...with skeletons?" Hmm. We'll have to work on that... (It's darned near big enough. The hot tub in this suite is 50% bigger than in our other suites...) It oughta be the suite nobody can find. Don |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Or that you could get lost in...
mike regish "Don Tuite" wrote in message ... On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:30:37 GMT, "Jay Honeck" wrote: A friend asks: "and in the Amelia Earhart Suite, does the hot tub have a little island in it...with skeletons?" Hmm. We'll have to work on that... (It's darned near big enough. The hot tub in this suite is 50% bigger than in our other suites...) It oughta be the suite nobody can find. Don |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Landing and T/O distances (Was Cold War ALternate Basing) | Guy Alcala | Military Aviation | 3 | August 13th 04 12:18 PM |
Hiroshima/Nagasaki vs conventional B-17 bombing | zxcv | Military Aviation | 55 | April 4th 04 07:05 AM |
Looking for Cessna Caravan pilots | [email protected] | Owning | 9 | April 1st 04 02:54 AM |
Use of 150 octane fuel in the Merlin (Xylidine additive etc etc) | Peter Stickney | Military Aviation | 45 | February 11th 04 04:46 AM |
Ta-152H at low altitudes | N-6 | Military Aviation | 16 | October 13th 03 03:52 AM |