![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm going to update my 15 yr old SoftComm mono headphones and would
appreciate opinions and reasons on choice of replacement. I don't fly many hours a year or particularly long distances (3hr max) so I'm leaning towards the David Clark H10-60 or H10-13.4. The only difference appears to be weight and choice of boom. Since my old headset uses the wire type boom and works fine what's the practical differences. Any other options appreciated. David |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
john smith wrote:
The DC H10-40 (wire boom with M7 electret element) is still available. They do not advertise it, however. I prefer the wire boom to the flex boom. The wire boom can be moved closer to ones mouth and will remain in position better than the flex boom of the the -13.4. My first (and primary) headset is a DC H10-80 which is no longer made. It has the flex mike and although the headphone part of the headset is all I could ask for, the flex mike isn't. Like you said, it has a bad habit of easing away from your mouth. I have since added a H10-40 clone from Marv Golden to my flightbag for friends to use. I happened to try it out not too long ago and found its wire boom mike worked much better than the mike on my much more expensive David Clark headset. A very well spent $80. -- Mortimer Schnerd, RN VE |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 20:16:03 GMT, "Mortimer Schnerd, RN"
wrote: My first (and primary) headset is a DC H10-80 which is no longer made. It has the flex mike and although the headphone part of the headset is all I could ask for, the flex mike isn't. Like you said, it has a bad habit of easing away from your mouth. My set is 17 years old and doesn't have this problem. But I bet if you contact DC they'll fix it for you. As an aside, I converted mine to ANR about 10 years ago. They just keep on chugging. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 18:02:06 -0400, Dave Anderer
wrote: On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 20:16:03 GMT, "Mortimer Schnerd, RN" wrote: My first (and primary) headset is a DC H10-80 which is no longer made. It has the flex mike and although the headphone part of the headset is all I could ask for, the flex mike isn't. Like you said, it has a bad habit of easing away from your mouth. My set is 17 years old and doesn't have this problem. But I bet if you contact DC they'll fix it for you. As an aside, I converted mine to ANR about 10 years ago. They just keep on chugging. Interesting comments on the flex mike. I've only used one on a DC once and thought it was more difficult to position and keep in place. I don't think I can justify ANR for the low hours I fly. I can't say I have a problem with a standard headset. I'm still looking at options but I see some have an option for cellphone which I presume will work with an audio checklist which would be useful? The SoftComm C-80 BNE has this option but it appears to be a flex boom. Looks slightly different to DC but is it any better/worse? David |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, let me ask the obvious: Why DC? IMHO, they haven't kept up with
modern ergnomics (read comfort) nor is their ANR very good. Also, they are comparatively expensive. Oh, whatever you do, get ANR. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 22:25:45 +0200, Thomas Borchert
wrote: Well, let me ask the obvious: Why DC? IMHO, they haven't kept up with modern ergnomics (read comfort) nor is their ANR very good. Also, they are comparatively expensive. Oh, whatever you do, get ANR. That's starting to cross my mind. Many people say how good the DC's are with repairs but since my last headset lasted 15 years maybe I should get the same or simialr again? The SoftComm C-10 Red Baron looks interesting but the colour is a bit bright :-) David |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thomas Borchert wrote:
Well, let me ask the obvious: Why DC? IMHO, they haven't kept up with modern ergnomics (read comfort) nor is their ANR very good. Also, they are comparatively expensive. But you can't beat the warranty. I've had students slam my cord in the door twice, and it was replaced within a week. Oh, whatever you do, get ANR. I disagree. ANR is great if like it, but it's hardly necessary. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Comtronics Headphone for sale | trex | Home Built | 0 | February 6th 06 11:30 AM |
o2 drug of choice?? | houstondan | Piloting | 10 | February 7th 05 12:40 AM |
A choice of two helicopter schools. | John | Rotorcraft | 2 | August 17th 04 05:52 PM |
Does WiFi affect your choice of FBO? | [email protected] | General Aviation | 8 | October 16th 03 07:22 PM |