![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have always wondered how the attack would have played out if the Americans
had correctly interpreted the reading from the Army radar site on the north tip of Oahu. The attacking Japanese planes were picked up at a range of 132 miles at 7 o'clock Sunday morning. The radar operators phoned the duty office, Lt. Kermit Tyler and told him (paraphrase) that ".... a large formation of planes is approaching from the north." Tyler knew that eleven B-17s were due to arrive and assumed that the radar operators were seeing the B-17s and told them "Well, don't worry about it." The operators had interpreted the signal that they were seeing as representing over fifty planes. They did not know about the B-17 flight. If they had told Tyler that there were over fifty planes approaching instead of saying a 'large number', Tyler might have sounded the alarm. If he had sounded the alarm the Americans would have had about thirty minutes to get ready for the attack. I don't know how long it would take the sailors to get to their battle stations but I assume that 30 minutes would give them enough time to get to their AA guns and get them loaded. At least they would all be out of their bunks and all water tight doors and hatches could have been closed. The AA defenses on the ships were nothing like the late WWII batteries but there were dozens if not hundreds of 1.1" quad mounts on ships in the harbor when one considers the number of destroyers and auxiliaries present. The 1.1" had a lot of long term reliability problems but put out a lot of firepower when they were working. There were probably even more .50 caliber machine guns in addition to the sixty or seventy 5'' dual purpose mounts. The Army also had substantial AA batteries and the infantry and marines had .30 LMGs and BARs. On the other hand, many soldiers and sailors might have been off base or ashore. Could the Army have gotten their P-40s and P-36s up in time? The P-40s were more than a match for the Zeros (contrary to popular myth) and would have been going after the Kates and Vals anyway. I don't know how many P-40s were in Hawaii that morning of if there were any Navy or Marine fighters on Ford Island or at Ewa air station. I think the American carries were about 200 miles west of Pearl Harbor on the morning of the attack. Could they have sent approximately 80 Wildcats into the battle? They probably could not have gotten there by 7:55 but they could have been there by the time the second wave arrived. The second wave would probably have been canceled by the Japanese if surprise had not been achieved. Another twist I have wondered about is what would have happened it anti-torpedo nets had been deployed at Pearl Harbor. I think more than half the Kates in the first wave were armed with torpedoes. The Navy had not completely discounted the possibility of torpedo attacks due to the relatively shallow depth of the harbor. I also don't know how well the nets would have worked but the possibility of neutralizing a large portion of the first wave would surly have affected the battle. Admiral Furlong, the day's Senior Officer Present Afloat ordered all ship to sortie as soon as the attack began. If he had been given a 30 minute warning would he have ordered the sortie if nets had been present? They probably couldn't get steam up in 30 minutes anyway. I looking forward to hearing the group's thoughts. Thanks, Dave Kennedy Atlanta |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Remember Pearl Harbor: Special Program Tonight at EAA | Fitzair4 | Home Built | 0 | December 7th 04 07:40 PM |
For Keith Willshaw... | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 253 | July 6th 04 05:18 AM |