F-106 Speed record questions....

From: "John R Weiss"
Date: 2/22/2004 9:05 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id: L5e_b.40667$Xp.182937@attbi_s54

"B2431" wrote...

You were expecting an honest, straight and/or knowledgable responce from
tarver?

No...

But I'm an incurable optimist, hoping for one eventually!

You have to stop using those big words. Not everyone knows an optimist is an
eye doctor.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "John R Weiss"
Date: 2/22/2004 9:05 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id: L5e_b.40667$Xp.182937@attbi_s54

"B2431" wrote...

You were expecting an honest, straight and/or knowledgable responce
from
tarver?

Giving Dan a straight answer is a waste of time. especially if you consider
the number of years it took him to see the paradox of the Knoyle archive
troll.

No...

Weiss just piped in to be a prick.

But I'm an incurable optimist, hoping for one eventually!

One you can understand?

You have to stop using those big words. Not everyone knows an optimist is
an
eye doctor.

How goes the slow death?

From: "Tarver Engineering"


Giving Dan a straight answer is a waste of time. especially if you consider
the number of years it took him to see the paradox of the Knoyle archive
troll.


I never used Knoyle's archive, I used Googol and other search engines. You know
people in other newsgroups have similar archives, don't you?

How does it feel to have so many educated people see through your lies and
utter lack of manners?

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "Tarver Engineering"


Giving Dan a straight answer is a waste of time. especially if you
consider
the number of years it took him to see the paradox of the Knoyle archive
troll.


I never used Knoyle's archive,

You ran Knoyle's archive troll on me repeatedly, dumbass. You spent a year
in my killfile and even that did not slow down your insulting childish
behavior.

(B2431) wrote:

From: "John R Weiss"
Date: 2/22/2004 9:05 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id: L5e_b.40667$Xp.182937@attbi_s54

"B2431" wrote...

You were expecting an honest, straight and/or knowledgable responce from
tarver?

No...

But I'm an incurable optimist, hoping for one eventually!

You have to stop using those big words. Not everyone knows an optimist is an
eye doctor.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Eye doctor?...hell, I thought it was a window cleaner...
--

-Gord.

"Tarver Engineering" wrote...

Nope, the operator's handbook describes the flight envelope.

But you just told us the flight envelope is described by the airplane's
ability
to perform a maneuver or enter a flight regime using a "normal" control
configuration!

The POH is part of the Type Certificate.

Non sequitur. Military aircraft don't, in general, have type certificates. I'm
fairly certain the F-106 never had one.


Are you claiming the Dash 1 for an F-106 disagrees with a mach 2.3 F-106?

I'm not claiming anything. I am questioning your basis for your multiple,
contradictory definitions and descriptions of "flight envelope" and "normal
operation."

"John R Weiss" wrote in message
news:x%s_b.249390$U%5.1719263@attbi_s03...
"Tarver Engineering" wrote...

Nope, the operator's handbook describes the flight envelope.

But you just told us the flight envelope is described by the airplane's
ability
to perform a maneuver or enter a flight regime using a "normal" control
configuration!

The POH is part of the Type Certificate.

Non sequitur. Military aircraft don't, in general, have type
certificates. I'm
fairly certain the F-106 never had one.

You are the one that brought the POH into the discussion, Weiss.

Go play your childish silly game elsewhere.

From: "Tarver Engineering"


"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "Tarver Engineering"


Giving Dan a straight answer is a waste of time. especially if you
consider
the number of years it took him to see the paradox of the Knoyle archive
troll.


I never used Knoyle's archive,

You ran Knoyle's archive troll on me repeatedly, dumbass.

Prove it.

You spent a year
in my killfile

Funny how you kept responding to me during that year.

and even that did not slow down your insulting childish
behavior.


Prove it. The only thing you perceived as insulting is when I proved you wrong.
Unlike you I never called you vulgar names nor directed personal insults at
you.

Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired