![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cool idea. We've thought of it before, but haven't found an
affordable advertising venue that "hits" the right crowd. The flying magazines. In fact, if those prices are even half-true and with the dollar exchange rate being what it is, get together with the nearest Part 141 school, build a package for overseas pilots and advertise in the British and German magazines. Hour building, basic training and advanced training for ME, commercial, instructor or instrument ratings are all of interest. We had a French guy stay with us last summer for a month, while he finished up his Private with a local CFI. It worked out well for all concerned. Trouble is, I doubt anyone would want to train here in the winter, which is the only time we're not full. As much as I'd love to do this, there's little sense in my paying to enhance our business during the nice weather, cuz you can't fuller than full. I've got it! We need student pilots from, say, Siberia to come here to train in the winter, when we're slow and we've got lots of available suites. They will think the weather in Iowa is quite tame, and we'll have some interesting people show up at Movie Night! :-) -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 25, 2:20 pm, wrote:
On Nov 22, 10:50 am, Jay Honeck wrote: I doubt these are the only reasons. The return on investment is what ultimately matters and is perceived differently by different people when it comes to investing $6000. Just as I don't have any particularly strong interest in learning to rock climb, I can imagine there are those who view flying with a similar apathy. In the end it would be hard to make the case that the PPL has a greater practical utility than say, learning to ride a horse. PPL flying is a niche hobby, and its hard to imagine that would change anytime soon. Hmmm. I've spent the last 13 years flying my family from coast to coast, Canada to Mexico, on vacations ranging from overnight to two weeks in duration. I've flown hundreds of times in support of my business(es) during that time as well. Leaving from Iowa City I can be in Chicago for brunch, St Louis for Madoon, the boycott is broken, next thing he'll be here for Cubs games. dinner, and home by the 10 o'clock news. Do *that* on a horse! Although personal flying will never be as rock-solid reliable as a Greyhound bus (due primarily to my own budget and equipment limitations), to say that the PPL has little practical value is inaccurate. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination"- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Unfortunate that the GA economic powerhouse has crippled the Chicago economy, though... |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 26, 10:53 am, Skylune wrote:
Unfortunate that the GA economic powerhouse has crippled the Chicago economy, though... Now here's a blast from the past.. Care to explain your theory? |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Unfortunate that the GA economic powerhouse has crippled the Chicago
economy, though... Now here's a blast from the past.. Care to explain your theory? He's sarcastically referring to our moratorium on visiting Chicago since King Daley ripped up Meigs Field. We haven't been back since -- we won't go back till Daley is out of office. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck writes:
He's sarcastically referring to our moratorium on visiting Chicago since King Daley ripped up Meigs Field. We haven't been back since -- we won't go back till Daley is out of office. Does he have an heir to inherit his office? |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
Keep in mind that business and private expenditures are orders of magnitude apart. General aviation that might be booming for business could still be hopelessly beyond the reach of pilots flying for leisure. That's why you don't see too many people flying Learjets for leisure, and you don't see too many CEOs flying in Piper Cubs or ultralights. You couldn't be more wrong if you tried. People who have the means don't generally fly airplanes like Learjets and Barons for leisure because they are not particularly fun airplanes to fly if what you're after is the sheer joy of flying. Sure, they're all fun to fly initially when you're learning a new aircraft, and larger, faster, and more complex is always a bonus. But after the honeymoon is over all the pilots I know would chose the smaller, simpler aircraft to fly for fun every time. I'm sure you're suprised to learn this and I'm sure it doesn't fit into what you'd suppose to be true. That doesn't make it any less true however. BDS |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BDS wrote:
Mxsmanic wrote in Keep in mind that business and private expenditures are orders of magnitude apart. General aviation that might be booming for business could still be hopelessly beyond the reach of pilots flying for leisure. That's why you don't see too many people flying Learjets for leisure, and you don't see too many CEOs flying in Piper Cubs or ultralights. You couldn't be more wrong if you tried. People who have the means don't generally fly airplanes like Learjets and Barons for leisure because they are not particularly fun airplanes to fly if what you're after is the sheer joy of flying. Sure, they're all fun to fly initially when you're learning a new aircraft, and larger, faster, and more complex is always a bonus. But after the honeymoon is over all the pilots I know would chose the smaller, simpler aircraft to fly for fun every time. I'm sure you're suprised to learn this and I'm sure it doesn't fit into what you'd suppose to be true. That doesn't make it any less true however. BDS Yep I know to CEOs here locally one with a Cub and one with a Luscombe who, if they desired, afford to fly just about anything they wanted. |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gig 601XL Builder wrote:
BDS wrote: Mxsmanic wrote in Keep in mind that business and private expenditures are orders of magnitude apart. General aviation that might be booming for business could still be hopelessly beyond the reach of pilots flying for leisure. That's why you don't see too many people flying Learjets for leisure, and you don't see too many CEOs flying in Piper Cubs or ultralights. You couldn't be more wrong if you tried. People who have the means don't generally fly airplanes like Learjets and Barons for leisure because they are not particularly fun airplanes to fly if what you're after is the sheer joy of flying. Sure, they're all fun to fly initially when you're learning a new aircraft, and larger, faster, and more complex is always a bonus. But after the honeymoon is over all the pilots I know would chose the smaller, simpler aircraft to fly for fun every time. I'm sure you're suprised to learn this and I'm sure it doesn't fit into what you'd suppose to be true. That doesn't make it any less true however. BDS Yep I know to CEOs here locally one with a Cub and one with a Luscombe who, if they desired, afford to fly just about anything they wanted. OTOH, there's the warbird addiction... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Stryker is a piece of shit! | noname | Military Aviation | 53 | May 12th 04 04:11 AM |
CBS News Piece | Philip Sondericker | Piloting | 23 | January 18th 04 01:03 AM |
Uh-oh: CBS News to air anti-GA hit piece on Wed. 1/14 | Maule Driver | Owning | 65 | January 17th 04 09:58 PM |
Uh-oh: CBS News to air anti-GA hit piece on Wed. 1/14 | Maule Driver | Piloting | 71 | January 17th 04 09:58 PM |
FA: Like to own a REAL piece of a Concorde?? | Ann Eccles | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | July 18th 03 07:01 PM |